MySQL 简单的 COUNT 需要很长时间

MySQL Simple COUNT taking very long time

我有一个超过 870.000 行的数据库。每次我收到一个请求时,我都必须执行一个 COUNT 来检查一行是否存在。这些 COUNT 个请求在执行前最多需要 180 秒。这很长。

这是我的查询:

SELECT COUNT(0) AS aantal FROM milk_quotes WHERE shopId = '438' AND quoteId = '17424765'

EXPLAIN EXTENDED 显示:

id  select_type table   type    possible_keys   key key_len ref rows    filtered    Extra
1   SIMPLE  milk_quotes ref shopId  shopId  4   const   87648   100.00  Using where

而table结构是:

CREATE TABLE `milk_quotes ` (
  `id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `shopId` mediumint(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `quoteId` bigint(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `customerId` bigint(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `customerIP` int(11) unsigned DEFAULT NULL,
  `recoveryHash` char(32) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT NULL,
  `language` varchar(2) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT 'nl',
  `channel` varchar(11) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT NULL,
  `productsCount` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `isPaid` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '0',
  `isNotified` enum('0','1') CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT '0',
  `paymentId` varchar(50) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT NULL,
  `paymentCountry` varchar(2) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT NULL,
  `priceIncl` decimal(10,2) DEFAULT NULL,
  `createdAt` timestamp NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  `updatedAt` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
  `shopUpdatedAt` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
  `recalculatedAt` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
  `shopCreatedAt` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
  `firstReminder` mediumint(9) DEFAULT NULL,
  `secondReminder` mediumint(9) DEFAULT NULL,
  `thirdReminder` mediumint(9) DEFAULT NULL,
  `skipQuote` enum('1','0') DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `isPaid` (`isPaid`),
  KEY `shopId` (`shopId`),
  KEY `firstReminder` (`firstReminder`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=930952 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

Inno DB 变量:

have_innodb YES
ignore_builtin_innodb   OFF
innodb_adaptive_hash_index  ON
innodb_additional_mem_pool_size 1048576
innodb_autoextend_increment 8
innodb_autoinc_lock_mode    1
innodb_buffer_pool_size 8388608
innodb_checksums    ON
innodb_commit_concurrency   0
innodb_concurrency_tickets  500
innodb_data_file_path   ibdata1:10M:autoextend
innodb_data_home_dir    
innodb_doublewrite  ON
innodb_fast_shutdown    1
innodb_file_io_threads  4
innodb_file_per_table   OFF
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit  1
innodb_flush_method 
innodb_force_recovery   0
innodb_lock_wait_timeout    50
innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog  OFF
innodb_log_buffer_size  1048576
innodb_log_file_size    5242880
innodb_log_files_in_group   2
innodb_log_group_home_dir   ./
innodb_max_dirty_pages_pct  90
innodb_max_purge_lag    0
innodb_mirrored_log_groups  1
innodb_open_files   300
innodb_rollback_on_timeout  OFF
innodb_stats_on_metadata    ON
innodb_support_xa   ON
innodb_sync_spin_loops  20
innodb_table_locks  ON
innodb_thread_concurrency   8
innodb_thread_sleep_delay   10000
innodb_use_legacy_cardinality_algorithm ON

一个查询在每个查询中每个 table 只能使用一个索引;因此,如果您在单个查询中查找多个字段,则需要有一个涵盖所有这些字段的索引。在您的查询中,使用了 shopId 索引,但在其中 quoteId 是按顺序扫描的,这不是很好(我假设每个商店都有一堆 quoteId 行,是吗?)。尝试将架构中的 shopId 索引更改为

KEY `shopAndQuoteIds` (`shopId`, `quoteId`),

(如果你想在现有的 table 上执行此操作,我相信 ALTER TABLE aantal DROP INDEX shopId 后跟 ALTER TABLE aantal ADD KEY shopAndQuoteIds (shopId, quoteId) 应该执行此操作。在执行此操作之前请备份你的数据库!或者,您可以转储 table,将模式更改为上面的模式,然后将其重新导入。)

请注意,可以使用键的任何前缀;所以 (shopId, quoteId) 索引可用于 shopId 查询和 shopId + quoteId 查询,但不能用于 quoteId 查询。它仍然可以用于普通 shopId 查询这一事实意味着您通过创建这个新索引并删除旧的 shopId 索引不会有任何损失。