HasMany Object 或 Eloquent:哪个更好?
HasMany Object or Eloquent: Which is better?
我有以下用于 blog
的控制器
public function show($slug)
{
$post = Blog::where('slugs', '=', $slug)->first();
$vars['pageTitle'] = Config::get('site.pageTitle') . $post['title'];
// The breadcrumbs... needs to be repopulated every page
$vars['breadCrumbs'] = [[
'url' => action('SimpleController@index'),
'title' => 'CovertDEV'
],[
'url' => action('BlogController@index'),
'title' => 'Blog'
],[
'url' => route('blog_post', ['slug' => $slug]),
'title' => $post['title']
]];
$vars['blog'] = $post;
// The following line is what the question is about
$vars['comments'] = $post->Blog_comments->groupBy('comment_id');
return view('blog', $vars);
}
我的博客模型原来是这样的
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
class Blog extends Model
{
//
public function tags()
{
return $this->belongsToMany('App\Tag');
}
public function blog_comments()
{
return $this->hasMany('App\Blog_comment');
}
public function users()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\User', 'user_id');
}
}
和 blog_comments
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
class Blog_comment extends Model
{
//
public function users()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\User', 'user_id');
}
public function blogs()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\Blog');
}
}
我正在检索 post 的评论并将其显示在页面上。一切正常...但后来我尝试使用我的关系...(将那行更改为...)
$vars['comments'] = $post->blog_comments()->get()->groupBy('comment_id');
这同样有效。我的 post 并不大,只有一个简单的 'Lorem Ipsum' 测试文本和 7 条评论来测试该功能,所以我看不出这两种方法在加载时间上有任何差异。
或者它们都是一样的?以前的方式看起来更好,但我不确定我是否按预期实现了 ORM,如果不是,那么哪种方式更好?
但我是 Laravel 的新手(这是我的第一个框架)所以我不知道...哪种方法 better/faster/more 有效?也许有一种甚至 better/more 有效的方法来完成这个我还不知道。
抱歉,如果这看起来很明显。我想在继续项目之前解决这个问题...不想在找到更好的方法将信息联系在一起后重做所有事情。
提前致谢!
我的数据库转储是
CREATE TABLE `blog_comments` (
`id` int(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`user_id` int(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`blog_id` int(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`comment_id` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`comment` text COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
`likes` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`deleted_at` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
`created_at` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
`updated_at` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_unicode_ci;
--
-- Dumping data for table `blog_comments`
--
INSERT INTO `blog_comments` (`id`, `user_id`, `blog_id`, `comment_id`, `comment`, `likes`, `deleted_at`, `created_at`, `updated_at`) VALUES
(1, 1, 2, 0, 'Interesting post. Very well structured and good points throughout! One question though, Enim blandit volutpat maecenas volutpat blandit aliquam etiam erat velit?', 0, NULL, '2018-02-24 20:31:45', '2018-02-24 20:31:45'),
(2, 2, 2, 1, 'Thank you, very interesting question. Unique point of view. Semper viverra nam libero justo. Sit amet commodo nulla facilisi. Blandit massa enim nec dui nunc. Eget velit aliquet sagittis id consectetur purus ut faucibus.', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 02:26:32', '2018-02-25 02:26:32'),
(3, 1, 2, 1, 'Indeed! I can now finally lorem ipsum by myself all the way commodo nulla facilisi!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 04:36:18', '2018-02-25 04:36:18'),
(4, 2, 2, 0, 'Weird, I thought I had more information posted. Must have being moderated out of existence then.', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 09:18:58', '2018-02-25 09:18:58'),
(5, 1, 2, 4, 'Sorry about that, you had quite a few needless stuff in there. Had to tweak your post a bit. Otherwise, everything is lorem ipsum!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 12:53:18', '2018-02-25 12:53:18'),
(6, 2, 2, 3, 'Glad that it works for you!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-26 05:35:46', '2018-02-26 05:35:46'),
(7, 1, 2, 6, 'Thank you, feels good!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 07:08:33', '2018-02-25 07:08:33');
--
-- Indexes for dumped tables
--
--
-- Indexes for table `blog_comments`
--
ALTER TABLE `blog_comments`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
ADD KEY `blog_comments_user_id_index` (`user_id`),
ADD KEY `blog_comments_blog_id_index` (`blog_id`);
我需要结果数组如下所示:
Array
(
[comment_id] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 1
[user_id] => 1
[blog_id] => 2
[comment_id] => 0
[comment] => Interesting post. Very well structured and good points throughout! One question though, Enim blandit volutpat maecenas volutpat blandit aliquam etiam erat velit?
[likes] => 0
[deleted_at] =>
[created_at] => 2018-02-24 14:31:45
[updated_at] => 2018-02-24 14:31:45
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 4
[user_id] => 2
[blog_id] => 2
[comment_id] => 0
[comment] => Weird, I thought I had more information posted. Must have being moderated out of existence then.
[likes] => 0
[deleted_at] =>
[created_at] => 2018-02-25 03:18:58
[updated_at] => 2018-02-25 03:18:58
)
)
)
comment_id
和parent_id
是一样的。。。我原来叫它comment_id
现在不想改了。
任何 comment_id 为 0 的评论都是父评论,任何 comment_if 为任何数字的评论都是该评论的子评论。
可能造成了一些混乱。抱歉。
我只想知道生成这种数组的最有效方法是什么。我已经使用了 3 或 4 种方法,现在我想知道我是否遗漏了什么。
我认为这是一个不太干净但我相信比依赖 Collection 的 groupBy
更有效的解决方案
$post = Blog::with(['blog_comments' => function($query) {
$query->groupBy('comment_id');
}])->where('slugs', $slug)->first();
$vars['comments'] = $post->blog_comments;
尽管如果您不希望有数千条评论,那么您当前的实现是可以的。
使用它更有效,因为您将 groupBy
工作负载交给数据库管理器而不是 php 本身(当使用 集合的groupBy
).
您还可以声明另一个适合您分组需要的关系。
// Blog.php
public function groupedBlogComments()
{
return $this->hasMany(BlogComment::class)
->groupBy('comment_id');
// I think this can be `return $this->blogComments()
// ->groupBy('comment_id');
}
// you can still have this, if ever you do not want grouped comments
public function blogComments()
{
return $this->hasMany(BlogComment::class);
}
// Controller
$vars['comments'] = $post->groupedBlogComments;
或者更好的是,在您的 BlogComment
模型中定义一个范围,然后在任何地方使用它。
// BlogComment.php
public function scopeGroupByCommentId($query)
{
return $query->groupBy('comment_id');
}
// You can eager load your relationships and use the scope.
$post = Blog::with(['blog_comments' => function($query) {
$query->groupByCommentId();
}])->where('slugs', $slug)->first();
$vars['comments'] = $post->blog_comments;
如有错误,欢迎指正。
希望我明白你的意思。
我有以下用于 blog
public function show($slug)
{
$post = Blog::where('slugs', '=', $slug)->first();
$vars['pageTitle'] = Config::get('site.pageTitle') . $post['title'];
// The breadcrumbs... needs to be repopulated every page
$vars['breadCrumbs'] = [[
'url' => action('SimpleController@index'),
'title' => 'CovertDEV'
],[
'url' => action('BlogController@index'),
'title' => 'Blog'
],[
'url' => route('blog_post', ['slug' => $slug]),
'title' => $post['title']
]];
$vars['blog'] = $post;
// The following line is what the question is about
$vars['comments'] = $post->Blog_comments->groupBy('comment_id');
return view('blog', $vars);
}
我的博客模型原来是这样的
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
class Blog extends Model
{
//
public function tags()
{
return $this->belongsToMany('App\Tag');
}
public function blog_comments()
{
return $this->hasMany('App\Blog_comment');
}
public function users()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\User', 'user_id');
}
}
和 blog_comments
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
class Blog_comment extends Model
{
//
public function users()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\User', 'user_id');
}
public function blogs()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\Blog');
}
}
我正在检索 post 的评论并将其显示在页面上。一切正常...但后来我尝试使用我的关系...(将那行更改为...)
$vars['comments'] = $post->blog_comments()->get()->groupBy('comment_id');
这同样有效。我的 post 并不大,只有一个简单的 'Lorem Ipsum' 测试文本和 7 条评论来测试该功能,所以我看不出这两种方法在加载时间上有任何差异。
或者它们都是一样的?以前的方式看起来更好,但我不确定我是否按预期实现了 ORM,如果不是,那么哪种方式更好?
但我是 Laravel 的新手(这是我的第一个框架)所以我不知道...哪种方法 better/faster/more 有效?也许有一种甚至 better/more 有效的方法来完成这个我还不知道。
抱歉,如果这看起来很明显。我想在继续项目之前解决这个问题...不想在找到更好的方法将信息联系在一起后重做所有事情。
提前致谢!
我的数据库转储是
CREATE TABLE `blog_comments` (
`id` int(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`user_id` int(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`blog_id` int(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`comment_id` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`comment` text COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
`likes` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`deleted_at` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
`created_at` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL,
`updated_at` timestamp NULL DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_unicode_ci;
--
-- Dumping data for table `blog_comments`
--
INSERT INTO `blog_comments` (`id`, `user_id`, `blog_id`, `comment_id`, `comment`, `likes`, `deleted_at`, `created_at`, `updated_at`) VALUES
(1, 1, 2, 0, 'Interesting post. Very well structured and good points throughout! One question though, Enim blandit volutpat maecenas volutpat blandit aliquam etiam erat velit?', 0, NULL, '2018-02-24 20:31:45', '2018-02-24 20:31:45'),
(2, 2, 2, 1, 'Thank you, very interesting question. Unique point of view. Semper viverra nam libero justo. Sit amet commodo nulla facilisi. Blandit massa enim nec dui nunc. Eget velit aliquet sagittis id consectetur purus ut faucibus.', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 02:26:32', '2018-02-25 02:26:32'),
(3, 1, 2, 1, 'Indeed! I can now finally lorem ipsum by myself all the way commodo nulla facilisi!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 04:36:18', '2018-02-25 04:36:18'),
(4, 2, 2, 0, 'Weird, I thought I had more information posted. Must have being moderated out of existence then.', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 09:18:58', '2018-02-25 09:18:58'),
(5, 1, 2, 4, 'Sorry about that, you had quite a few needless stuff in there. Had to tweak your post a bit. Otherwise, everything is lorem ipsum!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 12:53:18', '2018-02-25 12:53:18'),
(6, 2, 2, 3, 'Glad that it works for you!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-26 05:35:46', '2018-02-26 05:35:46'),
(7, 1, 2, 6, 'Thank you, feels good!', 0, NULL, '2018-02-25 07:08:33', '2018-02-25 07:08:33');
--
-- Indexes for dumped tables
--
--
-- Indexes for table `blog_comments`
--
ALTER TABLE `blog_comments`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
ADD KEY `blog_comments_user_id_index` (`user_id`),
ADD KEY `blog_comments_blog_id_index` (`blog_id`);
我需要结果数组如下所示:
Array
(
[comment_id] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 1
[user_id] => 1
[blog_id] => 2
[comment_id] => 0
[comment] => Interesting post. Very well structured and good points throughout! One question though, Enim blandit volutpat maecenas volutpat blandit aliquam etiam erat velit?
[likes] => 0
[deleted_at] =>
[created_at] => 2018-02-24 14:31:45
[updated_at] => 2018-02-24 14:31:45
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 4
[user_id] => 2
[blog_id] => 2
[comment_id] => 0
[comment] => Weird, I thought I had more information posted. Must have being moderated out of existence then.
[likes] => 0
[deleted_at] =>
[created_at] => 2018-02-25 03:18:58
[updated_at] => 2018-02-25 03:18:58
)
)
)
comment_id
和parent_id
是一样的。。。我原来叫它comment_id
现在不想改了。
任何 comment_id 为 0 的评论都是父评论,任何 comment_if 为任何数字的评论都是该评论的子评论。
可能造成了一些混乱。抱歉。
我只想知道生成这种数组的最有效方法是什么。我已经使用了 3 或 4 种方法,现在我想知道我是否遗漏了什么。
我认为这是一个不太干净但我相信比依赖 Collection 的 groupBy
$post = Blog::with(['blog_comments' => function($query) {
$query->groupBy('comment_id');
}])->where('slugs', $slug)->first();
$vars['comments'] = $post->blog_comments;
尽管如果您不希望有数千条评论,那么您当前的实现是可以的。
使用它更有效,因为您将 groupBy
工作负载交给数据库管理器而不是 php 本身(当使用 集合的groupBy
).
您还可以声明另一个适合您分组需要的关系。
// Blog.php
public function groupedBlogComments()
{
return $this->hasMany(BlogComment::class)
->groupBy('comment_id');
// I think this can be `return $this->blogComments()
// ->groupBy('comment_id');
}
// you can still have this, if ever you do not want grouped comments
public function blogComments()
{
return $this->hasMany(BlogComment::class);
}
// Controller
$vars['comments'] = $post->groupedBlogComments;
或者更好的是,在您的 BlogComment
模型中定义一个范围,然后在任何地方使用它。
// BlogComment.php
public function scopeGroupByCommentId($query)
{
return $query->groupBy('comment_id');
}
// You can eager load your relationships and use the scope.
$post = Blog::with(['blog_comments' => function($query) {
$query->groupByCommentId();
}])->where('slugs', $slug)->first();
$vars['comments'] = $post->blog_comments;
如有错误,欢迎指正。
希望我明白你的意思。