按类型索引 vs 在 idris 中包含类型
indexed by a type vs containing a type in idris
我目前正在阅读 Type-Driven Development with Idris 这本书。
我有两个问题与第 6 章中示例数据存储的设计有关。数据存储是一个命令行应用程序,允许用户设置其中存储的数据类型,然后添加新数据.
下面是代码的相关部分(略有简化)。您可以在 Github:
上看到 full code
module Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
-- This datatype is to define what sorts of data can be contained in the data store.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
-- This is a type-level function that translates a Schema to an actual type.
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
-- This is the data store. It can potentially be storing any sort of schema.
record DataStore where
constructor MkData
schema : Schema
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
-- This adds new data to the datastore, making sure that the new data is
-- the same type that the DataStore holds.
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore (MkData schema' size' store') newitem =
MkData schema' _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema') -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema')
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
-- These are commands the user can use on the command line. They are able
-- to change the schema, and add new data.
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
-- Given a Schema, this parses input from the user into a Command.
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
-- This is the main workhorse of the application. It parses user
-- input, turns it into a command, then evaluates the command and
-- returns an updated DataStore.
processInput
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> String -> Maybe (String, DataStore)
processInput dataStore@(MkData schema' size' items') input =
case parse schema' input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", dataStore)
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", MkData newSchema _ [])
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData schema' size' items') item
in Just ("ID " ++ show (size dataStore) ++ "\n", newStore)
-- This kicks off processInput with an empty datastore and a simple Schema
-- of SString.
main : IO ()
main = replWith (MkData SString _ []) "Command: " processInput
这很有意义并且易于使用,但有一件事让我对设计感到困扰。 为什么 DataStore
包含一个 Schema
而不是被一个 索引?
因为 DataStore
没有被 Schema
索引,我们可能会像这样编写一个不正确的 addToStore
函数:
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore _ newitem =
MkData SInt _ []
这是我想象的更多类型安全代码的样子。您可以在 Github 上看到 full code:
module Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
record DataStore (schema : Schema) where
constructor MkData
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore schema) ->
SchemaType schema ->
DataStore schema
addToStore {schema} (MkData size' store') newitem =
MkData _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema) -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema)
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
processInput
: (schema : Schema ** DataStore schema) ->
String ->
Maybe (String, (newschema ** DataStore newschema))
processInput (schema ** (MkData size' items')) input =
case parse schema input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", (_ ** MkData size' items'))
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", (newSchema ** MkData _ []))
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData size' items') item
msg = "ID " ++ show (size newStore) ++ "\n"
in Just (msg, (schema ** newStore))
main : IO ()
main = replWith (SString ** MkData _ []) "Command: " processInput
这是我的两个问题:
为什么这本书没有使用更安全的 DataStore
类型版本(由 Schema
索引的版本)?使用类型安全性较低的版本(仅包含 Schema
的版本)有什么好处吗?
一种类型被另一种类型索引与包含另一种类型在理论上有什么区别?这种差异是否会根据您使用的语言而改变?
例如,我认为在 Idris 中可能没有太大差异,但在 Haskell 中却有很大差异。 (对...?)
我刚开始玩 Idris(我不是特别精通 Haskell 中单例或 GADT 的使用),所以我很难理解这个问题。如果你能给我指出任何关于这个的论文,我会非常感兴趣。
根据评论,这是卖弄学问。早期,使用依赖记录,因此不需要处理类型索引。后来,使用索引类型来限制(并通过证明搜索更容易找到)有效实现。
我目前正在阅读 Type-Driven Development with Idris 这本书。
我有两个问题与第 6 章中示例数据存储的设计有关。数据存储是一个命令行应用程序,允许用户设置其中存储的数据类型,然后添加新数据.
下面是代码的相关部分(略有简化)。您可以在 Github:
上看到 full codemodule Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
-- This datatype is to define what sorts of data can be contained in the data store.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
-- This is a type-level function that translates a Schema to an actual type.
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
-- This is the data store. It can potentially be storing any sort of schema.
record DataStore where
constructor MkData
schema : Schema
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
-- This adds new data to the datastore, making sure that the new data is
-- the same type that the DataStore holds.
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore (MkData schema' size' store') newitem =
MkData schema' _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema') -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema')
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
-- These are commands the user can use on the command line. They are able
-- to change the schema, and add new data.
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
-- Given a Schema, this parses input from the user into a Command.
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
-- This is the main workhorse of the application. It parses user
-- input, turns it into a command, then evaluates the command and
-- returns an updated DataStore.
processInput
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> String -> Maybe (String, DataStore)
processInput dataStore@(MkData schema' size' items') input =
case parse schema' input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", dataStore)
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", MkData newSchema _ [])
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData schema' size' items') item
in Just ("ID " ++ show (size dataStore) ++ "\n", newStore)
-- This kicks off processInput with an empty datastore and a simple Schema
-- of SString.
main : IO ()
main = replWith (MkData SString _ []) "Command: " processInput
这很有意义并且易于使用,但有一件事让我对设计感到困扰。 为什么 DataStore
包含一个 Schema
而不是被一个 索引?
因为 DataStore
没有被 Schema
索引,我们可能会像这样编写一个不正确的 addToStore
函数:
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore _ newitem =
MkData SInt _ []
这是我想象的更多类型安全代码的样子。您可以在 Github 上看到 full code:
module Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
record DataStore (schema : Schema) where
constructor MkData
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore schema) ->
SchemaType schema ->
DataStore schema
addToStore {schema} (MkData size' store') newitem =
MkData _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema) -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema)
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
processInput
: (schema : Schema ** DataStore schema) ->
String ->
Maybe (String, (newschema ** DataStore newschema))
processInput (schema ** (MkData size' items')) input =
case parse schema input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", (_ ** MkData size' items'))
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", (newSchema ** MkData _ []))
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData size' items') item
msg = "ID " ++ show (size newStore) ++ "\n"
in Just (msg, (schema ** newStore))
main : IO ()
main = replWith (SString ** MkData _ []) "Command: " processInput
这是我的两个问题:
为什么这本书没有使用更安全的
DataStore
类型版本(由Schema
索引的版本)?使用类型安全性较低的版本(仅包含Schema
的版本)有什么好处吗?一种类型被另一种类型索引与包含另一种类型在理论上有什么区别?这种差异是否会根据您使用的语言而改变?
例如,我认为在 Idris 中可能没有太大差异,但在 Haskell 中却有很大差异。 (对...?)
我刚开始玩 Idris(我不是特别精通 Haskell 中单例或 GADT 的使用),所以我很难理解这个问题。如果你能给我指出任何关于这个的论文,我会非常感兴趣。
根据评论,这是卖弄学问。早期,使用依赖记录,因此不需要处理类型索引。后来,使用索引类型来限制(并通过证明搜索更容易找到)有效实现。