二维无约束 Nx1 阵列
2D Unconstrained Nx1 Array
我正在尝试创建一个灵活的常量数组。我想使用二维数组,有时可能是 2x1、2x2、3x2 数组等。例如:
type int_2d_array is array (integer range<>, integer range<>) of integer;
constant M : positive := 2;
constant nMax : positive := 1;
constant n : int_2d_array(M - 1 downto 0, nMax - 1 downto 0) := ( (1) , (2) ); -- wrong
error: type int_2d_array does not match with the integer literal
如果我这样做,它不会抱怨:
type int_2d_array is array (integer range<>, integer range<>) of integer;
constant M : positive := 2;
constant nMax : positive := 2;
constant n : int_2d_array(M - 1 downto 0, nMax - 1 downto 0) := ( ( 0,1 ) , ( 2,2 )); -- accepted
第一个示例是否可以使用二维数组?
我设法用下面丑陋的方式编译了第一个例子:
type int_2d_array is array (integer range<>, integer range<>) of integer;
constant M : positive := 2;
constant nMax : positive := 1;
constant n : int_2d_array(M - 1 downto 0, nMax - 1 downto 0) := ( (others => 1) , (others => 2) );
确实是奇怪的行为。
LRM(第 9.3.3 节聚合)指出:
Aggregates containing a single element association
shall always be specified using named association in order to distinguish them from parenthesized expressions.
所以,这没问题:
constant n : int_1d_array(0 downto 0) := ( 0 => 1 );
这不是:
constant n : int_1d_array(0 downto 0) := ( 1 );
我正在尝试创建一个灵活的常量数组。我想使用二维数组,有时可能是 2x1、2x2、3x2 数组等。例如:
type int_2d_array is array (integer range<>, integer range<>) of integer;
constant M : positive := 2;
constant nMax : positive := 1;
constant n : int_2d_array(M - 1 downto 0, nMax - 1 downto 0) := ( (1) , (2) ); -- wrong
error: type int_2d_array does not match with the integer literal
如果我这样做,它不会抱怨:
type int_2d_array is array (integer range<>, integer range<>) of integer;
constant M : positive := 2;
constant nMax : positive := 2;
constant n : int_2d_array(M - 1 downto 0, nMax - 1 downto 0) := ( ( 0,1 ) , ( 2,2 )); -- accepted
第一个示例是否可以使用二维数组?
我设法用下面丑陋的方式编译了第一个例子:
type int_2d_array is array (integer range<>, integer range<>) of integer;
constant M : positive := 2;
constant nMax : positive := 1;
constant n : int_2d_array(M - 1 downto 0, nMax - 1 downto 0) := ( (others => 1) , (others => 2) );
确实是奇怪的行为。
LRM(第 9.3.3 节聚合)指出:
Aggregates containing a single element association shall always be specified using named association in order to distinguish them from parenthesized expressions.
所以,这没问题:
constant n : int_1d_array(0 downto 0) := ( 0 => 1 );
这不是:
constant n : int_1d_array(0 downto 0) := ( 1 );