Java 同步实例成员不能以嵌套方式工作

Question

在使用Java synchronized 进行编程时，我碰巧发现了一种用法，但并不像我预期的那样有效。也就是说，在线程 A 中，它访问两个嵌套同步块内的实例成员（内容）：

synchronized(this){
    synchronized (content) {content = str;}
}

而在线程 B 中，它仅在一个同步块中访问相同的内容：

synchronized (content) {content = str;}

我希望这可以正常使用

synchronized (content) {content = str;}

然而，事实并非如此。它可以工作，因为没有同步。完整代码和日志如下：

public class JavaSync {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SyncContent syncContent = new SyncContent("JavaSync");

        ThreadA a = new ThreadA(syncContent);
        a.setName("A");
        a.start();

        ThreadB b = new ThreadB(syncContent);
        b.setName("B");
        b.start();

        ThreadC c = new ThreadC(syncContent);
        c.setName("C");
        c.start();
    }
}

class SyncContent {
    volatile String content = new String();

    public SyncContent(String content) {
        this.content = content;
    }

    private double timeConsuming() {
        double a, b, c;
        double sum = 0;
        for (int i = 1; i < 2000000; i++) {
            a = i + sum / ( i * 19);
            b = a / 17;
            c = b * 23;
            sum += (b + c - a) / (a + i);
        }
        return sum;
    }

    synchronized public void syncFunc(String str) {
        System.out.println("syncFunc.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " enter: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
        synchronized (content) {
            System.out.println("syncFunc.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content old: " + content);
            content = str;
            System.out.println("syncFunc.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content new: " + content);
            //Thread.sleep(2000);  // InterruptedException
            System.out.println("syncFunc.Thread: dummy result: " + timeConsuming());
            System.out.println("syncFunc.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content final: " + content);
        }
        System.out.println("syncFunc.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " exit: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
        /*try {
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }*/
    }

    public void syncThis(String str) {
        synchronized(this) {
            System.out.println("syncThis.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " enter: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
            synchronized (content) {
                System.out.println("syncThis.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content old: " + content);
                content = str;
                System.out.println("syncThis.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content new: " + content);
                //Thread.sleep(2000);  // InterruptedException
                System.out.println("syncThis.Thread: dummy result: " + timeConsuming());
                System.out.println("syncThis.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content final: " + content);
            }
            System.out.println("syncThis.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " exit: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
            /*try {
            } catch (Exception e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }*/
        }
    }

    public void syncVariable(String str) {
        synchronized(content) {
            System.out.println("syncVariable.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " enter: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
            System.out.println("syncVariable.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content old: " + content);
            content = str;
            System.out.println("syncVariable.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " content new: " + content);
            System.out.println("syncVariable.Thread: " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " exit: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
        }
    }
}

class ThreadA extends Thread {
    private SyncContent syncContent;
    private String me = "ThreadA";

    public ThreadA(SyncContent syncContent) {
        super();
        this.syncContent = syncContent;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
        syncContent.syncThis(me);
    }
}


class ThreadB extends Thread {
    private SyncContent syncContent;
    private String me = "ThreadB";

    public ThreadB(SyncContent syncContent) {
        super();
        this.syncContent = syncContent;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
        syncContent.syncFunc(me);
    }
}

class ThreadC extends Thread {
    private SyncContent syncContent;
    private String me = "ThreadC";

    public ThreadC(SyncContent syncContent) {
        super();
        this.syncContent = syncContent;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
        syncContent.syncVariable(me);
    }
}

日志：

syncThis.Thread: A enter: 1542076529822
syncThis.Thread: A content old: JavaSync
syncThis.Thread: A content new: ThreadA
syncVariable.Thread: C enter: 1542076529823
syncVariable.Thread: C content old: ThreadA
syncVariable.Thread: C content new: ThreadC
syncVariable.Thread: C exit: 1542076529824
syncThis.Thread: dummy result: 411764.5149938948
syncThis.Thread: A content final: ThreadC
syncThis.Thread: A exit: 1542076529862
syncFunc.Thread: B enter: 1542076529862
syncFunc.Thread: B content old: ThreadC
syncFunc.Thread: B content new: ThreadB
syncFunc.Thread: dummy result: 411764.5149938948
syncFunc.Thread: B content final: ThreadB
syncFunc.Thread: B exit: 1542076529897

为什么没有发生这种情况？

Answer 1

synchronized 适用于对象，而不是变量名。您通过锁定 content 进入 synchronized 块，但随后在该块中，您为其分配了一个不同的对象。下次您尝试同步 content 时，您将同步 不同的对象 ，因此之前持有的锁不会干扰它。

如果您使用可变对象，例如 StringBuilder 并改为更改其数据，您将看到您期望的行为：

synchronized (content) {
    content.setLength(0); // Remove the old content
    content.append(str); // Set the new content
    // Rest of the code...

Java 同步实例成员不能以嵌套方式工作

Java synchronized instance member doesn't work in a nested way

java

multithreading

synchronized