空手道 BDD 框架通过简单的配置抛出 NPE
Karate BDD framework throwing NPE with simple configuration
我正在尝试使用 Karate BDD 框架在我的 API 套件上进行 运行 测试,但我 运行 进入了 NPE。据我所知,我没有配置错误任何东西,但我确信我忽略了一些东西。鉴于以下功能文件和任务运行器,我是否做错了什么?
更新: 这适用于空手道 0.2.9,但不适用于当前最新的 0.5.0.2
特征文件:.../src/test/resources/root/feature/sanity.特征
Feature: Sanity Check
As a developer
I want to ensure that the test framework is active
So that I can be confident I am testing correctly
Background:
* url httpBin
Scenario: httpBin reflection
Given path '/anything/foo/bar?baz=quux'
When method GET
Then status 200
And match response contains { "args": {"baz":"quux"}}
And match response contains { "method": "GET" }
Driver: .../src/test/java/root/feature/sanity/SmokeTest.java
package root.feature.sanity;
import com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate;
import cucumber.api.CucumberOptions;
import org.junit.AfterClass;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
/**
* Created by williamspaul on 8/29/17.
*/
@RunWith(Karate.class)
@CucumberOptions(plugin = {"pretty", "html:target/cucumber"})
public class SmokeTest {
@BeforeClass
public static void beforeClass() {}
@AfterClass
public static void afterClass() {}
}
mvn 测试输出
-------------------------------------------------------
T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running root.feature.sanity.SmokeTest
10:46:08.568 [main] DEBUG com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberRunner - init test class: class apigee.feature.sanity.SmokeTest
10:46:08.680 [main] DEBUG com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberRunner - loading feature: /(private-path)/target/test-classes/root/feature/sanity/sanity.feature
Feature: Sanity Check
As a developer
I want to ensure that the test framework is active
So that I can be confident I am testing correctly
Background: # apigee/feature/sanity/sanity.feature:6
* url httpBin
0 Scenarios
0 Steps
0m0.000s
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.389 sec <<< FAILURE!
Feature: Sanity Check Time elapsed: 0.11 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberUtils.afterStep(CucumberUtils.java:148)
at com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberUtils.runStep(CucumberUtils.java:140)
at com.intuit.karate.cucumber.KarateRuntime.runStep(KarateRuntime.java:51)
at cucumber.runtime.model.StepContainer.runStep(StepContainer.java:44)
at cucumber.runtime.model.StepContainer.runSteps(StepContainer.java:39)
at cucumber.runtime.model.CucumberScenario.runBackground(CucumberScenario.java:59)
at cucumber.runtime.model.CucumberScenario.run(CucumberScenario.java:42)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.ExecutionUnitRunner.run(ExecutionUnitRunner.java:102)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.FeatureRunner.runChild(FeatureRunner.java:63)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.FeatureRunner.runChild(FeatureRunner.java:18)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access[=12=]0(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.FeatureRunner.run(FeatureRunner.java:70)
at com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate.runChild(Karate.java:60)
at com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate.runChild(Karate.java:25)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access[=12=]0(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate.run(Karate.java:66)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
Results :
Tests in error:
Feature: Sanity Check
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
您实际上使用的是测试版。用0.5.0就可以了
顺便说一句,非常感谢您找到这个,它已在开发分支中修复:https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/158
另请查看 this tweet 以了解为什么需要此前/后步骤挂钩的详细信息
我正在尝试使用 Karate BDD 框架在我的 API 套件上进行 运行 测试,但我 运行 进入了 NPE。据我所知,我没有配置错误任何东西,但我确信我忽略了一些东西。鉴于以下功能文件和任务运行器,我是否做错了什么?
更新: 这适用于空手道 0.2.9,但不适用于当前最新的 0.5.0.2
特征文件:.../src/test/resources/root/feature/sanity.特征
Feature: Sanity Check
As a developer
I want to ensure that the test framework is active
So that I can be confident I am testing correctly
Background:
* url httpBin
Scenario: httpBin reflection
Given path '/anything/foo/bar?baz=quux'
When method GET
Then status 200
And match response contains { "args": {"baz":"quux"}}
And match response contains { "method": "GET" }
Driver: .../src/test/java/root/feature/sanity/SmokeTest.java
package root.feature.sanity;
import com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate;
import cucumber.api.CucumberOptions;
import org.junit.AfterClass;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
/**
* Created by williamspaul on 8/29/17.
*/
@RunWith(Karate.class)
@CucumberOptions(plugin = {"pretty", "html:target/cucumber"})
public class SmokeTest {
@BeforeClass
public static void beforeClass() {}
@AfterClass
public static void afterClass() {}
}
mvn 测试输出
-------------------------------------------------------
T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running root.feature.sanity.SmokeTest
10:46:08.568 [main] DEBUG com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberRunner - init test class: class apigee.feature.sanity.SmokeTest
10:46:08.680 [main] DEBUG com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberRunner - loading feature: /(private-path)/target/test-classes/root/feature/sanity/sanity.feature
Feature: Sanity Check
As a developer
I want to ensure that the test framework is active
So that I can be confident I am testing correctly
Background: # apigee/feature/sanity/sanity.feature:6
* url httpBin
0 Scenarios
0 Steps
0m0.000s
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.389 sec <<< FAILURE!
Feature: Sanity Check Time elapsed: 0.11 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberUtils.afterStep(CucumberUtils.java:148)
at com.intuit.karate.cucumber.CucumberUtils.runStep(CucumberUtils.java:140)
at com.intuit.karate.cucumber.KarateRuntime.runStep(KarateRuntime.java:51)
at cucumber.runtime.model.StepContainer.runStep(StepContainer.java:44)
at cucumber.runtime.model.StepContainer.runSteps(StepContainer.java:39)
at cucumber.runtime.model.CucumberScenario.runBackground(CucumberScenario.java:59)
at cucumber.runtime.model.CucumberScenario.run(CucumberScenario.java:42)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.ExecutionUnitRunner.run(ExecutionUnitRunner.java:102)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.FeatureRunner.runChild(FeatureRunner.java:63)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.FeatureRunner.runChild(FeatureRunner.java:18)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access[=12=]0(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at cucumber.runtime.junit.FeatureRunner.run(FeatureRunner.java:70)
at com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate.runChild(Karate.java:60)
at com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate.runChild(Karate.java:25)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access[=12=]0(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at com.intuit.karate.junit4.Karate.run(Karate.java:66)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
Results :
Tests in error:
Feature: Sanity Check
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
您实际上使用的是测试版。用0.5.0就可以了
顺便说一句,非常感谢您找到这个,它已在开发分支中修复:https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/158
另请查看 this tweet 以了解为什么需要此前/后步骤挂钩的详细信息