打印免费的 monad
Printing the free monad
可以将自由 monad 转换为任何其他 monad,但给定类型 Free f x
的值,我想打印整棵树,而不是将生成的 AST 的每个节点映射到另一个节点中的某个其他节点单子。
Gabriel Gonzales uses 直接值
showProgram :: (Show a, Show r) => Free (Toy a) r -> String
showProgram (Free (Output a x)) =
"output " ++ show a ++ "\n" ++ showProgram x
showProgram (Free (Bell x)) =
"bell\n" ++ showProgram x
showProgram (Free Done) =
"done\n"
showProgram (Pure r) =
"return " ++ show r ++ "\n"
可以抽象为
showF :: (x -> b) -> ((Free f x -> b) -> f (Free f x) -> b) -> Free f x -> b
showF backLiftValue backLiftF = fix (showFU backLiftValue backLiftF)
where
showFU :: (x -> b) -> ((Free f x -> b) -> f (Free f x) -> b) -> (Free f x -> b) -> Free f x -> b
showFU backLiftValue backLiftF next = go . runIdentity . runFreeT where
go (FreeF c ) = backLiftF next c
go (Pure x) = backLiftValue x
如果我们有像这样的多态函数(使用 Choice x = Choice x x
作为函子)
,这很容易调用
showChoice :: forall x. (x -> String) -> Choice x -> String
showChoice show (Choice a b) = "Choice (" ++ show a ++ "," ++ show b ++ ")"
但这对于一个简单的操作来说似乎相当复杂......
从 f x -> b
到 Free f x -> b
还有哪些其他方法?
使用iter
和fmap
:
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor #-}
import Control.Monad.Free
data Choice x = Choice x x deriving (Functor)
-- iter :: Functor f => (f a -> a) -> Free f a -> a
-- iter _ (Pure a) = a
-- iter phi (Free m) = phi (iter phi <$> m)
showFreeChoice :: Show a => Free Choice a -> String
showFreeChoice =
iter (\(Choice l r) -> "(Choice " ++ l ++ " " ++ r ++ ")")
. fmap (\a -> "(Pure " ++ show a ++ ")")
fmap
将 Free f a
转换为 Free f b
,剩下的由 iter
完成。您可以将其排除在外,并可能获得更好的性能:
iter' :: Functor f => (f b -> b) -> (a -> b) -> Free f a -> b
iter' f g = go where
go (Pure a) = g a
go (Free fa) = f (go <$> fa)
可以将自由 monad 转换为任何其他 monad,但给定类型 Free f x
的值,我想打印整棵树,而不是将生成的 AST 的每个节点映射到另一个节点中的某个其他节点单子。
Gabriel Gonzales uses 直接值
showProgram :: (Show a, Show r) => Free (Toy a) r -> String
showProgram (Free (Output a x)) =
"output " ++ show a ++ "\n" ++ showProgram x
showProgram (Free (Bell x)) =
"bell\n" ++ showProgram x
showProgram (Free Done) =
"done\n"
showProgram (Pure r) =
"return " ++ show r ++ "\n"
可以抽象为
showF :: (x -> b) -> ((Free f x -> b) -> f (Free f x) -> b) -> Free f x -> b
showF backLiftValue backLiftF = fix (showFU backLiftValue backLiftF)
where
showFU :: (x -> b) -> ((Free f x -> b) -> f (Free f x) -> b) -> (Free f x -> b) -> Free f x -> b
showFU backLiftValue backLiftF next = go . runIdentity . runFreeT where
go (FreeF c ) = backLiftF next c
go (Pure x) = backLiftValue x
如果我们有像这样的多态函数(使用 Choice x = Choice x x
作为函子)
showChoice :: forall x. (x -> String) -> Choice x -> String
showChoice show (Choice a b) = "Choice (" ++ show a ++ "," ++ show b ++ ")"
但这对于一个简单的操作来说似乎相当复杂......
从 f x -> b
到 Free f x -> b
还有哪些其他方法?
使用iter
和fmap
:
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor #-}
import Control.Monad.Free
data Choice x = Choice x x deriving (Functor)
-- iter :: Functor f => (f a -> a) -> Free f a -> a
-- iter _ (Pure a) = a
-- iter phi (Free m) = phi (iter phi <$> m)
showFreeChoice :: Show a => Free Choice a -> String
showFreeChoice =
iter (\(Choice l r) -> "(Choice " ++ l ++ " " ++ r ++ ")")
. fmap (\a -> "(Pure " ++ show a ++ ")")
fmap
将 Free f a
转换为 Free f b
,剩下的由 iter
完成。您可以将其排除在外,并可能获得更好的性能:
iter' :: Functor f => (f b -> b) -> (a -> b) -> Free f a -> b
iter' f g = go where
go (Pure a) = g a
go (Free fa) = f (go <$> fa)