为什么 dataclasses.astuple 返回 class 属性的深度拷贝?

Why is dataclasses.astuple returning a deepcopy of class attributes?

在下面的代码中,astuple 函数正在对数据 class 的 class 属性进行深度复制。为什么它不会产生与函数 my_tuple 相同的结果?

import copy
import dataclasses


@dataclasses.dataclass
class Demo:
    a_number: int
    a_bool: bool
    classy: 'YOhY'

    def my_tuple(self):
        return self.a_number, self.a_bool, self.classy

class YOhY:
    def __repr__(self):
        return (self.__class__.__qualname__ + f" id={id(self)}")


why = YOhY()
print(why)  # YOhY id=4369078368

demo = Demo(1, True, why)
print(demo)  # Demo(a_number=1, a_bool=True, classy=YOhY id=4369078368)

untrupled = demo.my_tuple()
print(untrupled)  # YOhY id=4369078368

trupled = dataclasses.astuple(demo)
print(trupled)  # YOhY id=4374460064

trupled2 = trupled
print(trupled2)  # YOhY id=4374460064

trupled3 = copy.copy(trupled)
print(trupled3)  # YOhY id=4374460064

trupled4 = copy.deepcopy(trupled)
print(trupled4)  # YOhY id=4374460176

脚注

由于 Anthony Sottile's 出色的响应清楚地表明这是编码到 Python 3.7 中的行为。任何希望 astuple 以与 collections.namedtuple 相同的方式解压的人都需要将其替换为类似于 Demo.my_tuple 的方法。下面的代码没有 my_tuple 脆弱,因为如果数据 class 的字段发生变化,它不需要修改。另一方面,如果 __slots__ 正在使用,它将不起作用。

只要 class 或其超 class 中存在 __hash__ 方法,两个版本的代码都会构成威胁。请参阅 Python 3.7 文档以了解 unsafe_hash,特别是 'Here are the rules governing implicit creation of a __hash__() method'.

开头的两段
def unsafe_astuple(self):
    return tuple([self.__dict__[field.name] for field in dataclasses.fields(self)])

这似乎是 astupleundocumented 行为(asdict 似乎也是)。

dataclasses.astuple(*, tuple_factory=tuple)

Converts the dataclass instance to a tuple (by using the factory function tuple_factory). Each dataclass is converted to a tuple of its field values. dataclasses, dicts, lists, and tuples are recursed into.

这是the source

def _asdict_inner(obj, dict_factory):
    if _is_dataclass_instance(obj):
        result = []
        for f in fields(obj):
            value = _asdict_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), dict_factory)
            result.append((f.name, value))
        return dict_factory(result)
    elif isinstance(obj, (list, tuple)):
        return type(obj)(_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj)
    elif isinstance(obj, dict):
        return type(obj)((_asdict_inner(k, dict_factory), _asdict_inner(v, dict_factory))
                          for k, v in obj.items())
    else:
return copy.deepcopy(obj)

这里的深层复制似乎是有意的,但可能应该记录在案。