为什么 STL 需要一个临时迭代器变量来编译它?

Why STL requires a temporary iterator variable to compile this?

这是一段非常简单的代码:

#include <vector>

int main() {

    std::vector<int> myVec(5);
    std::vector<int>::const_iterator first = myVec.begin();
    std::vector<int>::const_iterator last = myVec.begin() + 3;
    std::vector<int> newVec1(first, last);
    std::vector<int> newVec2(myVec.begin(), last);

    return 0;
}

声明 newVec1 编译的行。

行声明 newVec2 失败并出现以下错误:

prog.cpp: In function 'int main()':
prog.cpp:11:49: error: no matching function for call to 'std::vector<int>::vector(std::vector<int>::iterator, std::vector<int>::const_iterator&)'
     std::vector<int> newVec2(myVec.begin(), last);
                                                 ^
prog.cpp:11:49: note: candidates are:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/vector:64:0,
                 from prog.cpp:3:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:401:9: note: template<class _InputIterator, class> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, const allocator_type&)
         vector(_InputIterator __first, _InputIterator __last,
         ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:401:9: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
prog.cpp:11:49: note:   deduced conflicting types for parameter '_InputIterator' ('__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >' and '__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<const int*, std::vector<int> >')
     std::vector<int> newVec2(myVec.begin(), last);
                                                 ^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/vector:64:0,
                 from prog.cpp:3:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:373:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::initializer_list<_Tp>, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(initializer_list<value_type> __l,
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:373:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from 'std::vector<int>::iterator {aka __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >}' to 'std::initializer_list<int>'
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:348:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(vector&& __rv, const allocator_type& __m)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:348:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from 'std::vector<int>::iterator {aka __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >}' to 'std::vector<int>&&'
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:339:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(const vector& __x, const allocator_type& __a)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:339:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from 'std::vector<int>::iterator {aka __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >}' to 'const std::vector<int>&'
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:335:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(vector&& __x) noexcept
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:335:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:318:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(const vector& __x)
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:318:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:289:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type, const value_type&, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type = unsigned int; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::value_type = int; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(size_type __n, const value_type& __value,
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:289:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from 'std::vector<int>::iterator {aka __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >}' to 'std::vector<int>::size_type {aka unsigned int}'
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:277:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type, const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type = unsigned int; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(size_type __n, const allocator_type& __a = allocator_type())
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:277:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from 'std::vector<int>::iterator {aka __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >}' to 'std::vector<int>::size_type {aka unsigned int}'
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:264:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(const allocator_type&) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator<int>]
       vector(const allocator_type& __a) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:264:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:253:7: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector() [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]
       vector()
       ^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_vector.h:253:7: note:   candidate expects 0 arguments, 2 provided

g++ 和 Visual Studio 都编译失败,知道为什么吗? myVec.begin() 等同于 first...

myVec.begin()first 不同。 firststd::vector<int>::const_iterator 类型,而 myVec.begin()std::vector<int>::iterator.

类型

如果你想要一个 const 迭代器,使用 cbegin:

std::vector<int> newVec2(myVec.cbegin(), last);

vec.begin()first 不同,因为它 return 你是一个迭代器,而不是 const_iterator.

发生这种情况是因为拥有 const 或非 const 迭代器取决于您对容器的访问类型,而不是取决于您希望对迭代器进行的使用,这也是例如创建的原因代理是在类似数组的对象中将读取与写入操作分开的唯一方法 ::operator[] 而不是仅仅依赖 const 或非 const 版本。

这只是常量正确性概念显示其局限性的许多情况。