用于在两个数组之间的相同位置上查找相同数字的递归函数
Recursive function for finding same numbers on same positions between two arrays
下面是结果的示例:
1234 和 1344 有两个数字在相同的位置。
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int Proverka(int *num1[], int *num2[], int len, int pom)
{
if (len < 1 && pom < 1)
return 0;
if (*num1 == *num2)
return 1 + Proverka(num1++, num2++, len-1, pom-1);
else {
return Proverka(num1++, num2++, len-1, pom-1);
}
}
int main (void)
{
int *num1[5], *num2[5], pom, len, i, sin, j;
pom = sizeof(num1) / sizeof(num1[0]);
len = sizeof(num2) / sizeof(num2[0]);
for (i = 0; i < pom; i++) {
printf("Enter elements for first array :");
scanf("%d", num1[i]);
}
for (j = 0; j < len; j++){
printf("Enter elements for second array : ");
scanf("%d", num2[j]);
}
sin = Proverka(num1, num2, pom, len);
{
printf("They have %d numbers on same positions", sin);
}
return 0;
}
int *num1[5],*num2[5] ... 不会为您提供分配了内存的整数指针数组。解决这个问题。使用 malloc 分配内存。
或者只说 int num1[5],num2[5]
和 scanf("%d",&num1[i]);
您的代码中有很多错误,这是它的工作版本。
阅读评论以了解我所做的更改。
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int Proverka(int *num1, int *num2, int len1, int len2)
{
if (len1 < 1 && len2 < 1) return 0;
// note the pre-increment. Your post-increment wouldn't have worked. Or just add 1.
return (*num1 == *num2) + Proverka(++num1, ++num2, len1 - 1, len2 - 1);
// this works, since "boolean" is really just 0 or 1
}
int main (void)
{
// I make array of ints, not of pointers to ints.
int num1[5], num2[5], len1, len2, i, same;
len1 = sizeof(num1) / sizeof(num1[0]);
len2 = sizeof(num2) / sizeof(num2[0]);
for (i = 0; i < len1; i++) {
printf("First array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &num1[i]); // pointer at the element
}
for (i = 0; i < len2; i++){
printf("Second array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &num2[i]);
}
// get pointers at the first array elements
same = Proverka(&num1[0], &num2[0], len1, len2);
printf("They have %d numbers on same positions\n", same); // newline - good practice
return 0;
}
这里有更多 "optimized" 和清理版本:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#define ITEMS 5
int Proverka(const int *aa, const int *bb, const int len)
{
if (len == 0) return 0;
return (*aa == *bb) + Proverka(1 + aa, 1 + bb, len - 1);
}
int main (void)
{
int aa[ITEMS], bb[ITEMS], i, same;
for (i = 0; i < ITEMS; i++) {
printf("First array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &aa[i]);
}
for (i = 0; i < ITEMS; i++) {
printf("Second array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &bb[i]);
}
same = Proverka(&aa[0], &bb[0], ITEMS);
printf("They have %d numbers on same positions\n", same);
return 0;
}
为此使用递归不是一个很好的选择,循环会更容易和更安全。但这也适用于不太大的数组。
下面是结果的示例:
1234 和 1344 有两个数字在相同的位置。
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int Proverka(int *num1[], int *num2[], int len, int pom)
{
if (len < 1 && pom < 1)
return 0;
if (*num1 == *num2)
return 1 + Proverka(num1++, num2++, len-1, pom-1);
else {
return Proverka(num1++, num2++, len-1, pom-1);
}
}
int main (void)
{
int *num1[5], *num2[5], pom, len, i, sin, j;
pom = sizeof(num1) / sizeof(num1[0]);
len = sizeof(num2) / sizeof(num2[0]);
for (i = 0; i < pom; i++) {
printf("Enter elements for first array :");
scanf("%d", num1[i]);
}
for (j = 0; j < len; j++){
printf("Enter elements for second array : ");
scanf("%d", num2[j]);
}
sin = Proverka(num1, num2, pom, len);
{
printf("They have %d numbers on same positions", sin);
}
return 0;
}
int *num1[5],*num2[5] ... 不会为您提供分配了内存的整数指针数组。解决这个问题。使用 malloc 分配内存。
或者只说 int num1[5],num2[5]
和 scanf("%d",&num1[i]);
您的代码中有很多错误,这是它的工作版本。
阅读评论以了解我所做的更改。
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int Proverka(int *num1, int *num2, int len1, int len2)
{
if (len1 < 1 && len2 < 1) return 0;
// note the pre-increment. Your post-increment wouldn't have worked. Or just add 1.
return (*num1 == *num2) + Proverka(++num1, ++num2, len1 - 1, len2 - 1);
// this works, since "boolean" is really just 0 or 1
}
int main (void)
{
// I make array of ints, not of pointers to ints.
int num1[5], num2[5], len1, len2, i, same;
len1 = sizeof(num1) / sizeof(num1[0]);
len2 = sizeof(num2) / sizeof(num2[0]);
for (i = 0; i < len1; i++) {
printf("First array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &num1[i]); // pointer at the element
}
for (i = 0; i < len2; i++){
printf("Second array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &num2[i]);
}
// get pointers at the first array elements
same = Proverka(&num1[0], &num2[0], len1, len2);
printf("They have %d numbers on same positions\n", same); // newline - good practice
return 0;
}
这里有更多 "optimized" 和清理版本:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#define ITEMS 5
int Proverka(const int *aa, const int *bb, const int len)
{
if (len == 0) return 0;
return (*aa == *bb) + Proverka(1 + aa, 1 + bb, len - 1);
}
int main (void)
{
int aa[ITEMS], bb[ITEMS], i, same;
for (i = 0; i < ITEMS; i++) {
printf("First array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &aa[i]);
}
for (i = 0; i < ITEMS; i++) {
printf("Second array element %d:", i+1);
scanf("%d", &bb[i]);
}
same = Proverka(&aa[0], &bb[0], ITEMS);
printf("They have %d numbers on same positions\n", same);
return 0;
}
为此使用递归不是一个很好的选择,循环会更容易和更安全。但这也适用于不太大的数组。