Coroutine vs Fiber 区别说明
Coroutine vs Fiber difference clarification
Linux System Programming, 2nd Edition一书中对coroutines和fiber的区别解释如下：
Coroutines and fibers provide a unit of execution even lighter in weight than the thread (with the former being their name when they are a programming language construct, and the latter when they are a system construct).
我有一些协程（语言结构）的例子，但找不到纤程的例子。
谁能给我提供一些 Fiber（系统构造）的例子？
你可以看看boost.coroutine2 and boost.fiber (C++ libraries) - both use the same context switching mechanism (callcc()/continuation) from boost.context。
简而言之 - 协程和纤程之间的区别在于，纤程之间的上下文切换由调度程序管理（选择下一个纤程...）。协程没有调度程序的概念。
中阅读有关协程和纤程之间差异的更详细解释
Linux System Programming, 2nd Edition一书中对coroutines和fiber的区别解释如下：
Coroutines and fibers provide a unit of execution even lighter in weight than the thread (with the former being their name when they are a programming language construct, and the latter when they are a system construct).
我有一些协程（语言结构）的例子，但找不到纤程的例子。
谁能给我提供一些 Fiber（系统构造）的例子？
你可以看看boost.coroutine2 and boost.fiber (C++ libraries) - both use the same context switching mechanism (callcc()/continuation) from boost.context。
简而言之 - 协程和纤程之间的区别在于，纤程之间的上下文切换由调度程序管理（选择下一个纤程...）。协程没有调度程序的概念。
中阅读有关协程和纤程之间差异的更详细解释