我将如何为使用标准输出的东西编写测试?
How would i write a test for something which uses stdout?
我正在尝试提高此文件的测试覆盖率
'use strict'
/**
* Returns the logging options we're using
*
* @param {String} name Name of the logger. Should be service name. e.g. ciitizen-file-service
* @returns {Object} The logging options we're using
* @private
*/
function getLoggerOptions(name) {
return {
name: name,
streams: [
{
level: 'info',
stream: stdOutStream()
}, {
level: 'error',
stream: stdErrStream()
}
, {
level: 'debug',
stream: stdOutStream()
},
{
level: 'warn',
stream: stdOutStream()
},
{
level: 'fatal',
stream: stdErrStream()
}
]
}
}
/**
* Creates a stream that writes to stdout
*
* @param {Object} info The log info
* @returns {Object} An object which logs to stdout
* @private
*/
function stdOutStream() {
return {
write: log => {
// Change log level number to name and write it out
log.level = bunyan.nameFromLevel[log.level]
process.stdout.write(JSON.stringify(log) + '\n')
}
}
}
/**
* Creates a stream that writes to stderr
*
* @param {Object} info The log info
* @returns {Object} An object which logs to stderr
* @private
*/
function stdErrStream() {
return {
write: log => {
// Change log level number to name and write it out
log.level = bunyan.nameFromLevel[log.level]
process.stderr.write(JSON.stringify(log) + '\n')
}
}
}
module.exports = { getLoggerOptions }
我目前有这个测试
'use strict'
const expect = require('chai').expect
const { getLoggerOptions } = require('../src/helpers')
describe.only('#getLoggerOptions', () => {
it('should return the logger options', () => {
expect(getLoggerOptions('test')).to.be.an('object')
})
})
这会在单元测试覆盖率方面产生差距
我如何编写测试来覆盖这段代码?
您只是断言 getLoggerOptions(...)
应该 returns 一个对象,但您没有访问该对象。
例如,除了发布的测试之外,尝试添加如下测试:
describe.only('#probeLoggerOptions', () => {
it('should do expected logging stuff', () => {
const {name, streams} = getLoggerOptions('test');
for (let stream of streams) {
console.log(`getting logopt for level ${stream.level}`);
expect(stream.stream.write(log), /* ... what to expect */);
}
});
});
现在测试正在调用每个对象中的 write
函数。
EXTRA:如果您拥有代码,最好的方法是重构它以使其更易于测试。例如,不是直接写入高级 process
流,而是创建一个 WritableStream
,写入它,然后通过管道传输到所需的 process
流。
function configureStream(writable = process.stdout, data = null, msg = 'done') {
const stream = fs.createReadStream('/tmp/log');
stream.read(data);
stream.pipe(writable);
}
function stdOutStream() {
return {
write: log => {
// Change log level number to name and write it out
log.level = bunyan.nameFromLevel[log.level];
configureStream(data = JSON.stringify(log) + '\n');
}
}
}
除了能够单独测试 configureStream
之外,您还可以将每个日志记录过程的内容抽象为一个函数,以减少测试面。现在您还可以连接到流的事件,例如 'pipe' 或 'finish' 以检查正在记录的内容。
我正在尝试提高此文件的测试覆盖率
'use strict'
/**
* Returns the logging options we're using
*
* @param {String} name Name of the logger. Should be service name. e.g. ciitizen-file-service
* @returns {Object} The logging options we're using
* @private
*/
function getLoggerOptions(name) {
return {
name: name,
streams: [
{
level: 'info',
stream: stdOutStream()
}, {
level: 'error',
stream: stdErrStream()
}
, {
level: 'debug',
stream: stdOutStream()
},
{
level: 'warn',
stream: stdOutStream()
},
{
level: 'fatal',
stream: stdErrStream()
}
]
}
}
/**
* Creates a stream that writes to stdout
*
* @param {Object} info The log info
* @returns {Object} An object which logs to stdout
* @private
*/
function stdOutStream() {
return {
write: log => {
// Change log level number to name and write it out
log.level = bunyan.nameFromLevel[log.level]
process.stdout.write(JSON.stringify(log) + '\n')
}
}
}
/**
* Creates a stream that writes to stderr
*
* @param {Object} info The log info
* @returns {Object} An object which logs to stderr
* @private
*/
function stdErrStream() {
return {
write: log => {
// Change log level number to name and write it out
log.level = bunyan.nameFromLevel[log.level]
process.stderr.write(JSON.stringify(log) + '\n')
}
}
}
module.exports = { getLoggerOptions }
我目前有这个测试
'use strict'
const expect = require('chai').expect
const { getLoggerOptions } = require('../src/helpers')
describe.only('#getLoggerOptions', () => {
it('should return the logger options', () => {
expect(getLoggerOptions('test')).to.be.an('object')
})
})
这会在单元测试覆盖率方面产生差距
我如何编写测试来覆盖这段代码?
您只是断言 getLoggerOptions(...)
应该 returns 一个对象,但您没有访问该对象。
例如,除了发布的测试之外,尝试添加如下测试:
describe.only('#probeLoggerOptions', () => {
it('should do expected logging stuff', () => {
const {name, streams} = getLoggerOptions('test');
for (let stream of streams) {
console.log(`getting logopt for level ${stream.level}`);
expect(stream.stream.write(log), /* ... what to expect */);
}
});
});
现在测试正在调用每个对象中的 write
函数。
EXTRA:如果您拥有代码,最好的方法是重构它以使其更易于测试。例如,不是直接写入高级 process
流,而是创建一个 WritableStream
,写入它,然后通过管道传输到所需的 process
流。
function configureStream(writable = process.stdout, data = null, msg = 'done') {
const stream = fs.createReadStream('/tmp/log');
stream.read(data);
stream.pipe(writable);
}
function stdOutStream() {
return {
write: log => {
// Change log level number to name and write it out
log.level = bunyan.nameFromLevel[log.level];
configureStream(data = JSON.stringify(log) + '\n');
}
}
}
除了能够单独测试 configureStream
之外,您还可以将每个日志记录过程的内容抽象为一个函数,以减少测试面。现在您还可以连接到流的事件,例如 'pipe' 或 'finish' 以检查正在记录的内容。