回退到复制构造函数不起作用？

Question

我认为当我删除 B 中的移动构造函数时，下面的代码仍然可以正常编译，因为它仍然应该使用复制构造函数来构造 B 对象。为什么编译器现在会抱怨。没有 =delete 它就不会调用复制构造函数，因为它不允许提供默认的移动构造函数！）

class B{
    public:
    B(){}
    ~B(){}
    B & operator=(const B & b){
        std::cout << " cannot move -> copy " << std::endl; 
        return *this;
    }
    B(const B & v){
        std::cout << " cannot move -> copy " << std::endl;        
    }

    // B(B && b) = delete; // uncomment this!
};


int main()
{
    B b( B{} ); 
}

clang 3.6 的编译器输出 (Live code)

main.cpp:27:7: error: call to deleted constructor of 'B'

    B b( B{} );

      ^  ~~~

main.cpp:21:5: note: 'B' has been explicitly marked deleted here

    B(B && b) = delete;

    ^

1 error generated.

Answer 1

定义已删除的函数仍处于声明状态。除其他事项外，它正常参与重载决议 - 但如果重载决议实际选择它，则程序格式错误（[dcl.fct.def.delete]/2）：

A program that refers to a deleted function implicitly or explicitly, other than to declare it, is ill-formed. [ Note: This includes calling the function implicitly or explicitly and forming a pointer or pointer-to-member to the function. It applies even for references in expressions that are not potentially-evaluated. If a function is overloaded, it is referenced only if the function is selected by overload resolution. —end note ]

这与根本未声明的函数不同。不存在的声明当然不参与重载决议。

回退到复制构造函数不起作用？

Fallback to copy constructor not working?

c++

copy-constructor

move-semantics

c++11

c++14