如何在 Frama-C 中使用 vstmt_aux 访问我的语句

How can I visit my statements with vstmt_aux in Frama-C

我正在开发一个用于标量替换的插件。我对声明访问者有些困难。我想分析循环中的指令,对于每条指令,我需要知道它是否包含在循环中,这个循环本身是否包含在另一个循环中。例如,这是我的 vstmt_aux:

的一个简单示例
method! vstmt_aux s = 
match s.skind with
| Loop(_, body, l, _, _) -> begin
  let lp = (fst l).Lexing.pos_lnum in 
  Format.printf "Find outer loop at line %d @.\n" lp;
  let bst = body.bstmts in List.iter(fun vbody -> 
    match vbody.skind with
    | Loop(_, subbody, lsub, _, _) -> begin
      let ls = (fst lsub).Lexing.pos_lnum in 
      Format.printf "Find inner loop at line %d @.\n" ls;
      let sub_st = subbody.bstmts in List.iter(fun ss_body ->
        match ss_body.skind with
        | Instr(ii) -> Format.printf "Find instruction %a inside inner loop. @.\n" Printer.pp_instr ii 
        | Loop(_, l_sub, lss, _, _) -> begin
          let nss = (fst lss).Lexing.pos_lnum in 
          Format.printf "Find inner inner loop at line %d @.\n" nss;
          let ss_st = l_sub.bstmts in List.iter(fun ss ->
            match ss.skind with
            | Instr(iii) -> Format.printf "Find instruction %a inner inner loop. @.\n" Printer.pp_instr iii
            | _ -> ()
          ) ss_st
        end 
        | _ -> ()
      ) sub_st;
    end
    | Instr(iloop) -> Format.printf "Find instruction %a inside outer loop. @.\n" Printer.pp_instr iloop
    | _ -> ()
  ) bst;
  Cil.SkipChildren
end
| Instr(i) -> Format.printf "Find instruction %a. @.\n" Printer.pp_instr i; Cil.SkipChildren
| _ -> Cil.DoChildren

以及我要分析的代码示例:

void test(int ni, int nj, int nk, float alpha, float *tmp, float *A) {
  int i, j, k;
  for (i = 0; i < ni; i++) 
  for (j = 0; j < nk; j++) 
    A[i * nk + j] = (float) ((i*j+1) % ni) / ni;

  for (i = 0; i < ni; i++) 
    for (j = 0; j < nj; j++) {
      tmp[i * nj + j] = 0.0;
      for (k = 0; k < nk; ++k) 
        tmp[i * nj + j] += alpha * A[i * nk + k] * A[i * nk + k];
    }
}

当我运行这个c代码的脚本时,只检测到指令A[i * nk + j] = (float) ((i*j+1) % ni) / ni;

Find instruction *(A + (i * nk + j)) = (float)((i * j + 1) % ni) / (float)ni; inside inner loop.

当我在循环模式情况下使用 DoChildren 而不是 SkipChildren 时,循环内的所有指令都会被检测到不止一次。例如:

Find instruction *(A + (i * nk + j)) = (float)((i * j + 1) % ni) / (float)ni; inside inner loop.

Find instruction *(A + (i * nk + j)) = (float)((i * j + 1) % ni) / (float)ni; inside outer loop.

Find instruction *(A + (i * nk + j)) = (float)((i * j + 1) % ni) / (float)ni;.

只有第一条消息是正确的。

Find instruction *(tmp + (i * nj + j)) = (float)0.0;.

当我在每个循环和 DoChildren 的指令周围添加大括号时,所有指令都由模式 | Instr(i) -> Format.printf "Find instruction %a. @.\n" Printer.pp_instr i; Cil.SkipChildren.

检测到

你知道我该如何解决这个问题吗? 谢谢

我认为最简单的答案是显示 Kernel_function.find_enclosing_loop 的代码,即 returns 给定语句所属的最内层循环(如果该语句是,则引发 Not_found不在任何循环中)。请注意,主要由于历史原因,原始代码继承自Cil.nopCilVisitor,但这在这里无关紧要,除非您有非常特殊的用途,否则应该首选Visitor.frama_c_inplace

let find_enclosing_loop kf stmt =
  let module Res = struct exception Found of Cil_types.stmt end in
  let vis = object
    inherit Visitor.frama_c_inplace
    val loops = Stack.create ()
    method! vstmt_aux s =
      match s.skind with
        | Loop _ ->
          Stack.push s loops;
          Cil.DoChildrenPost (fun s -> ignore (Stack.pop loops); s)
        | _ when Cil_datatype.Stmt.equal s stmt ->
          raise (Res.Found (Stack.top loops))
        | _ -> Cil.DoChildren
  end
  in
  try
    (match stmt.skind with
      | Loop _ -> stmt
      | _ ->
        ignore
          (Visitor.visitFramacFunction vis (get_definition kf));
        raise Not_found)
  with
    | No_Definition -> raise Not_found (* Not the good kf obviously. *)
    | Stack.Empty -> raise Not_found (* statement outside of a loop *)
    | Res.Found s -> s

基本上,这个想法是你维护一个当前访问过的循环的堆栈,每次到达一个感兴趣的语句时,你可以检查堆栈中有多少元素。当您完成访问循环的子级时,您只需弹出堆栈(因此 DoChildrenPost)。