clang:候选模板被忽略:替换失败:无法使用 class 说明符引用 typedef 'type'
clang: candidate template ignored: substitution failure: typedef 'type' cannot be referenced with a class specifier
与 GCC 5 相比,Clang 6 抱怨以下错误:
candidate template ignored: substitution failure [with U = char, Us = ]: typedef 'type' cannot be referenced with a class specifier
Tuple(U&& u, Us&&... rest) : m_element(::std::forward(u)), m_rest(::std::forward(rest...)...)
我使用自己的 Tuple 实现
//! Declaration of tuple typename with multiple elements
template<typename T, typename... Ts>
class Tuple<T, Ts...>
{
public:
T m_element;
Tuple<Ts...> m_rest;
template<typename U,
typename... Us,
typename = class ::std::enable_if<!::std::is_base_of<Tuple,typename ::std::decay<U>::type>::value>::type>
Tuple(U&& u, Us&&... rest) : m_element(::std::forward<U>(u)), m_rest(::std::forward<Us>(rest)...)
{
}
};
template<typename... Ts>
Tuple<typename ::std::decay<Ts>::type...> make_tuple(Ts&&... elements)
{
return Tuple<typename ::std::decay<Ts>::type...>(::std::forward<Ts>(elements)...);
}
clang 与 GCC 有何不同?我该如何解决这个问题?
谢谢!
What is clang doing differently than GCC? And how can I fix this?
不确定谁是对的,也不确定这是否能解决您的问题(没有关于您问题的最小但完整的示例,我无法检查它)但是我有一个错误(仅限 clang++),当我更改 class
与 typename
所以我建议
template<typename U,
typename... Us,
// ........VVVVVVVV <--- "typename" here, not "class"
typename = typename ::std::enable_if<!::std::is_base_of<Tuple,typename ::std::decay<U>::type>::value>::type>
Tuple(U&& u, Us&&... rest) : m_element(::std::forward<U>(u)),
m_rest(::std::forward<Us>(rest)...)
{ }
与 GCC 5 相比,Clang 6 抱怨以下错误:
candidate template ignored: substitution failure [with U = char, Us = ]: typedef 'type' cannot be referenced with a class specifier Tuple(U&& u, Us&&... rest) : m_element(::std::forward(u)), m_rest(::std::forward(rest...)...)
我使用自己的 Tuple 实现
//! Declaration of tuple typename with multiple elements
template<typename T, typename... Ts>
class Tuple<T, Ts...>
{
public:
T m_element;
Tuple<Ts...> m_rest;
template<typename U,
typename... Us,
typename = class ::std::enable_if<!::std::is_base_of<Tuple,typename ::std::decay<U>::type>::value>::type>
Tuple(U&& u, Us&&... rest) : m_element(::std::forward<U>(u)), m_rest(::std::forward<Us>(rest)...)
{
}
};
template<typename... Ts>
Tuple<typename ::std::decay<Ts>::type...> make_tuple(Ts&&... elements)
{
return Tuple<typename ::std::decay<Ts>::type...>(::std::forward<Ts>(elements)...);
}
clang 与 GCC 有何不同?我该如何解决这个问题?
谢谢!
What is clang doing differently than GCC? And how can I fix this?
不确定谁是对的,也不确定这是否能解决您的问题(没有关于您问题的最小但完整的示例,我无法检查它)但是我有一个错误(仅限 clang++),当我更改 class
与 typename
所以我建议
template<typename U,
typename... Us,
// ........VVVVVVVV <--- "typename" here, not "class"
typename = typename ::std::enable_if<!::std::is_base_of<Tuple,typename ::std::decay<U>::type>::value>::type>
Tuple(U&& u, Us&&... rest) : m_element(::std::forward<U>(u)),
m_rest(::std::forward<Us>(rest)...)
{ }