(Java) 字母子串比较以错误结果结束
(Java) alphabetic substring comparison ends up with a wrong result
在其中一项 HackerRank Java 挑战中,有一个问题被定义为:
问题
We define the following terms:
Lexicographical Order, also known as alphabetic or dictionary order, orders characters as follows: A < B < ...< Y < Z < a < b
... < y < z
A substring of a string is a contiguous block of characters in the string. For example, the substrings of abc are a, b, c, ab, bc, and abc.
Given a string, s, and an integer, k, complete the
function so that it finds the lexicographically smallest and
largest substrings of length k.
这是我的(不完全有效的)解决方案:
我的代码
import java.util.*;
public class stringCompare {
public static String getSmallestAndLargest(String s, int k) {
String smallest, largest, temp;
/* Initially, define the smallest and largest substrings as the first k chars */
smallest = s.substring(0, k);
largest = s.substring(0, k);
for (int i = 0; i <= s.length() - k; i++) {
temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) {
/* Check if the first char of the next substring is greater than the largest ones' */
if (temp.charAt(j) > largest.charAt(j)) {
largest = s.substring(i, i + k);
break;
}
/* Check if the first char of the next substring is less than the smallest ones' */
else if (temp.charAt(j) < smallest.charAt(j)) {
smallest = s.substring(i, i + k);
break;
}
/* Check if the first char of the next substring is either equal to smallest or largest substrings' */
else if (temp.charAt(j) == smallest.charAt(j)
|| temp.charAt(j) == largest.charAt(j)) {
// If so, move to the next char till it becomes different
}
/* If the first of char of the next substring is neither of these (between smallest and largest ones')
skip that substring */
else {
break;
}
}
}
return smallest + "\n" + largest;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
String s;
int k;
try (Scanner scan = new Scanner(System.in)) {
s = scan.next();
k = scan.nextInt();
}
System.out.println(getSmallestAndLargest(s, k));
}
}
根据 HackerRank,此代码在 6 个案例中有 2 个失败。一则如下:
ASDFHDSFHsdlfhsdlfLDFHSDLFHsdlfhsdlhkfsdlfLHDFLSDKFHsdfhsdlkfhsdlfhsLFDLSFHSDLFHsdkfhsdkfhsdkfhsdfhsdfjeaDFHSDLFHDFlajfsdlfhsdlfhDSLFHSDLFHdlfhs
30
预期输出为:
ASDFHDSFHsdlfhsdlfLDFHSDLFHsdl
sdlkfhsdlfhsLFDLSFHSDLFHsdkfhs
但是我的变成了:
DFHSDLFHDFlajfsdlfhsdlfhDSLFHS
sdlkfhsdlfhsLFDLSFHSDLFHsdkfhs
在调试模式下,我发现最小的子串直到第67次迭代(i)都是正确的。我不知道为什么它会在那一步变成错误的,但确实如此。
谁能帮我解决这个问题?
谢谢!
问题是您正在尝试在单个循环中比较最大和最小。更具体地说,这一行有问题:
else if (temp.charAt(j) == smallest.charAt(j)
|| temp.charAt(j) == largest.charAt(j)) {
// If so, move to the next char till it becomes different
}
您可能希望在 j
上继续循环以检测最小的子字符串,但在 j
上跳出循环以检测最大的子字符串。这就是为什么这两项检查应该相互独立地进行。
需要考虑的几个小问题:
- 不需要写
largest = s.substring(i, i + k)
,因为和largest = temp
一样; smallest
. 也是如此
- 您根本不需要嵌套循环
compareTo
为您执行字典序比较。
基本上,您的程序可以简化为:
largest = smallest = s.substring(0, k);
for (int i = 1 ; i <= s.length() - k; i++) {
temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
if (temp.compareTo(largest) > 0) {
largestt = temp;
} else if (temp.compareTo(smallest) < 0) {
smalles = temp;
}
}
请注意,循环可以从 i = 1
开始,因为您使用 s.substring(0, k)
初始化了 largest
和 smallest
。
您不能同时将某个子串与迄今为止最小的和迄今为止最大的进行比较。特别是条件
temp.charAt(j) == smallest.charAt(j)
|| temp.charAt(j) == largest.charAt(j)
有问题。举个例子
smallest ad
largest bx
temp bc
在此示例中,您的代码将得出结论 bc 小于 ad
我提出一个简单的优化:快速浏览一下第一个字符。
largest = smallest = s.substring(0, k);
for (int i = 1; i <= s.length() - k; i++) {
if (s.charAt(i) > largest.charAt(0) ){
largest = s.substring(i, i + k);
continue;
}
if (s.charAt(i) < smallest.charAt(0) ){
smallest = s.substring(i, i + k);
continue;
}
if (s.charAt(i) == largest.charAt(0) ){
String temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
if( temp.compareTo(largest) > 0) {
largest = temp;
continue;
}
}
if (s.charAt(i) == smallest.charAt(0) ){
String temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
if( temp.compareTo(smallest) < 0) {
smallest = temp;
}
}
}
例如,比较从 222 下降到 14。
在其中一项 HackerRank Java 挑战中,有一个问题被定义为:
问题
We define the following terms:
Lexicographical Order, also known as alphabetic or dictionary order, orders characters as follows: A < B < ...< Y < Z < a < b ... < y < z
A substring of a string is a contiguous block of characters in the string. For example, the substrings of abc are a, b, c, ab, bc, and abc.
Given a string, s, and an integer, k, complete the function so that it finds the lexicographically smallest and largest substrings of length k.
这是我的(不完全有效的)解决方案:
我的代码
import java.util.*;
public class stringCompare {
public static String getSmallestAndLargest(String s, int k) {
String smallest, largest, temp;
/* Initially, define the smallest and largest substrings as the first k chars */
smallest = s.substring(0, k);
largest = s.substring(0, k);
for (int i = 0; i <= s.length() - k; i++) {
temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) {
/* Check if the first char of the next substring is greater than the largest ones' */
if (temp.charAt(j) > largest.charAt(j)) {
largest = s.substring(i, i + k);
break;
}
/* Check if the first char of the next substring is less than the smallest ones' */
else if (temp.charAt(j) < smallest.charAt(j)) {
smallest = s.substring(i, i + k);
break;
}
/* Check if the first char of the next substring is either equal to smallest or largest substrings' */
else if (temp.charAt(j) == smallest.charAt(j)
|| temp.charAt(j) == largest.charAt(j)) {
// If so, move to the next char till it becomes different
}
/* If the first of char of the next substring is neither of these (between smallest and largest ones')
skip that substring */
else {
break;
}
}
}
return smallest + "\n" + largest;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
String s;
int k;
try (Scanner scan = new Scanner(System.in)) {
s = scan.next();
k = scan.nextInt();
}
System.out.println(getSmallestAndLargest(s, k));
}
}
根据 HackerRank,此代码在 6 个案例中有 2 个失败。一则如下:
ASDFHDSFHsdlfhsdlfLDFHSDLFHsdlfhsdlhkfsdlfLHDFLSDKFHsdfhsdlkfhsdlfhsLFDLSFHSDLFHsdkfhsdkfhsdkfhsdfhsdfjeaDFHSDLFHDFlajfsdlfhsdlfhDSLFHSDLFHdlfhs
30
预期输出为:
ASDFHDSFHsdlfhsdlfLDFHSDLFHsdl
sdlkfhsdlfhsLFDLSFHSDLFHsdkfhs
但是我的变成了:
DFHSDLFHDFlajfsdlfhsdlfhDSLFHS
sdlkfhsdlfhsLFDLSFHSDLFHsdkfhs
在调试模式下,我发现最小的子串直到第67次迭代(i)都是正确的。我不知道为什么它会在那一步变成错误的,但确实如此。
谁能帮我解决这个问题?
谢谢!
问题是您正在尝试在单个循环中比较最大和最小。更具体地说,这一行有问题:
else if (temp.charAt(j) == smallest.charAt(j)
|| temp.charAt(j) == largest.charAt(j)) {
// If so, move to the next char till it becomes different
}
您可能希望在 j
上继续循环以检测最小的子字符串,但在 j
上跳出循环以检测最大的子字符串。这就是为什么这两项检查应该相互独立地进行。
需要考虑的几个小问题:
- 不需要写
largest = s.substring(i, i + k)
,因为和largest = temp
一样;smallest
. 也是如此
- 您根本不需要嵌套循环
compareTo
为您执行字典序比较。
基本上,您的程序可以简化为:
largest = smallest = s.substring(0, k);
for (int i = 1 ; i <= s.length() - k; i++) {
temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
if (temp.compareTo(largest) > 0) {
largestt = temp;
} else if (temp.compareTo(smallest) < 0) {
smalles = temp;
}
}
请注意,循环可以从 i = 1
开始,因为您使用 s.substring(0, k)
初始化了 largest
和 smallest
。
您不能同时将某个子串与迄今为止最小的和迄今为止最大的进行比较。特别是条件
temp.charAt(j) == smallest.charAt(j)
|| temp.charAt(j) == largest.charAt(j)
有问题。举个例子
smallest ad
largest bx
temp bc
在此示例中,您的代码将得出结论 bc 小于 ad
我提出一个简单的优化:快速浏览一下第一个字符。
largest = smallest = s.substring(0, k);
for (int i = 1; i <= s.length() - k; i++) {
if (s.charAt(i) > largest.charAt(0) ){
largest = s.substring(i, i + k);
continue;
}
if (s.charAt(i) < smallest.charAt(0) ){
smallest = s.substring(i, i + k);
continue;
}
if (s.charAt(i) == largest.charAt(0) ){
String temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
if( temp.compareTo(largest) > 0) {
largest = temp;
continue;
}
}
if (s.charAt(i) == smallest.charAt(0) ){
String temp = s.substring(i, i + k);
if( temp.compareTo(smallest) < 0) {
smallest = temp;
}
}
}
例如,比较从 222 下降到 14。