类型缩减无限循环
Type reduction infinite loop
我的目标是从术语中删除 ()
,如下所示:
(a, b) -> (a, b)
((), b) -> b
(a, ((), b)) -> (a, b)
...
这是代码:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
module Simplify where
import Data.Type.Bool
import Data.Type.Equality
type family Simplify x where
Simplify (op () x) = Simplify x
Simplify (op x ()) = Simplify x
Simplify (op x y) = If (x == Simplify x && y == Simplify y)
(op x y)
(Simplify (op (Simplify x) (Simplify y)))
Simplify x = x
但是,尝试一下:
:kind! Simplify (String, Int)
...导致类型检查器中的无限循环。我认为 If
类型族应该处理不可约项,但我显然遗漏了一些东西。但是什么?
类型族评估不是懒惰的,因此 If c t f
将评估所有 c
、t
和 f
。 (事实上 ,类型族评估顺序现在根本没有真正定义。)所以难怪你最终会陷入无限循环 - 你总是评估 Simplify (op (Simplify x) (Simplify y))
,即使那是 Simplify (op x y)
!
您可以通过将递归和简化分开来避免这种情况,如下所示:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
module Simplify where
import Data.Type.Bool
import Data.Type.Equality
type family Simplify1 x where
Simplify1 (op () x) = x
Simplify1 (op x ()) = x
Simplify1 (op x y) = op (Simplify1 x) (Simplify1 y)
Simplify1 x = x
type family SimplifyFix x x' where
SimplifyFix x x = x
SimplifyFix x x' = SimplifyFix x' (Simplify1 x')
type Simplify x = SimplifyFix x (Simplify1 x)
想法是:
Simplify1
简化了一步。
SimplifyFix
采用 x
及其一步简化 x'
,检查它们是否相等,如果不相等则进行另一步简化(从而找到Simplify1
). 的不动点
Simplify
只是通过调用 Simplify1
. 从 SimplifyFix
链开始
由于类型族 模式匹配 是惰性的,SimplifyFix
正确地延迟了求值,防止了无限循环。
确实:
*Simplify> :kind! Simplify (String, Int)
Simplify (String, Int) :: *
= (String, Int)
*Simplify> :kind! Simplify (String, ((), (Int, ())))
Simplify (String, ((), (Int, ()))) :: *
= ([Char], Int)
我想我会提到,鉴于化简具有折叠结构,因此无需构建涉及固定点的复杂解决方案,它一次又一次地重新遍历表达式。
这样就可以了:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
module Simplify where
type family Simplify x where
Simplify (op a b) = Op op (Simplify a) (Simplify b)
Simplify x = x
type family Op op a b where
Op op () b = b
Op op a () = a
Op op a b = op a b
我的目标是从术语中删除 ()
,如下所示:
(a, b) -> (a, b)
((), b) -> b
(a, ((), b)) -> (a, b)
...
这是代码:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
module Simplify where
import Data.Type.Bool
import Data.Type.Equality
type family Simplify x where
Simplify (op () x) = Simplify x
Simplify (op x ()) = Simplify x
Simplify (op x y) = If (x == Simplify x && y == Simplify y)
(op x y)
(Simplify (op (Simplify x) (Simplify y)))
Simplify x = x
但是,尝试一下:
:kind! Simplify (String, Int)
...导致类型检查器中的无限循环。我认为 If
类型族应该处理不可约项,但我显然遗漏了一些东西。但是什么?
类型族评估不是懒惰的,因此 If c t f
将评估所有 c
、t
和 f
。 (事实上 ,类型族评估顺序现在根本没有真正定义。)所以难怪你最终会陷入无限循环 - 你总是评估 Simplify (op (Simplify x) (Simplify y))
,即使那是 Simplify (op x y)
!
您可以通过将递归和简化分开来避免这种情况,如下所示:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
module Simplify where
import Data.Type.Bool
import Data.Type.Equality
type family Simplify1 x where
Simplify1 (op () x) = x
Simplify1 (op x ()) = x
Simplify1 (op x y) = op (Simplify1 x) (Simplify1 y)
Simplify1 x = x
type family SimplifyFix x x' where
SimplifyFix x x = x
SimplifyFix x x' = SimplifyFix x' (Simplify1 x')
type Simplify x = SimplifyFix x (Simplify1 x)
想法是:
Simplify1
简化了一步。SimplifyFix
采用x
及其一步简化x'
,检查它们是否相等,如果不相等则进行另一步简化(从而找到Simplify1
). 的不动点
Simplify
只是通过调用Simplify1
. 从
SimplifyFix
链开始
由于类型族 模式匹配 是惰性的,SimplifyFix
正确地延迟了求值,防止了无限循环。
确实:
*Simplify> :kind! Simplify (String, Int)
Simplify (String, Int) :: *
= (String, Int)
*Simplify> :kind! Simplify (String, ((), (Int, ())))
Simplify (String, ((), (Int, ()))) :: *
= ([Char], Int)
我想我会提到,鉴于化简具有折叠结构,因此无需构建涉及固定点的复杂解决方案,它一次又一次地重新遍历表达式。
这样就可以了:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
module Simplify where
type family Simplify x where
Simplify (op a b) = Op op (Simplify a) (Simplify b)
Simplify x = x
type family Op op a b where
Op op () b = b
Op op a () = a
Op op a b = op a b