为什么从 getopt_long() 省略这一行会导致段错误?
Why does ommitting this one line from getopt_long() make a segfault?
在我使用gcc -Wall getopt.c -o options
和运行编译了几个例子之后,乍一看似乎是可行的。故意将其绊倒会导致段错误。
//straight from the man page
static struct option long_options[] = {
{"add", required_argument, 0, 0 },
{"append", no_argument, 0, 0 },
{"delete", required_argument, 0, 0 },
{"verbose", no_argument, 0, 0 },
{"create", required_argument, 0, 'c'},
{"file", required_argument, 0, 0 },
{0, 0, 0, 0 } //<-- if i omit this line, it segfaults
};
为什么我省略那一行会导致段错误?
或者更确切地说,以不同的方式提问
为什么我必须将最后一组 struct option array
成员初始化为 null?
来自man
The last element of the array has to be filled with zeros.
struct option {
const char *name;
int has_arg;
int *flag;
int val;
};
The meanings of the different fields are:
name is the name of the long option.
has_arg
is: no_argument (or 0) if the option does not take an
argument; required_argument (or 1) if the option requires an
argument; or optional_argument (or 2) if the option takes an
optional argument.
flag specifies how results are returned for a long option. If flag
is NULL, then getopt_long() returns val. (For example, the
calling program may set val to the equivalent short option
character.) Otherwise, getopt_long() returns 0, and flag
points to a variable which is set to val if the option is
found, but left unchanged if the option is not found.
val is the value to return, or to load into the variable pointed
to by flag.
The last element of the array has to be filled with zeros.
If longindex is not NULL, it points to a variable which is set to the
index of the long option relative to longopts.
简单。所以处理数组的代码知道它何时结束。它被称为哨兵。
在我使用gcc -Wall getopt.c -o options
和运行编译了几个例子之后,乍一看似乎是可行的。故意将其绊倒会导致段错误。
//straight from the man page
static struct option long_options[] = {
{"add", required_argument, 0, 0 },
{"append", no_argument, 0, 0 },
{"delete", required_argument, 0, 0 },
{"verbose", no_argument, 0, 0 },
{"create", required_argument, 0, 'c'},
{"file", required_argument, 0, 0 },
{0, 0, 0, 0 } //<-- if i omit this line, it segfaults
};
为什么我省略那一行会导致段错误?
或者更确切地说,以不同的方式提问
为什么我必须将最后一组 struct option array
成员初始化为 null?
来自man
The last element of the array has to be filled with zeros.
struct option { const char *name; int has_arg; int *flag; int val; }; The meanings of the different fields are: name is the name of the long option. has_arg is: no_argument (or 0) if the option does not take an argument; required_argument (or 1) if the option requires an argument; or optional_argument (or 2) if the option takes an optional argument. flag specifies how results are returned for a long option. If flag is NULL, then getopt_long() returns val. (For example, the calling program may set val to the equivalent short option character.) Otherwise, getopt_long() returns 0, and flag points to a variable which is set to val if the option is found, but left unchanged if the option is not found. val is the value to return, or to load into the variable pointed to by flag. The last element of the array has to be filled with zeros. If longindex is not NULL, it points to a variable which is set to the index of the long option relative to longopts.
简单。所以处理数组的代码知道它何时结束。它被称为哨兵。