@Dependent CDI 注解是否被子类继承？
Is the @Dependent CDI annotation inherited by subclasses?
我有这些 类:
@Dependent
public abstract class ClassA{...}
public class ClassB extends ClassA{...}
public class ClassC{
@Inject
private ClassB classB;
}
那么，当classC的实例被销毁时，注入到classC的实例中的classB的实例会被销毁吗？换句话说就是
@Dependent CDI 注释被 sub类?
继承
这是 CDI 1.0 spec 中的相关部分。注意第二个要点：
Suppose a class X is extended directly or indirectly by the bean class
of a managed bean or session bean Y.
If X is annotated with a qualifier type, stereotype or interceptor binding type Z then Y inherits the annotation if and only if Z
declares the @Inherited meta-annotation and neither Y nor any
intermediate class that is a subclass of X and a superclass of Y
declares an annotation of type Z.
(This behavior is defined by the Java Language Specification.)
If X is annotated with a scope type Z then Y inherits the annotation if and only if Z declares the @Inherited meta-annotation
and neither Y nor any intermediate class that is a subclass of X and a
superclass of Y declares a scope type.
(This behavior is different to what is defined in the Java Language
Specification.)
A scope type explicitly declared by X and inherited by Y from X takes
precedence over default scopes of stereotypes declared or inherited by
Y.
由于 @Dependent 伪作用域确实具有 @Inherited 元注释，如果子 class 或任何中介 class 都没有，则该作用域被继承范围注释（如您的示例所示）。
因为 @Dependent 范围是默认范围，所以我认为这两种方式都没有太大关系。
我有这些 类:
@Dependent
public abstract class ClassA{...}
public class ClassB extends ClassA{...}
public class ClassC{
@Inject
private ClassB classB;
}
那么，当classC的实例被销毁时，注入到classC的实例中的classB的实例会被销毁吗？换句话说就是
@Dependent CDI 注释被 sub类?
这是 CDI 1.0 spec 中的相关部分。注意第二个要点：
Suppose a class X is extended directly or indirectly by the bean class of a managed bean or session bean Y.
If X is annotated with a qualifier type, stereotype or interceptor binding type Z then Y inherits the annotation if and only if Z declares the
@Inheritedmeta-annotation and neither Y nor any intermediate class that is a subclass of X and a superclass of Y declares an annotation of type Z.
(This behavior is defined by the Java Language Specification.)If X is annotated with a scope type Z then Y inherits the annotation if and only if Z declares the
@Inheritedmeta-annotation and neither Y nor any intermediate class that is a subclass of X and a superclass of Y declares a scope type.
(This behavior is different to what is defined in the Java Language Specification.)A scope type explicitly declared by X and inherited by Y from X takes precedence over default scopes of stereotypes declared or inherited by Y.
由于 @Dependent 伪作用域确实具有 @Inherited 元注释，如果子 class 或任何中介 class 都没有，则该作用域被继承范围注释（如您的示例所示）。
因为 @Dependent 范围是默认范围，所以我认为这两种方式都没有太大关系。