变体类型 k 没有构造函数 S
Variant type k has no constructor S
我正在尝试使用具有以下签名的消息传递接口模块编写并行前缀扫描的实现
module type S = sig
type ('s, 'r) channel
val spawn : (('r, 's) channel -> 'a -> unit) -> 'a -> ('s, 'r) channel
val send : ('s, 'r) channel -> 's -> unit
val receive : ('s, 'r) channel -> 'r
val wait_die : ('s, 'r) channel -> unit
end
module Mpi : S
我使用 Mpi 模块编写了一个并行前缀扫描的实现。
val scan: ('a -> 'a -> 'a) -> 'a -> 'a t -> 'a t
type 'a t = 'a array
type 'a receive_message = Seq of 'a t | Kill
type 'a ctree = Leaf of 'a * 'a | Node of 'a ctree * 'a * 'a * 'a ctree
type 'a down_incoming = In of 'a ctree * 'a | Kill
let scan (f: 'a -> 'a -> 'a) (base: 'a) (seq: 'a t) : 'a t =
let rec up_handler ch () =
let rec aux () =
match Mpi.receive ch with
Kill -> ()
| Seq s -> (
let n = length s in
match n with
0 -> failwith "error usage"
| 1 -> Mpi.send ch (Leaf (nth s 0,base)); aux ()
| _ ->
let mid = n / 2 in
let l,r = Mpi.spawn up_handler (), Mpi.spawn up_handler () in
Mpi.send l (Seq (Array.sub s 0 mid));Mpi.send r (Seq (Array.sub s mid (n - mid)));
let result = (
match (Mpi.receive l, Mpi.receive r) with
(Leaf (lacc,_) as l_ans), (Leaf (racc,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
| (Leaf (lacc,_) as l_ans), (Node (_,racc,_,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
| (Node (_,lacc,_,_) as l_ans), (Leaf (racc,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
| (Node (_,lacc,_,_) as l_ans), (Node (_,racc,_,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
) in
Mpi.send ch result;Mpi.send l Kill;Mpi.send r Kill;
Mpi.wait_die l;Mpi.wait_die r; aux () )
in aux ()
in
let rec down_handler ch () =
let rec aux () =
match Mpi.receive ch with
Kill -> ()
| In (Leaf (acc,_), p) -> Mpi.send ch (singleton (f p acc)); aux ()
| In (Node ( ( (Leaf (lacc,_) | Node (_,lacc,_,_)) as left),acc,_,right), p) ->
let l, r = Mpi.spawn down_handler (), Mpi.spawn down_handler () in
Mpi.send l (In (left, p));Mpi.send r (In (right,f p lacc));
let l_ans, r_ans = Mpi.receive l, Mpi.receive r in
let _ = Mpi.send l Kill, Mpi.send r Kill in
Mpi.wait_die l;Mpi.wait_die r;
let result = (append l_ans r_ans) in
Mpi.send ch result; aux ()
in aux ()
in
match length seq with
0 -> [||]
| _ ->
let up_ch = Mpi.spawn up_handler () in
Mpi.send up_ch (Seq seq);
let up_ans = Mpi.receive up_ch in
let _ = Mpi.send up_ch Kill in
Mpi.wait_die up_ch;
let down_ch = Mpi.spawn down_handler () in
Mpi.send down_ch (In (up_ans,base));
let down_ans = Mpi.receive down_ch in
let _ = Mpi.send down_ch Kill in
Mpi.wait_die down_ch;
down_ans
当我尝试编译时出现错误
"Error: The variant type down_incoming has no constructor Seq" 这没有意义,因为它应该与 'receive_message' 类型匹配。
这是因为 Kill
在匹配中排在第一位,并将推断该类型是具有该变体的最新类型。调换顺序就好了
match Mpi.receive ch with
| Seq s -> ...
| Kill -> ()
...
match Mpi.receive ch with
| In (Leaf (acc,_), p) -> ...
| Kill -> ()
与其在两个地方像这样使用 Kill,不如考虑在 In
或 Seq
类型参数周围使用 option
。
type 'a receive_message = 'a t option
type 'a down_incoming = ('a ctree * 'a) option
由于您的两种类型都有一个构造函数 Kill
,最后一个在模式匹配中默认使用。因此,当遍历 up_handler
和 aux
函数时,由于尚未推断出 ch
的类型,因此(错误地)推断它的类型为 down_incoming
.
解决方法:
- 更改模式匹配顺序(在
Kill
之前处理 Seq
)。
- 手动将
ch
与类型 receive_message
统一 (let rec up_handler (ch:receive_message) () = ...
)。
- 给你的构造函数起不同的名字。
请注意,由于这三种解决方案将生成相同的代码,因此您可以选择自己喜欢的方式(我的方式是第二种)。
我正在尝试使用具有以下签名的消息传递接口模块编写并行前缀扫描的实现
module type S = sig
type ('s, 'r) channel
val spawn : (('r, 's) channel -> 'a -> unit) -> 'a -> ('s, 'r) channel
val send : ('s, 'r) channel -> 's -> unit
val receive : ('s, 'r) channel -> 'r
val wait_die : ('s, 'r) channel -> unit
end
module Mpi : S
我使用 Mpi 模块编写了一个并行前缀扫描的实现。
val scan: ('a -> 'a -> 'a) -> 'a -> 'a t -> 'a t
type 'a t = 'a array
type 'a receive_message = Seq of 'a t | Kill
type 'a ctree = Leaf of 'a * 'a | Node of 'a ctree * 'a * 'a * 'a ctree
type 'a down_incoming = In of 'a ctree * 'a | Kill
let scan (f: 'a -> 'a -> 'a) (base: 'a) (seq: 'a t) : 'a t =
let rec up_handler ch () =
let rec aux () =
match Mpi.receive ch with
Kill -> ()
| Seq s -> (
let n = length s in
match n with
0 -> failwith "error usage"
| 1 -> Mpi.send ch (Leaf (nth s 0,base)); aux ()
| _ ->
let mid = n / 2 in
let l,r = Mpi.spawn up_handler (), Mpi.spawn up_handler () in
Mpi.send l (Seq (Array.sub s 0 mid));Mpi.send r (Seq (Array.sub s mid (n - mid)));
let result = (
match (Mpi.receive l, Mpi.receive r) with
(Leaf (lacc,_) as l_ans), (Leaf (racc,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
| (Leaf (lacc,_) as l_ans), (Node (_,racc,_,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
| (Node (_,lacc,_,_) as l_ans), (Leaf (racc,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
| (Node (_,lacc,_,_) as l_ans), (Node (_,racc,_,_) as r_ans) -> Node (l_ans,f lacc racc,base,r_ans)
) in
Mpi.send ch result;Mpi.send l Kill;Mpi.send r Kill;
Mpi.wait_die l;Mpi.wait_die r; aux () )
in aux ()
in
let rec down_handler ch () =
let rec aux () =
match Mpi.receive ch with
Kill -> ()
| In (Leaf (acc,_), p) -> Mpi.send ch (singleton (f p acc)); aux ()
| In (Node ( ( (Leaf (lacc,_) | Node (_,lacc,_,_)) as left),acc,_,right), p) ->
let l, r = Mpi.spawn down_handler (), Mpi.spawn down_handler () in
Mpi.send l (In (left, p));Mpi.send r (In (right,f p lacc));
let l_ans, r_ans = Mpi.receive l, Mpi.receive r in
let _ = Mpi.send l Kill, Mpi.send r Kill in
Mpi.wait_die l;Mpi.wait_die r;
let result = (append l_ans r_ans) in
Mpi.send ch result; aux ()
in aux ()
in
match length seq with
0 -> [||]
| _ ->
let up_ch = Mpi.spawn up_handler () in
Mpi.send up_ch (Seq seq);
let up_ans = Mpi.receive up_ch in
let _ = Mpi.send up_ch Kill in
Mpi.wait_die up_ch;
let down_ch = Mpi.spawn down_handler () in
Mpi.send down_ch (In (up_ans,base));
let down_ans = Mpi.receive down_ch in
let _ = Mpi.send down_ch Kill in
Mpi.wait_die down_ch;
down_ans
当我尝试编译时出现错误 "Error: The variant type down_incoming has no constructor Seq" 这没有意义,因为它应该与 'receive_message' 类型匹配。
这是因为 Kill
在匹配中排在第一位,并将推断该类型是具有该变体的最新类型。调换顺序就好了
match Mpi.receive ch with
| Seq s -> ...
| Kill -> ()
...
match Mpi.receive ch with
| In (Leaf (acc,_), p) -> ...
| Kill -> ()
与其在两个地方像这样使用 Kill,不如考虑在 In
或 Seq
类型参数周围使用 option
。
type 'a receive_message = 'a t option
type 'a down_incoming = ('a ctree * 'a) option
由于您的两种类型都有一个构造函数 Kill
,最后一个在模式匹配中默认使用。因此,当遍历 up_handler
和 aux
函数时,由于尚未推断出 ch
的类型,因此(错误地)推断它的类型为 down_incoming
.
解决方法:
- 更改模式匹配顺序(在
Kill
之前处理Seq
)。 - 手动将
ch
与类型receive_message
统一 (let rec up_handler (ch:receive_message) () = ...
)。 - 给你的构造函数起不同的名字。
请注意,由于这三种解决方案将生成相同的代码,因此您可以选择自己喜欢的方式(我的方式是第二种)。