摇摆动画优化
Swing animation optimization
我一直在使用 JComponent
上的 Timer
制作一个简单的动画。但是,当我观看动画时,我会体验到难以置信的波动。我应该采取哪些步骤来优化此代码?
MyAnimationFrame
import javax.swing.*;
public class MyAnimationFrame extends JFrame {
public MyAnimationFrame() {
super("My animation frame!");
setSize(300,300);
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
add(new AnimationComponent(0,0,50,50));
setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyAnimationFrame f = new MyAnimationFrame();
}
}
AnimationComponent
import javax.swing.*;
import java.awt.*;
public class AnimationComponent extends JComponent implements ActionListener {
private Timer animTimer;
private int x;
private int y;
private int xVel;
private int yVel;
private int width;
private int height;
private int oldX;
private int oldY;
public AnimationComponent(int x, int y, int width, int height) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.height = height;
this.width = width;
animTimer = new Timer(25, this);
xVel = 5;
yVel = 5;
animTimer.start();
}
@Override
public void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
g.fillOval(x,y,width,height);
}
@Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
oldX = x;
oldY = y;
if(x + width > getParent().getWidth() || x < 0) {
xVel *= -1;
}
if(y + height > getParent().getHeight() || y < 0) {
yVel *= -1;
}
x += xVel;
y += yVel;
repaint();
}
}
不确定这是否重要,但我使用的是 OpenJDK 1.8 版。0_121。
感谢任何帮助。
Timing Framework 提供了一种提供高度优化的动画的方法,这在这种情况下可能会有所帮助。
MyAnimationFrame
import javax.swing.*;
public class MyAnimationFrame extends JFrame {
public MyAnimationFrame() {
super("My animation frame!");
setSize(300,300);
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
add(new AnimationComponent(0,0,50,50));
setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
MyAnimationFrame f = new MyAnimationFrame();
}
});
}
}
动画组件
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import org.jdesktop.core.animation.rendering.*;
import org.jdesktop.core.animation.timing.*;
import org.jdesktop.core.animation.timing.interpolators.*;
import org.jdesktop.swing.animation.rendering.*;
import org.jdesktop.swing.animation.timing.sources.*;
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
public class AnimationComponent extends JRendererPanel {
protected int x;
protected int y;
protected int width;
protected int height;
protected Animator xAnimator;
protected Animator yAnimator;
public AnimationComponent(int x, int y, int width, int height) {
setOpaque(true);
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.height = height;
this.width = width;
JRendererFactory.getDefaultRenderer(this,
new JRendererTarget<GraphicsConfiguration, Graphics2D>() {
@Override
public void renderSetup(GraphicsConfiguration gc) {
// Nothing to do
}
@Override
public void renderUpdate() {
// Nothing to do
}
@Override
public void render(Graphics2D g, int w, int h) {
Color c = g.getColor();
g.setColor(g.getBackground());
g.fillRect(0, 0, w, h);
g.setColor(c);
g.fillOval(AnimationComponent.this.x, AnimationComponent.this.y,
AnimationComponent.this.width, AnimationComponent.this.height);
}
@Override
public void renderShutdown() {
// Nothing to do
}
}, false);
this.xAnimator = new Animator.Builder(new SwingTimerTimingSource())
.addTargets(new TimingTargetAdapter() {
@Override
public void timingEvent(Animator source, double fraction) {
AnimationComponent.this.x = (int) ((getWidth() - AnimationComponent.this.width) * fraction);
}})
.setRepeatCount(Animator.INFINITE)
.setRepeatBehavior(Animator.RepeatBehavior.REVERSE)
.setInterpolator(LinearInterpolator.getInstance()).build();
this.yAnimator = new Animator.Builder(new SwingTimerTimingSource())
.addTargets(new TimingTargetAdapter() {
@Override
public void timingEvent(Animator source, double fraction) {
AnimationComponent.this.y = (int) ((getHeight() - AnimationComponent.this.height) * fraction);
}})
.setRepeatCount(Animator.INFINITE)
.setRepeatBehavior(Animator.RepeatBehavior.REVERSE)
.setInterpolator(LinearInterpolator.getInstance()).build();
addComponentListener(new ComponentAdapter() {
private int oldWidth = 0;
private int oldHeight = 0;
@Override
public void componentResized(ComponentEvent event) {
Component c = event.getComponent();
int w = c.getWidth();
int h = c.getHeight();
if (w != this.oldWidth) {
AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator.stop();
AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator = new Animator.Builder()
.copy(AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator)
.setDuration(w * 5, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) // Original speed was 200 px/s
.build();
AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator.start();
}
if (h != this.oldHeight) {
AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator.stop();
AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator = new Animator.Builder()
.copy(AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator)
.setDuration(h * 5, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) // Original speed was 200 px/s
.build();
AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator.start();
}
this.oldWidth = w;
this.oldHeight = h;
}
});
}
}
我取得了不错的效果,但有一个问题:您调整任何项目的大小,动画都会重置。
在与 Yago 进行了精彩的讨论之后,我发现这个问题围绕着许多方面,很多归结为 Java 与 OS 和硬件同步更新的能力,有些事情你可以控制,有些你不能。
受 Yago 的示例和我的 "memory" 计时框架工作原理的启发,我通过增加帧速率(到 5 毫秒,~= 200fps)和减少变化增量来测试你的代码,这给出了相同的结果结果与使用 Timing Framework 相同,但让您拥有原始设计的灵活性。
import java.awt.Graphics;
import java.awt.Graphics2D;
import java.awt.RenderingHints;
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
import java.awt.event.ActionListener;
import javax.swing.JComponent;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
import javax.swing.Timer;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Test();
}
public Test() {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
JFrame frame = new JFrame("Test");
frame.add(new AnimationComponent(0, 0, 50, 50));
frame.setSize(300, 300);
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
frame.setVisible(true);
}
});
}
public class AnimationComponent extends JComponent implements ActionListener {
private Timer animTimer;
private int x;
private int y;
private int xVel;
private int yVel;
private int width;
private int height;
private int oldX;
private int oldY;
public AnimationComponent(int x, int y, int width, int height) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.height = height;
this.width = width;
animTimer = new Timer(5, this);
xVel = 1;
yVel = 1;
animTimer.start();
}
@Override
public void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
Graphics2D g2d = (Graphics2D) g.create();
RenderingHints hints = new RenderingHints(
RenderingHints.KEY_ANTIALIASING, RenderingHints.VALUE_ANTIALIAS_ON
);
g2d.setRenderingHints(hints);
g2d.fillOval(x, y, width, height);
}
@Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
oldX = x;
oldY = y;
if (x + width > getParent().getWidth() || x < 0) {
xVel *= -1;
}
if (y + height > getParent().getHeight() || y < 0) {
yVel *= -1;
}
x += xVel;
y += yVel;
repaint();
}
}
}
如果你需要更慢的速度,然后减少变化增量,这将意味着你必须使用 double
s,这将导致 Shape
的 API 支持双精度值
你应该使用哪个?这取决于你。 Timing Framework 非常适合一段时间内的线性动画,您知道自己想要从一种状态转到另一种状态。对于像游戏这样的东西来说不太好,在游戏中,对象的状态可以从我的周期改变到另一个。我相信你可以做到,但使用简单的 "main loop" 概念会容易得多 - 恕我直言
我一直在使用 JComponent
上的 Timer
制作一个简单的动画。但是,当我观看动画时,我会体验到难以置信的波动。我应该采取哪些步骤来优化此代码?
MyAnimationFrame
import javax.swing.*;
public class MyAnimationFrame extends JFrame {
public MyAnimationFrame() {
super("My animation frame!");
setSize(300,300);
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
add(new AnimationComponent(0,0,50,50));
setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyAnimationFrame f = new MyAnimationFrame();
}
}
AnimationComponent
import javax.swing.*;
import java.awt.*;
public class AnimationComponent extends JComponent implements ActionListener {
private Timer animTimer;
private int x;
private int y;
private int xVel;
private int yVel;
private int width;
private int height;
private int oldX;
private int oldY;
public AnimationComponent(int x, int y, int width, int height) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.height = height;
this.width = width;
animTimer = new Timer(25, this);
xVel = 5;
yVel = 5;
animTimer.start();
}
@Override
public void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
g.fillOval(x,y,width,height);
}
@Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
oldX = x;
oldY = y;
if(x + width > getParent().getWidth() || x < 0) {
xVel *= -1;
}
if(y + height > getParent().getHeight() || y < 0) {
yVel *= -1;
}
x += xVel;
y += yVel;
repaint();
}
}
不确定这是否重要,但我使用的是 OpenJDK 1.8 版。0_121。
感谢任何帮助。
Timing Framework 提供了一种提供高度优化的动画的方法,这在这种情况下可能会有所帮助。
MyAnimationFrame
import javax.swing.*;
public class MyAnimationFrame extends JFrame {
public MyAnimationFrame() {
super("My animation frame!");
setSize(300,300);
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
add(new AnimationComponent(0,0,50,50));
setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
MyAnimationFrame f = new MyAnimationFrame();
}
});
}
}
动画组件
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import org.jdesktop.core.animation.rendering.*;
import org.jdesktop.core.animation.timing.*;
import org.jdesktop.core.animation.timing.interpolators.*;
import org.jdesktop.swing.animation.rendering.*;
import org.jdesktop.swing.animation.timing.sources.*;
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
public class AnimationComponent extends JRendererPanel {
protected int x;
protected int y;
protected int width;
protected int height;
protected Animator xAnimator;
protected Animator yAnimator;
public AnimationComponent(int x, int y, int width, int height) {
setOpaque(true);
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.height = height;
this.width = width;
JRendererFactory.getDefaultRenderer(this,
new JRendererTarget<GraphicsConfiguration, Graphics2D>() {
@Override
public void renderSetup(GraphicsConfiguration gc) {
// Nothing to do
}
@Override
public void renderUpdate() {
// Nothing to do
}
@Override
public void render(Graphics2D g, int w, int h) {
Color c = g.getColor();
g.setColor(g.getBackground());
g.fillRect(0, 0, w, h);
g.setColor(c);
g.fillOval(AnimationComponent.this.x, AnimationComponent.this.y,
AnimationComponent.this.width, AnimationComponent.this.height);
}
@Override
public void renderShutdown() {
// Nothing to do
}
}, false);
this.xAnimator = new Animator.Builder(new SwingTimerTimingSource())
.addTargets(new TimingTargetAdapter() {
@Override
public void timingEvent(Animator source, double fraction) {
AnimationComponent.this.x = (int) ((getWidth() - AnimationComponent.this.width) * fraction);
}})
.setRepeatCount(Animator.INFINITE)
.setRepeatBehavior(Animator.RepeatBehavior.REVERSE)
.setInterpolator(LinearInterpolator.getInstance()).build();
this.yAnimator = new Animator.Builder(new SwingTimerTimingSource())
.addTargets(new TimingTargetAdapter() {
@Override
public void timingEvent(Animator source, double fraction) {
AnimationComponent.this.y = (int) ((getHeight() - AnimationComponent.this.height) * fraction);
}})
.setRepeatCount(Animator.INFINITE)
.setRepeatBehavior(Animator.RepeatBehavior.REVERSE)
.setInterpolator(LinearInterpolator.getInstance()).build();
addComponentListener(new ComponentAdapter() {
private int oldWidth = 0;
private int oldHeight = 0;
@Override
public void componentResized(ComponentEvent event) {
Component c = event.getComponent();
int w = c.getWidth();
int h = c.getHeight();
if (w != this.oldWidth) {
AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator.stop();
AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator = new Animator.Builder()
.copy(AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator)
.setDuration(w * 5, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) // Original speed was 200 px/s
.build();
AnimationComponent.this.xAnimator.start();
}
if (h != this.oldHeight) {
AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator.stop();
AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator = new Animator.Builder()
.copy(AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator)
.setDuration(h * 5, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) // Original speed was 200 px/s
.build();
AnimationComponent.this.yAnimator.start();
}
this.oldWidth = w;
this.oldHeight = h;
}
});
}
}
我取得了不错的效果,但有一个问题:您调整任何项目的大小,动画都会重置。
在与 Yago 进行了精彩的讨论之后,我发现这个问题围绕着许多方面,很多归结为 Java 与 OS 和硬件同步更新的能力,有些事情你可以控制,有些你不能。
受 Yago 的示例和我的 "memory" 计时框架工作原理的启发,我通过增加帧速率(到 5 毫秒,~= 200fps)和减少变化增量来测试你的代码,这给出了相同的结果结果与使用 Timing Framework 相同,但让您拥有原始设计的灵活性。
import java.awt.Graphics;
import java.awt.Graphics2D;
import java.awt.RenderingHints;
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
import java.awt.event.ActionListener;
import javax.swing.JComponent;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
import javax.swing.Timer;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Test();
}
public Test() {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
JFrame frame = new JFrame("Test");
frame.add(new AnimationComponent(0, 0, 50, 50));
frame.setSize(300, 300);
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
frame.setVisible(true);
}
});
}
public class AnimationComponent extends JComponent implements ActionListener {
private Timer animTimer;
private int x;
private int y;
private int xVel;
private int yVel;
private int width;
private int height;
private int oldX;
private int oldY;
public AnimationComponent(int x, int y, int width, int height) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.height = height;
this.width = width;
animTimer = new Timer(5, this);
xVel = 1;
yVel = 1;
animTimer.start();
}
@Override
public void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
Graphics2D g2d = (Graphics2D) g.create();
RenderingHints hints = new RenderingHints(
RenderingHints.KEY_ANTIALIASING, RenderingHints.VALUE_ANTIALIAS_ON
);
g2d.setRenderingHints(hints);
g2d.fillOval(x, y, width, height);
}
@Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
oldX = x;
oldY = y;
if (x + width > getParent().getWidth() || x < 0) {
xVel *= -1;
}
if (y + height > getParent().getHeight() || y < 0) {
yVel *= -1;
}
x += xVel;
y += yVel;
repaint();
}
}
}
如果你需要更慢的速度,然后减少变化增量,这将意味着你必须使用 double
s,这将导致 Shape
的 API 支持双精度值
你应该使用哪个?这取决于你。 Timing Framework 非常适合一段时间内的线性动画,您知道自己想要从一种状态转到另一种状态。对于像游戏这样的东西来说不太好,在游戏中,对象的状态可以从我的周期改变到另一个。我相信你可以做到,但使用简单的 "main loop" 概念会容易得多 - 恕我直言