Java Thread.sleep 最短时间
Java Thread.sleep for minimum time
TimeUnit.sleep(long timeout) 文档这样描述其论点:
timeout - the minimum time to sleep.
但是,我发现 — 至少在 Windows 7 64 位和 Java 8 更新 141 上 — 线程经常休眠 less 比最小值:
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final long from = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(100);
final long to = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(1000);
final long step = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(100);
for (long requestedSleepDuration = from; requestedSleepDuration < to; requestedSleepDuration += step) {
long sleepStartTime = System.nanoTime();
TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.sleep(requestedSleepDuration);
long sleepEndTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.printf(
"requested=%9d actual=%9d %s%n",
requestedSleepDuration,
sleepEndTime - sleepStartTime,
(sleepEndTime - sleepStartTime >= requestedSleepDuration ? "OK" : " Slept less than minimum!"));
}
}
典型输出:
requested=100000000 actual= 99534864 Slept less than minimum!
requested=200000000 actual=200063646 OK
requested=300000000 actual=299223086 Slept less than minimum!
requested=400000000 actual=399598620 Slept less than minimum!
requested=500000000 actual=499910360 Slept less than minimum!
requested=600000000 actual=600028523 OK
requested=700000000 actual=699604816 Slept less than minimum!
requested=800000000 actual=799230602 Slept less than minimum!
requested=900000000 actual=899490648 Slept less than minimum!
这似乎与文档相矛盾。然而,TimeUnit 文档还指出 TimeUnit.sleep()
是 Thread.sleep
的便利包装器,而后者没有说明它是否保证至少睡眠指定的数量。
这是 API 实施错误,还是 TimeUnit.sleep
and/or Thread.sleep
设计为仅睡眠 大约 ,而不是 至少,指定的持续时间?
TimeUnit.sleep()
委托给 Thread.sleep()
.
Thread.sleep()
受制于系统计时器和调度程序的精度和准确度,因此 TimeUnit.sleep()
不会像您需要的那样准确。
TimeUnit.sleep(long timeout) 文档这样描述其论点:
timeout - the minimum time to sleep.
但是,我发现 — 至少在 Windows 7 64 位和 Java 8 更新 141 上 — 线程经常休眠 less 比最小值:
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final long from = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(100);
final long to = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(1000);
final long step = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(100);
for (long requestedSleepDuration = from; requestedSleepDuration < to; requestedSleepDuration += step) {
long sleepStartTime = System.nanoTime();
TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.sleep(requestedSleepDuration);
long sleepEndTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.printf(
"requested=%9d actual=%9d %s%n",
requestedSleepDuration,
sleepEndTime - sleepStartTime,
(sleepEndTime - sleepStartTime >= requestedSleepDuration ? "OK" : " Slept less than minimum!"));
}
}
典型输出:
requested=100000000 actual= 99534864 Slept less than minimum!
requested=200000000 actual=200063646 OK
requested=300000000 actual=299223086 Slept less than minimum!
requested=400000000 actual=399598620 Slept less than minimum!
requested=500000000 actual=499910360 Slept less than minimum!
requested=600000000 actual=600028523 OK
requested=700000000 actual=699604816 Slept less than minimum!
requested=800000000 actual=799230602 Slept less than minimum!
requested=900000000 actual=899490648 Slept less than minimum!
这似乎与文档相矛盾。然而,TimeUnit 文档还指出 TimeUnit.sleep()
是 Thread.sleep
的便利包装器,而后者没有说明它是否保证至少睡眠指定的数量。
这是 API 实施错误,还是 TimeUnit.sleep
and/or Thread.sleep
设计为仅睡眠 大约 ,而不是 至少,指定的持续时间?
TimeUnit.sleep()
委托给 Thread.sleep()
.
Thread.sleep()
受制于系统计时器和调度程序的精度和准确度,因此 TimeUnit.sleep()
不会像您需要的那样准确。