Functional Pearl:在 JavaScript 中实施跟踪
Functional Pearl: Implementing trace in JavaScript
Ross Paterson:Arrows and Computation introduces the trace
函数(第 11 页):
trace :: ((a, c) -> (b, c)) -> a -> b
trace f a = let (b, c) = f (a, c) in b
trace
函数对于模块化 circular programs. For example, consider Richard Bird's famous repmin
函数中的魔术反馈步骤非常有用,该函数找到树的最小叶子值 和 创建一个相同的每个叶子值都被最小叶子值替换的树,通过巧妙地使用惰性求值和局部递归(由 letrec
提供)在单次传递中完成:
data Tree = Leaf Int | Node Tree Tree deriving Show
repmin :: Tree -> Tree
repmin = trace repmin'
repmin' :: (Tree, Int) -> (Tree, Int)
-- put the minimum value m into the leaf and return the old value n as the minimum
repmin' (Leaf n, m) = (Leaf m, n)
-- copy the minimum value m into both the left and right subtrees and
-- set the minimum value m to the minimum of both the left and right subtrees
repmin' (Node l r, m) = let (l', lmin) = repmin' l m in
let (r', rmin) = repmin' r m in
(Node l' r', lmin `min` rmin)
无论如何,我想知道如何在JavaScript中实现trace
功能,这样我们就可以实现repmin
如下:
function Leaf(value) {
this.value = value;
}
function Node(left, right) {
this.left = left;
this.right = right;
}
var repmin = trace(function repmin(tree, min) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf:
return [new Leaf(min), tree.value];
case Node:
var [left, lmin] = repmin(tree.left, min);
var [right, rmin] = repmin(tree.right, min);
return [new Node(left, right), Math.min(lmin, rmin)];
}
});
为了实现trace
,我们需要letrec
提供的本地递归,这样我们就可以编写如下内容:
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, c);
return b;
};
}
本来想c
许诺的。然而,这改变了 trace
的语义。那么,你能想出一种在不改变语义的情况下在JavaScript中实现trace
的方法吗?
实际上,您只需要惰性求值,因为 JavaScript 中的赋值类似于 letrec
。惰性评估通常使用 thunks 来实现。因此,您可以按如下方式实现 trace
:
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, () => c);
return b;
};
}
使用 trace
的这个定义,repmin
函数可以保持不变:
var repmin = trace(function repmin(tree, min) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf:
return [new Leaf(min), tree.value];
case Node:
var [left, lmin] = repmin(tree.left, min);
var [right, rmin] = repmin(tree.right, min);
return [new Node(left, right), Math.min(lmin, rmin)];
}
});
但是,您可能希望使用 getter 使数据构造函数变得惰性:
function Leaf(value) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "value", descOf(value));
}
function Node(left, right) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "left", descOf(left));
Object.defineProperty(this, "right", descOf(right));
}
function descOf(value) {
var desc = { enumerable: true };
var prop = typeof value === "function" &&
value.length === 0 ? "get" : "value";
desc[prop] = value;
return desc;
}
综合起来:
var tree = new Node(new Node(new Leaf(1), new Leaf(2)),
new Node(new Leaf(3), new Leaf(4)));
console.log("Input: ", show(tree));
console.log("Output:", show(repmin(tree)));
function show(tree) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf: return "Leaf(" + tree.value + ")";
case Node: return "Node(" + show(tree.left) + ", " + show(tree.right) + ")";
}
}
<script>
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, () => c);
return b;
};
}
var repmin = trace(function repmin(tree, min) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf:
return [new Leaf(min), tree.value];
case Node:
var [left, lmin] = repmin(tree.left, min);
var [right, rmin] = repmin(tree.right, min);
return [new Node(left, right), Math.min(lmin, rmin)];
}
});
function Leaf(value) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "value", descOf(value));
}
function Node(left, right) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "left", descOf(left));
Object.defineProperty(this, "right", descOf(right));
}
function descOf(value) {
var desc = { enumerable: true };
var prop = typeof value === "function" &&
value.length === 0 ? "get" : "value";
desc[prop] = value;
return desc;
}
</script>
唯一的问题是您将无法编写如下函数:
var sqr = trace((x, y) => [y * y, x]);
这是因为 *
运算符并不懒惰。因此,您必须定义惰性 mul
函数:
var sqr = trace((x, y) => [mul(y, y), x]);
console.log(evaluate(sqr(10)));
function mul(a, b) {
return function () {
return evaluate(a) * evaluate(b);
};
}
function evaluate(value) {
return typeof value === "function" &&
value.length === 0 ? value() : value;
}
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, () => c);
return b;
};
}
希望对您有所帮助。
Ross Paterson:Arrows and Computation introduces the trace
函数(第 11 页):
trace :: ((a, c) -> (b, c)) -> a -> b
trace f a = let (b, c) = f (a, c) in b
trace
函数对于模块化 circular programs. For example, consider Richard Bird's famous repmin
函数中的魔术反馈步骤非常有用,该函数找到树的最小叶子值 和 创建一个相同的每个叶子值都被最小叶子值替换的树,通过巧妙地使用惰性求值和局部递归(由 letrec
提供)在单次传递中完成:
data Tree = Leaf Int | Node Tree Tree deriving Show
repmin :: Tree -> Tree
repmin = trace repmin'
repmin' :: (Tree, Int) -> (Tree, Int)
-- put the minimum value m into the leaf and return the old value n as the minimum
repmin' (Leaf n, m) = (Leaf m, n)
-- copy the minimum value m into both the left and right subtrees and
-- set the minimum value m to the minimum of both the left and right subtrees
repmin' (Node l r, m) = let (l', lmin) = repmin' l m in
let (r', rmin) = repmin' r m in
(Node l' r', lmin `min` rmin)
无论如何,我想知道如何在JavaScript中实现trace
功能,这样我们就可以实现repmin
如下:
function Leaf(value) {
this.value = value;
}
function Node(left, right) {
this.left = left;
this.right = right;
}
var repmin = trace(function repmin(tree, min) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf:
return [new Leaf(min), tree.value];
case Node:
var [left, lmin] = repmin(tree.left, min);
var [right, rmin] = repmin(tree.right, min);
return [new Node(left, right), Math.min(lmin, rmin)];
}
});
为了实现trace
,我们需要letrec
提供的本地递归,这样我们就可以编写如下内容:
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, c);
return b;
};
}
本来想c
许诺的。然而,这改变了 trace
的语义。那么,你能想出一种在不改变语义的情况下在JavaScript中实现trace
的方法吗?
实际上,您只需要惰性求值,因为 JavaScript 中的赋值类似于 letrec
。惰性评估通常使用 thunks 来实现。因此,您可以按如下方式实现 trace
:
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, () => c);
return b;
};
}
使用 trace
的这个定义,repmin
函数可以保持不变:
var repmin = trace(function repmin(tree, min) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf:
return [new Leaf(min), tree.value];
case Node:
var [left, lmin] = repmin(tree.left, min);
var [right, rmin] = repmin(tree.right, min);
return [new Node(left, right), Math.min(lmin, rmin)];
}
});
但是,您可能希望使用 getter 使数据构造函数变得惰性:
function Leaf(value) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "value", descOf(value));
}
function Node(left, right) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "left", descOf(left));
Object.defineProperty(this, "right", descOf(right));
}
function descOf(value) {
var desc = { enumerable: true };
var prop = typeof value === "function" &&
value.length === 0 ? "get" : "value";
desc[prop] = value;
return desc;
}
综合起来:
var tree = new Node(new Node(new Leaf(1), new Leaf(2)),
new Node(new Leaf(3), new Leaf(4)));
console.log("Input: ", show(tree));
console.log("Output:", show(repmin(tree)));
function show(tree) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf: return "Leaf(" + tree.value + ")";
case Node: return "Node(" + show(tree.left) + ", " + show(tree.right) + ")";
}
}
<script>
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, () => c);
return b;
};
}
var repmin = trace(function repmin(tree, min) {
switch (tree.constructor) {
case Leaf:
return [new Leaf(min), tree.value];
case Node:
var [left, lmin] = repmin(tree.left, min);
var [right, rmin] = repmin(tree.right, min);
return [new Node(left, right), Math.min(lmin, rmin)];
}
});
function Leaf(value) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "value", descOf(value));
}
function Node(left, right) {
Object.defineProperty(this, "left", descOf(left));
Object.defineProperty(this, "right", descOf(right));
}
function descOf(value) {
var desc = { enumerable: true };
var prop = typeof value === "function" &&
value.length === 0 ? "get" : "value";
desc[prop] = value;
return desc;
}
</script>
唯一的问题是您将无法编写如下函数:
var sqr = trace((x, y) => [y * y, x]);
这是因为 *
运算符并不懒惰。因此,您必须定义惰性 mul
函数:
var sqr = trace((x, y) => [mul(y, y), x]);
console.log(evaluate(sqr(10)));
function mul(a, b) {
return function () {
return evaluate(a) * evaluate(b);
};
}
function evaluate(value) {
return typeof value === "function" &&
value.length === 0 ? value() : value;
}
function trace(f) {
return function (a) {
var [b, c] = f(a, () => c);
return b;
};
}
希望对您有所帮助。