自定义多线程:限制某种类型的任务并行执行的数量,不限制其他类型的任务

Customized multithreading: limiting number of tasks of some type to be executed in parallel, without limiting tasks of other types

我有 3 种类型的任务:A, B, C

而且我想 运行 在 N 个线程中并行执行这些任务。假设任务列表如下:

A, B, C, B, C, A, B, C

当然,我可以使用ExecutorService实现多线程执行,但问题是我一次最多需要执行一个C类型的任务。 类型 C 的其他任务必须按顺序执行,但与任务 A and/or B.

并行执行

例如3线程执行器可能处于以下任何状态:

A B C
A A A
A C B
B B C
B B B
B C
A C 
A B 
C  
... 

(允许同时执行多个A类或B类任务,但最多只能同时执行一个C类任务)

在Java中有什么方法可以做到这一点吗?

更新

这是我想出的方法这是正确的方法吗 在这里,我通过 ExecutorService 执行所有任务,在执行时我会检查是否有任何其他 C 任务是 Running.If 不是我会执行,否则我会将它添加到队列中,该队列将在任何其他任务的成功完成并且我还检查任何 C 任务是 运行ning 或 Not

public class Test {

public void startExecution() {
    Queue<String> runQ = new LinkedList<>();
    ThreadPool exec = (ThreadPool) Executors.newFixedThreadPool(RunSettings.getRunSettings().getThreadCount());
    while (!runQ.isEmpty() && !SystemDefaults.stopExecution.get()) {
        String TaskName = runQ.remove();
        Task t = new Task(TaskName);
        exec.execute(t, TaskName);

    }
    exec.shutdown();
    if (exec.awaitTermination(RunSettings.getRunSettings().getExecutionTimeOut(), TimeUnit.MINUTES)) {
        System.out.println("[CONTROL: ALL TEST TASKS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.]");
    } else {
        System.out.println("[CONTROL: ALL THE TEST TASKS DID NOT COMPLETE SUCCESSFULLY IN STIPULATED TIME. FORCEFULLY FINALIZING.]");
        exec.shutdownNow();

    }
}
}

我创建的ThreadPool

public class ThreadPool extends ThreadPoolExecutor {

public ThreadPool(int corePoolSize, int maximumPoolSize, long keepAliveTime, TimeUnit unit, BlockingQueue<Runnable> workQueue) {
    super(corePoolSize, maximumPoolSize, keepAliveTime, unit, workQueue);
}

final String CTask = "TaskC";
Map<Runnable, String> TaskPool = new HashMap<>();
Queue<Runnable> TaskCList = new LinkedList<>();

@Override
protected void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) {
    super.afterExecute(r, t);
    if (TaskPool.containsKey(r)) {
        TaskPool.remove(r);
    }
    if (!TaskPool.containsValue(CTask) && !TaskCList.isEmpty()) {
        Runnable ieRun = TaskCList.remove();
        super.execute(ieRun);
        TaskPool.put(ieRun, CTask);
    }
}

public void execute(Runnable command, String TaskType) {
    if (TaskPool.containsValue(TaskType)
            && TaskType.equalsIgnoreCase(CTask)) {
        System.out.println("Another Instance of  " + CTask + " Running");
        TaskCList.add(command);
    } else {
        super.execute(command);
        TaskPool.put(command, TaskType);
    }
}

}

最简单的方法是创建 2 个执行器:一个单线程用于 C 类型的任务,另一个多线程用于其他类型的任务:

class ExecutorWrapper {
    private ExecutorService forC = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
    private ExecutorService forAnother = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(THREAD_NUMBER);

    public void acceptTask(Runnable r) {
        if (r instanceof TaskC) {
            forC.execute(r);
        } else {
            forAnother.execute(r);
        }
    }
}

现在,任何类型 C 的任务都将在 forC 执行器内部队列中等待,直到另一个此类任务完成。

如果您不希望创建另一个执行程序,则需要实施某种并发控制,这要复杂得多,并且由于可能会出现竞争条件而难以调试。我可以提出解决方案草案,但没有代码:

  1. 创建一个标志以指示另一个任务 C 是否已在执行,以及另一个任务 C 将等待的队列
  2. 当类型C的任务到达时,检查是否有另一个任务C正在执行,如果是,则将其加入上述队列
  3. 在任务 C 完成时,发送某种任务 C 已完成的通知——以便从提到的队列中取出下一个任务 C 并将其发送到执行器。如果队列为空,则清除标志以指示现在没有任务 C 正在执行。这种通知可以通过用 Callable 包装任务 C 并调用 Future#get 方法来实现,该方法将阻塞直到任务完成。

看起来你需要做的就是制作任务 C synchronized。这里有一些测试代码似乎证明这就足够了——尽管没有失败并不总是意味着成功。

结果清楚地显示了 A 和 B 的 运行 是平行的,但 C 没有。

static enum Task implements Callable<Void> {

    A,
    B,
    C {
                @Override
                public synchronized Void call() throws Exception {
                    if (running.get(this).get() != 0) {
                        System.out.println("FAIL!");
                    }
                    return super.call();
                }

            };

    // How many of each are running.
    static Map<Task, AtomicInteger> running = Stream.of(Task.values())
            .collect(
                    Collectors.toMap(
                            (t) -> t,
                            (t) -> new AtomicInteger(0),
                            (x, y) -> x,
                            () -> new EnumMap<Task, AtomicInteger>(Task.class)));

    // List all running tasks.
    private String runningList() {
        StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder();
        running.entrySet().stream().forEach((r) -> {
            if (r.getValue().get() != 0) {
                s.append(r.getKey()).append("=").append(r.getValue()).append(",");
            }
        });
        return s.toString();
    }

    static final Random random = new Random();

    @Override
    public Void call() throws Exception {
        System.out.println("Running " + name() + " with " + runningList());
        // Mark me running.
        running.get(this).getAndIncrement();
        // Hang around for a bit.
        Thread.sleep(random.nextInt(1000));
        // Mark me not running.
        running.get(this).getAndDecrement();
        return null;
    }

}

// The pool.
static ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);
// The tasks.
static Task[] tasks = new Task[]{Task.A, Task.B, Task.C, Task.B, Task.C, Task.A, Task.B, Task.C,};

public void test() throws InterruptedException {
    // Run 10 times.
    for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
        pool.invokeAll(Arrays.asList(tasks));
    }
    pool.shutdown();
    pool.awaitTermination(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
}

感谢大家 support.Anyhow 我想出了一个目前运行良好的解决方案

public class Test {

public void startExecution() {
Queue<String> runQ = new LinkedList<>();
ThreadPool threadPool = new ThreadPool(threadCount,timeOut);
while (!runQ.isEmpty()) {
    String TaskName = runQ.remove();
    Task t = new Task(TaskName);
    threadPool.execute(t, TaskName);

}
if (threadPool.awaitTermination(timeOut, TimeUnit.MINUTES)) {
    System.out.println("[CONTROL: ALL TEST TASKS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.]");
} else {
    System.out.println("[CONTROL: ALL THE TEST TASKS DID NOT COMPLETE SUCCESSFULLY IN STIPULATED TIME. FORCEFULLY FINALIZING.]");
    threadPool.shutdownNow();

}
}
}

线程池实现

 public class ThreadPool extends ThreadPoolExecutor {

public ThreadPool(int threadCount, long keepAliveTime) {
    super(threadCount, threadCount, keepAliveTime, TimeUnit.MINUTES, new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>());
}

final String CTask = "TaskC";
Map<Runnable, String> TaskPool = new HashMap<>();
Queue<Runnable> TaskCList = new LinkedList<>();

@Override
protected synchronized void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) {
    super.afterExecute(r, t);
    System.out.println(TaskPool.get(r) + "Finished");
    if (TaskPool.containsKey(r)) {
        TaskPool.remove(r);
    }
    if (TaskCList.isEmpty()) {
        super.shutdown();
    }
    if (!TaskPool.containsValue(CTask) && !TaskCList.isEmpty()) {
        if (super.getActiveCount() < super.getCorePoolSize()) {
            System.out.println("Trying to execute Other C Tasks");
            Runnable ieRun = TaskCList.remove();
            super.execute(ieRun);
            TaskPool.put(ieRun, CTask);
        }
    }
}

public synchronized void execute(Runnable command, String TaskType) {
    if (TaskPool.containsValue(TaskType)
            && TaskType.equalsIgnoreCase(CTask)) {
        System.out.println("Another Instance of TaskC Running");
        System.out.println("Added for future Execution");
        TaskCList.add(command);
    } else {
        System.out.println("Adding " + TaskType + " to execution");
        TaskPool.put(command, TaskType);
        super.execute(command);
    }
}