如何使用注释扩展让 spock 在运行时执行不同的方法?

How can I get spock to execute a different method at runtime using an Annotation Extension?

首先,如果有更简单的方法来解决这个问题,这里是我要完成的事情的概述。我想使用 KnownIssue 注释(扩展 AbstractAnnotationDrivenExtension)来注释我的测试方法,该注释将缺陷 ID 作为参数并在执行测试之前检查缺陷的状态。如果缺陷已修复,它将继续执行,如果未修复,我希望它忽略测试,但如果它已关闭或删除,我想通过日志记录说明应该删除或更新测试来引发测试失败并且注释已删除,因为缺陷现已关闭或删除。

我已经准备好一切,直到导致测试失败。我尝试过的方法不起作用:

这是我最近尝试的 visitFeatureAnnotation 方法中的内容:

def myMetaClass = feature.getFeatureMethod().getReflection().declaringClass.metaClass
myMetaClass.KnownIssueMethod = { -> return false }
feature.featureMethod.setReflection(myMetaClass.methods[0].getDoCall().getCachedMethod());

关于我如何完成此操作的任何其他想法,或者导致测试失败,或者用另一个会失败的方法替换该方法?

好的...我终于想到了解决办法。这是我的工作。在 visitFeatureAnnotation 方法中,我添加了一个我创建的 CauseFailureInterceptor。

如果有人感兴趣,这里是完整的源代码,只需要您扩展 KnownIssueExtension 并实现抽象方法 getDefectStatus:

public abstract class KnownIssueExtension extends AbstractAnnotationDrivenExtension<KnownIssue> {
    private static final org.slf4j.Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(KnownIssueExtension.class)
    public void visitFeatureAnnotation(KnownIssue knownIssue, FeatureInfo feature) {
        DefectStatus status = null
        try{
            status = getDefectStatus(knownIssue.value())
        } catch(Exception ex){
            LOGGER.warn("Unable to determine defect status for defect ID '{}', test case {}", knownIssue.value(), feature.getName())
            // If we can't get info from Defect repository, just skip it, it should not cause failures or cause us not to execute tests.
        }
        if (status != null){
            if(!status.open && !status.fixed){
                LOGGER.error("Defect with ID '{}' and title '{}' is no longer in an open status and is not fixed, for test case '{}'.  Update or remove test case.", knownIssue.value(), status.defectTitle, feature.getName())
                feature.addInterceptor(new CauseFailureInterceptor("Defect with ID '" + knownIssue.value() + "' and title '" + status.defectTitle + "' is no longer in an open status and is not fixed, for test case '" + feature.getName() + "'.  Update or remove test case."))
            }else if (status.open && !status.fixed){
                LOGGER.warn("Defect with ID '{}' and title '{}' is still open and has not been fixed.  Not executing test '{}'", knownIssue.value(), status.defectTitle, feature.getName())
                feature.setSkipped(true)
            }else if (!status.open && status.fixed){
                LOGGER.error("Defect with ID '{}' and title '{}' has been fixed and closed.  Remove KnownIssue annotation from test '{}'.", knownIssue.value(), status.defectTitle, feature.getName())
                feature.addInterceptor(new CauseFailureInterceptor("Defect with ID '" + knownIssue.value() + "' and title '" + status.defectTitle + "' has been fixed and closed.  Remove KnownIssue annotation from test '" + feature.getName() + "'."))
            }else { // status.open && status.fixed
                LOGGER.warn("Defect with ID '{}' and title '{}' has recently been fixed.  Remove KnownIssue annotation from test '{}'", knownIssue.value(), status.defectTitle, feature.getName())
            }
        }
    }

    public abstract DefectStatus getDefectStatus(String defectId)

}

public class CauseFailureInterceptor extends AbstractMethodInterceptor{
    public String failureReason
    public CauseFailureInterceptor(String failureReason = ""){
        this.failureReason = failureReason
    }

    @Override
    public void interceptFeatureExecution(IMethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
        throw new Exception(failureReason)
    }
}

class DefectStatus{
    boolean open
    boolean fixed
    String defectTitle
}