SQL Server 2008 版本的 OVER(... 行无限制在前)
SQL Server 2008 version of OVER(... Rows Unbounded Preceding)
寻求帮助将其转换为 SQL Server 2008 友好,因为我无法解决。我试过交叉应用和内部连接(不是说我做对了)都无济于事...有什么建议吗?
这本质上是有 table 库存和 table 订单。
并将两者结合起来,告诉我一旦股票被拿走应该挑选什么(更多细节见我之前的问题)
WITH ADVPICK
AS (SELECT 'A' AS PlaceA,
placeb,
CASE
WHEN picktime = '00:00' THEN '07:00'
ELSE ISNULL(picktime, '12:00')
END AS picktime,
Cast(product AS INT) AS product,
prd_description,
-qty AS Qty
FROM t_pick_orders
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A' AS PlaceA,
placeb,
'0',
Cast(code AS INT) AS product,
NULL,
stock
FROM t_pick_stock),
STOCK_POST_ORDER
AS (SELECT *,
Sum(qty)
OVER (
PARTITION BY placeb, product
ORDER BY picktime ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ) AS new_qty
FROM ADVPICK)
SELECT *,
CASE
WHEN new_qty > qty THEN new_qty
ELSE qty
END AS order_shortfall
FROM STOCK_POST_ORDER
WHERE new_qty < 0
ORDER BY placeb,
picktime,
product
现在按顺序分区的总和是 SQL 服务器 2012+ 但是我有两台服务器 运行 2008 年所以需要转换...
预期结果:
+--------+--------+----------+---------+-----------+-------+---------+-----------------+
| PlaceA | PlaceB | Picktime | product | Prd_Descr | qty | new_qty | order_shortfall |
+--------+--------+----------+---------+-----------+-------+---------+-----------------+
| BW | AMES | 16:00 | 1356 | Product A | -1330 | -17 | -17 |
| BW | AMES | 16:00 | 17 | Product B | -48 | -42 | -42 |
| BW | AMES | 17:00 | 1356 | Product A | -840 | -857 | -840 |
| BW | AMES | 18:00 | 1356 | Product A | -770 | -1627 | -770 |
| BW | AMES | 18:00 | 17 | Product B | -528 | -570 | -528 |
| BW | AMES | 19:00 | 1356 | Product A | -700 | -2327 | -700 |
| BW | AMES | 20:00 | 1356 | Product A | -910 | -3237 | -910 |
| BW | AMES | 20:00 | 8009 | Product C | -192 | -52 | -52 |
| BW | AMES | 20:00 | 897 | Product D | -90 | -10 | -10 |
+--------+--------+----------+---------+-----------+-------+---------+-----------------+
一种直接的方法是在 CROSS APPLY
.
中使用相关子查询
如果您的 table 或多或少很大,那么您的下一个问题就是如何让它变快。 PlaceB, Product, PickTime INCLUDE (Qty)
上的索引应该有所帮助。但是,如果你的 table 真的很大,光标会更好。
WITH
ADVPICK
AS
(
SELECT 'A' as PlaceA,PlaceB, case when PickTime = '00:00' then '07:00' else isnull(picktime,'12:00') end as picktime, cast(Product as int) as product, Prd_Description, -Qty AS Qty FROM t_pick_orders
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A' as PlaceA,PlaceB, '0', cast(Code as int) as product, NULL, Stock FROM t_pick_stock
)
,stock_post_order
AS
(
SELECT
*
FROM
ADVPICK AS Main
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT SUM(Sub.Qty) AS new_qty
FROM ADVPICK AS Sub
WHERE
Sub.PlaceB = Main.PlaceB
AND Sub.Product = Main.Product
AND T.PickTime <= Main.PickTime
) AS A
)
SELECT
*,
CASE WHEN new_qty > qty THEN new_qty ELSE qty END AS order_shortfall
FROM
stock_post_order
WHERE
new_qty < 0
ORDER BY PlaceB, picktime, product;
哦,如果 (PlaceB, Product, PickTime)
不是唯一的,您将获得与使用 SUM() OVER
的原始查询不同的结果。如果您需要完全相同的结果,则需要使用一些额外的列(如 ID
)来解决关系。
寻求帮助将其转换为 SQL Server 2008 友好,因为我无法解决。我试过交叉应用和内部连接(不是说我做对了)都无济于事...有什么建议吗?
这本质上是有 table 库存和 table 订单。
并将两者结合起来,告诉我一旦股票被拿走应该挑选什么(更多细节见我之前的问题
WITH ADVPICK
AS (SELECT 'A' AS PlaceA,
placeb,
CASE
WHEN picktime = '00:00' THEN '07:00'
ELSE ISNULL(picktime, '12:00')
END AS picktime,
Cast(product AS INT) AS product,
prd_description,
-qty AS Qty
FROM t_pick_orders
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A' AS PlaceA,
placeb,
'0',
Cast(code AS INT) AS product,
NULL,
stock
FROM t_pick_stock),
STOCK_POST_ORDER
AS (SELECT *,
Sum(qty)
OVER (
PARTITION BY placeb, product
ORDER BY picktime ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING ) AS new_qty
FROM ADVPICK)
SELECT *,
CASE
WHEN new_qty > qty THEN new_qty
ELSE qty
END AS order_shortfall
FROM STOCK_POST_ORDER
WHERE new_qty < 0
ORDER BY placeb,
picktime,
product
现在按顺序分区的总和是 SQL 服务器 2012+ 但是我有两台服务器 运行 2008 年所以需要转换...
预期结果:
+--------+--------+----------+---------+-----------+-------+---------+-----------------+
| PlaceA | PlaceB | Picktime | product | Prd_Descr | qty | new_qty | order_shortfall |
+--------+--------+----------+---------+-----------+-------+---------+-----------------+
| BW | AMES | 16:00 | 1356 | Product A | -1330 | -17 | -17 |
| BW | AMES | 16:00 | 17 | Product B | -48 | -42 | -42 |
| BW | AMES | 17:00 | 1356 | Product A | -840 | -857 | -840 |
| BW | AMES | 18:00 | 1356 | Product A | -770 | -1627 | -770 |
| BW | AMES | 18:00 | 17 | Product B | -528 | -570 | -528 |
| BW | AMES | 19:00 | 1356 | Product A | -700 | -2327 | -700 |
| BW | AMES | 20:00 | 1356 | Product A | -910 | -3237 | -910 |
| BW | AMES | 20:00 | 8009 | Product C | -192 | -52 | -52 |
| BW | AMES | 20:00 | 897 | Product D | -90 | -10 | -10 |
+--------+--------+----------+---------+-----------+-------+---------+-----------------+
一种直接的方法是在 CROSS APPLY
.
如果您的 table 或多或少很大,那么您的下一个问题就是如何让它变快。 PlaceB, Product, PickTime INCLUDE (Qty)
上的索引应该有所帮助。但是,如果你的 table 真的很大,光标会更好。
WITH
ADVPICK
AS
(
SELECT 'A' as PlaceA,PlaceB, case when PickTime = '00:00' then '07:00' else isnull(picktime,'12:00') end as picktime, cast(Product as int) as product, Prd_Description, -Qty AS Qty FROM t_pick_orders
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A' as PlaceA,PlaceB, '0', cast(Code as int) as product, NULL, Stock FROM t_pick_stock
)
,stock_post_order
AS
(
SELECT
*
FROM
ADVPICK AS Main
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT SUM(Sub.Qty) AS new_qty
FROM ADVPICK AS Sub
WHERE
Sub.PlaceB = Main.PlaceB
AND Sub.Product = Main.Product
AND T.PickTime <= Main.PickTime
) AS A
)
SELECT
*,
CASE WHEN new_qty > qty THEN new_qty ELSE qty END AS order_shortfall
FROM
stock_post_order
WHERE
new_qty < 0
ORDER BY PlaceB, picktime, product;
哦,如果 (PlaceB, Product, PickTime)
不是唯一的,您将获得与使用 SUM() OVER
的原始查询不同的结果。如果您需要完全相同的结果,则需要使用一些额外的列(如 ID
)来解决关系。