关闭 ScheduledExecutorService 是否安全？

Question

我正在实施一项服务，该服务执行一些更长的运行任务，由 Thread.sleep(10000) 此处模拟。当我 ctrl+c 执行时，我从来没有得到我期望的 InterruptedException 。我想知道为什么。

package simple;

import my.util.Now;
import io.dropwizard.lifecycle.Managed;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;

public class EmailSender implements Managed {

    private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(EmailSender.class);
    ScheduledExecutorService executorService = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(3);

    // Constructor
    public EmailSender() {}

    @Override
    public void start() {
        LOGGER.info("Starting email sender thread: {}", Thread.currentThread().getName());
        Runnable task = () -> {
            LOGGER.info("Running: {} in thread: {}", Now.now(), Thread.currentThread().getName());
            try {
                Thread.sleep(10000);
            } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
                LOGGER.error("Task is being interrupted: {}", ie.getMessage());
            }
        };
        executorService.scheduleAtFixedRate(task, 0, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
    }

    @Override
    public void stop() {
        LOGGER.info("Stopping email sender thread: {}", Thread.currentThread().getName());
        executorService.shutdown();

    }
}

假设 executorService.shutdown(); 以这种方式等待任务执行结束是否安全？

Answer 1

shutdown 不会终止当前运行任务，它甚至会执行队列中等待的任务。

如果您想立即终止，请使用shutdownNow。

Answer 2

Is this safe to assume that executorService.shutdown(); waits till the execution is over for the task this way?

没有。它不会等待所有线程完成。

来自 ExecutorService 的 oracle 文档页面的推荐方法：

 void shutdownAndAwaitTermination(ExecutorService pool) {
   pool.shutdown(); // Disable new tasks from being submitted
   try {
     // Wait a while for existing tasks to terminate
     if (!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) {
       pool.shutdownNow(); // Cancel currently executing tasks
       // Wait a while for tasks to respond to being cancelled
       if (!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
           System.err.println("Pool did not terminate");
     }
   } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
     // (Re-)Cancel if current thread also interrupted
     pool.shutdownNow();
     // Preserve interrupt status
     Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
   }

shutdown(): 启动有序关闭，执行之前提交的任务，但不会接受新任务。

shutdownNow():尝试停止所有正在执行的任务，停止等待任务的处理，并returns列出等待执行的任务。

你可以改变

if (!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS))

到

while (!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
Thread.sleep(60000);

关闭 ScheduledExecutorService 是否安全？

Is it safe to shut down ScheduledExecutorService?

java

multithreading

executorservice