访问结构成员时出现段错误

Question

我遇到了一个奇怪的问题，当我尝试访问一个结构成员时我的程序出现段错误，但我的结构地址不是 NULL，而且我从未释放过这个结构。

该结构的地址类似于“0x8000000000”或“0x2000000000”。

这是 gdb 的 bt :

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000001000039cc in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x8000000000000) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:43
43      while (i < files->len)
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00000001000039cc in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x8000000000000) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:43
#1  0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x10080a400) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#2  0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x1001080d0) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#3  0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x100801800) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#4  0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x100801200) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#5  0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x100104c10) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#6  0x0000000100002137 in main (ac=1, av=0x7fff5fbff758) at srcs/main.c:26

valgrind 报告：

==29835==
==29835== HEAP SUMMARY:
==29835==     in use at exit: 415,075 bytes in 11,152 blocks
==29835==   total heap usage: 17,711 allocs, 6,559 frees, 3,960,490 bytes allocated
==29835==
==29835== 112 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 106 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000CCA1: calloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x1004ABC11: class_createInstance (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x10010F920: _os_object_alloc_realized (in /usr/lib/system/libdispatch.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x1004650D5: _xpc_pipe_create (in /usr/lib/system/libxpc.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x100467655: xpc_pipe_create (in /usr/lib/system/libxpc.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x1002AE100: _od_xpc_pipe (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x1002AE044: _od_running (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x1002ADFD8: ds_user_byuid (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x1002ADF46: search_item_bynumber (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x1002ADE82: getpwuid (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835==    by 0x1000029EB: ft_get_file_infos (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x1000027B4: ft_set_infos_foreach (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 121 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 107 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 405 bytes in 5 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 130 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 516 bytes in 20 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 133 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 2,523 bytes in 27 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 157 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 6,124 bytes in 140 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 165 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 6,493 bytes in 205 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 166 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 341,832 (104 direct, 341,728 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 178 of 178
==29835==    at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835==    by 0x100002474: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==    by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== LEAK SUMMARY:
==29835==    definitely lost: 16,398 bytes in 400 blocks
==29835==    indirectly lost: 341,728 bytes in 10,269 blocks
==29835==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==29835==    still reachable: 22,201 bytes in 62 blocks
==29835==         suppressed: 34,748 bytes in 421 blocks
==29835== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==29835== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==29835==
==29835== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==29835== ERROR SUMMARY: 1243 errors from 14 contexts (suppressed: 21 from 21)

似乎我有很多 errors/leaks，我没有释放我曾经使用过的内存（所有我的 t_files），因为它们将在程序结束时被释放。

这是我的代码：

static void     ft_swap_files(t_files *files, size_t *i)
{
    size_t  j;
    t_files tmp;

    j = *i + 1;
    while (j < files->len)
    {
        if (files[j].error < 0)
        {
            if (ft_strcmp(files[*i].name, files[j].name) > 0)
            {
                tmp = files[*i];
                files[*i] = files[j];
                files[j] = tmp;
                *i = -1;
                return ;
            }
        }
        j++;
    }
}

void            ft_sort_ascii(t_files *files)
{
    size_t  i;

    i = 0;
    while (i < files->len)
    {
        if (files[i].error < 0)
        {
            ft_swap_files(files, &i);
            if (files[i].files != NULL)
            {
                ft_sort_ascii(files[i].files);
            }
        }
        i++;
    }
}

我的t_files结构：

typedef struct      s_files
{
    size_t          len;
    t_bool          hidden;
    int             error;
    char            *path;
    char            *name;
    char            *sym_name;
    char            *rights;
    char            *uid;
    char            *gid;
    char            *time;
    int             nlink_max;
    int             size_max;

    /*
    ** from stat
    */
    int             type;
    int             nlink;
    int             size;

    t_bool          rd;
    struct s_files  *files;
}                   t_files;

多次递归调用后出现此错误。 "files[i].files" 在另一个文件中被初始化为 NULL，必要时是 malloc。

递归调用可能会导致问题？

谢谢 ;)

Answer 1

您在 ft_sort_ascii() 中有一个潜在的数组下溢访问。在 ft_swap_files() 你有代码：

      *i = -1;
      return ;
 }

其中returns到ft_sort_ascii()中的以下代码：

 ft_swap_files(files, &i);

 if (files[i].files != NULL)    // Underflow here if i == -1
 {
     ft_sort_ascii(files[i].files);  // and here if it gets this far
 }

下溢 files[] 数组。在使用它执行任何数组访问之前，您需要检查 i 是否是有效索引。

访问结构成员时出现段错误

Segfault when accessing a structure's member

c

gdb

pointers

segmentation-fault

c89