Android RecyclerView notifyItemRangeChanged 与 notifyItemChanged
Android RecyclerView notifyItemRangeChanged vs notifyItemChanged
我有一个数据集,它可能会在刷新时发生变化。很难确定现有数据集中的哪些条目已更改。我通读了 recyclerview 适配器说明,我的主要问题是。
确定更改了哪个数据视图,然后对受影响的范围使用 notifyItemRangeChanged 是否更有效,还是我应该一个一个地更改它们,然后在每个数据视图更改后使用 notifyItemChanged?
稍微复杂一点,因为根据更改的内容,每个视图的顺序可能会发生变化,那么它是调用 notifyItemRangeInserted 的参数,针对受影响的范围调用 notifyItemRangeRemoved,还是一个一个地调用 notifyItemMoved?
哪种方式效率更高?
谢谢
RecyclerView 不会'yet'尽可能合并这些更改事件,尽管这是我们正在考虑的事情(低优先级)。
除非你正在调度数百个事件,否则应该没问题,但如果你可以调度 Range
个事件,当然对 RecyclerView 更好。
这是源代码,v7-22.1.1
/**
* Notify any registered observers that the item at <code>position</code> has changed.
*
* <p>This is an item change event, not a structural change event. It indicates that any
* reflection of the data at <code>position</code> is out of date and should be updated.
* The item at <code>position</code> retains the same identity.</p>
*
* @param position Position of the item that has changed
*
* @see #notifyItemRangeChanged(int, int)
*/
public final void notifyItemChanged(int position) {
mObservable.notifyItemRangeChanged(position, 1);
}
/**
* Notify any registered observers that the <code>itemCount</code> items starting at
* position <code>positionStart</code> have changed.
*
* <p>This is an item change event, not a structural change event. It indicates that
* any reflection of the data in the given position range is out of date and should
* be updated. The items in the given range retain the same identity.</p>
*
* @param positionStart Position of the first item that has changed
* @param itemCount Number of items that have changed
*
* @see #notifyItemChanged(int)
*/
public final void notifyItemRangeChanged(int positionStart, int itemCount) {
mObservable.notifyItemRangeChanged(positionStart, itemCount);
}
所以,notifyItemChanged(int)
是 notifyItemRangeChanged(int, int)
我有一个数据集,它可能会在刷新时发生变化。很难确定现有数据集中的哪些条目已更改。我通读了 recyclerview 适配器说明,我的主要问题是。
确定更改了哪个数据视图,然后对受影响的范围使用 notifyItemRangeChanged 是否更有效,还是我应该一个一个地更改它们,然后在每个数据视图更改后使用 notifyItemChanged?
稍微复杂一点,因为根据更改的内容,每个视图的顺序可能会发生变化,那么它是调用 notifyItemRangeInserted 的参数,针对受影响的范围调用 notifyItemRangeRemoved,还是一个一个地调用 notifyItemMoved?
哪种方式效率更高?
谢谢
RecyclerView 不会'yet'尽可能合并这些更改事件,尽管这是我们正在考虑的事情(低优先级)。
除非你正在调度数百个事件,否则应该没问题,但如果你可以调度 Range
个事件,当然对 RecyclerView 更好。
这是源代码,v7-22.1.1
/**
* Notify any registered observers that the item at <code>position</code> has changed.
*
* <p>This is an item change event, not a structural change event. It indicates that any
* reflection of the data at <code>position</code> is out of date and should be updated.
* The item at <code>position</code> retains the same identity.</p>
*
* @param position Position of the item that has changed
*
* @see #notifyItemRangeChanged(int, int)
*/
public final void notifyItemChanged(int position) {
mObservable.notifyItemRangeChanged(position, 1);
}
/**
* Notify any registered observers that the <code>itemCount</code> items starting at
* position <code>positionStart</code> have changed.
*
* <p>This is an item change event, not a structural change event. It indicates that
* any reflection of the data in the given position range is out of date and should
* be updated. The items in the given range retain the same identity.</p>
*
* @param positionStart Position of the first item that has changed
* @param itemCount Number of items that have changed
*
* @see #notifyItemChanged(int)
*/
public final void notifyItemRangeChanged(int positionStart, int itemCount) {
mObservable.notifyItemRangeChanged(positionStart, itemCount);
}
所以,notifyItemChanged(int)
是 notifyItemRangeChanged(int, int)