通过 ILGenerator 调用带谓词表达式的 LINQ
Calling LINQ with predicate expression through ILGenerator
我正在尝试通过在 运行 时发出 IL 来编译 DynamicMethod。我希望它执行以下操作:
array.OrderByDesc( /* Select Field/Property Expression*/ ).ToArray();
编译 DynamicMethod 的方法有一个 FieldInfo
变量,我想将其用于 OrderByDesc
需要的表达式。
这是我目前的情况:
public static FilterDelegate<T> CreateDelegate<T>( Expression<Func<T, double>> expression )
{
var field = expression.GetFieldInfo();// Extension, gets FieldInfo from expression
...
il.Emit( OpCodes.Ldloc_1 ); // Loads an array (T[])
il.Emit( OpCodes.Call, typeof( Enumerable ).GetMethod( nameof( Enumerable.OrderByDescending ), new Type[0]).MakeGenericMethod( typeof( T ) ) );
il.Emit( OpCodes.Call, typeof( Enumerable ).GetMethod( nameof( Enumerable.ToArray ) ).MakeGenericMethod( typeof( T ) ) );
il.Emit( OpCodes.Stloc_1 ); // Stores the sorted array
}
注意几点:
- 提供的表达式是一个选择器,指定在整个编译方法中使用哪个字段(或 属性 后备值)。
- 此方法不仅仅调用
OrderByDescending()
,还包含大量低级优化。排除排序,预计在大多数情况下运行在40ns以内。
如何使用传递给编译方法的表达式或 FieldInfo
来正确调用 OrderByDescending()
?
我不完全理解你试图通过直接 IL 生成实现什么; OrderByDescending
接受一个名为 "keySelector" 的 Func<TSource, TKey>
参数。因此,您仍然可以在使用此方法的同时生成的唯一 IL 只是一个常规方法调用,它将 "keySelector" 参数传递给 OrderByDescending
方法,除非您打算在 IL 中重新实现 OrderByDescending
.
你有什么理由需要一路下降到 IL 吗?
如果这是针对用户级代码,您可以 "Compile" 将传递给此方法的 expression
并正常调用 OrderByDescending()
,例如
var expression = /* Select Field/Property Expression*/;
array.OrderByDescending(expression.Compile()).ToArray();
如果这是 framework/utility 级代码,您可能会使用 "Expression trees" 而无需一直使用手动 IL。例如
public static FilterDelegate<T> CreateDelegate<T>(Expression<Func<T, double>> expression)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(IEnumerable<T>), "source");
// Your `GetMethod` for OrderByDescending did not work for me,
// so I'll just hand wave about this.
var orderByDescMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethods()
.Single(m => m.Name == nameof(Enumerable.OrderByDescending) &&
m.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), typeof(double));
var toArrayMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethod(nameof(Enumerable.ToArray))
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T));
var orderByExpression = Expression.Call(orderByDescMethod, parameter, expression);
var lambdaBody = Expression.Call(toArrayMethod, orderByExpression);
var lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda<FilterDelegate<T>>(lambdaBody, parameter);
return lambdaExpression.Compile();
}
但是,如果出于某种原因您仍然需要通过 IL 直接发出此消息,则可以使用类似以下的方法。
public static FilterDelegate<T> CreateDelegate<T>(Expression<Func<T, double>> expression)
{
// Your `GetMethod` for OrderByDescending did not work for me,
// so I'll just hand wave about this.
var orderByDescMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethods()
.Single(m => m.Name == nameof(Enumerable.OrderByDescending) &&
m.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), typeof(double));
var toArrayMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethod(nameof(Enumerable.ToArray))
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T));
// TODO: if you don't already have one of these
// you'll probably want to pull this out and re-use it
// rather than making a new one for every delegate
// TODO: if you do share a module builder I don't think it's thread-safe
// so this method will need sufficient locking/synchronization
var dynamicAssemblyName = new AssemblyName { Name = $"{Guid.NewGuid()}" };
var asm = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.DefineDynamicAssembly(dynamicAssemblyName, AssemblyBuilderAccess.Run);
var module = asm.DefineDynamicModule(dynamicAssemblyName.Name);
// Create a class with a static field to hold our compiled expression
var typeBuilder = module.DefineType(
$"{Guid.NewGuid()}",
TypeAttributes.Public | TypeAttributes.Class | TypeAttributes.Sealed | TypeAttributes.Serializable);
var compiledExpressionField = typeBuilder.DefineField(
"CompiledExpression",
typeof(Func<T, double>),
FieldAttributes.Static | FieldAttributes.Private);
var holderType = typeBuilder.CreateType();
var compiledExpression = expression.Compile();
// Get the actual field after we've compiled the type
var compiledExpressionFieldInfo = holderType.GetField(
compiledExpressionField.Name,
BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
// Store the compiled expression in the static field
compiledExpressionFieldInfo.SetValue(null, compiledExpression);
var newDelegate = new DynamicMethod($"{Guid.NewGuid()}",
typeof(IOrderedEnumerable<T>),
new[] { typeof(IEnumerable<T>) },
typeof(ILGen), true);
var il = newDelegate.GetILGenerator();
// Load the array passed into the Delegate (T[])
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
// Load the compiled expression from a static field
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ldsfld, compiledExpressionFieldInfo);
// Call .OrderByDescending()
il.Emit(OpCodes.Call, orderByDescMethod);
// Call .ToArray()
il.Emit(OpCodes.Call, toArrayMethod);
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ret); // Stores the sorted array
return (FilterDelegate<T>)newDelegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(FilterDelegate<T>));
}
我正在尝试通过在 运行 时发出 IL 来编译 DynamicMethod。我希望它执行以下操作:
array.OrderByDesc( /* Select Field/Property Expression*/ ).ToArray();
编译 DynamicMethod 的方法有一个 FieldInfo
变量,我想将其用于 OrderByDesc
需要的表达式。
这是我目前的情况:
public static FilterDelegate<T> CreateDelegate<T>( Expression<Func<T, double>> expression )
{
var field = expression.GetFieldInfo();// Extension, gets FieldInfo from expression
...
il.Emit( OpCodes.Ldloc_1 ); // Loads an array (T[])
il.Emit( OpCodes.Call, typeof( Enumerable ).GetMethod( nameof( Enumerable.OrderByDescending ), new Type[0]).MakeGenericMethod( typeof( T ) ) );
il.Emit( OpCodes.Call, typeof( Enumerable ).GetMethod( nameof( Enumerable.ToArray ) ).MakeGenericMethod( typeof( T ) ) );
il.Emit( OpCodes.Stloc_1 ); // Stores the sorted array
}
注意几点:
- 提供的表达式是一个选择器,指定在整个编译方法中使用哪个字段(或 属性 后备值)。
- 此方法不仅仅调用
OrderByDescending()
,还包含大量低级优化。排除排序,预计在大多数情况下运行在40ns以内。
如何使用传递给编译方法的表达式或 FieldInfo
来正确调用 OrderByDescending()
?
我不完全理解你试图通过直接 IL 生成实现什么; OrderByDescending
接受一个名为 "keySelector" 的 Func<TSource, TKey>
参数。因此,您仍然可以在使用此方法的同时生成的唯一 IL 只是一个常规方法调用,它将 "keySelector" 参数传递给 OrderByDescending
方法,除非您打算在 IL 中重新实现 OrderByDescending
.
你有什么理由需要一路下降到 IL 吗?
如果这是针对用户级代码,您可以 "Compile" 将传递给此方法的 expression
并正常调用 OrderByDescending()
,例如
var expression = /* Select Field/Property Expression*/;
array.OrderByDescending(expression.Compile()).ToArray();
如果这是 framework/utility 级代码,您可能会使用 "Expression trees" 而无需一直使用手动 IL。例如
public static FilterDelegate<T> CreateDelegate<T>(Expression<Func<T, double>> expression)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(IEnumerable<T>), "source");
// Your `GetMethod` for OrderByDescending did not work for me,
// so I'll just hand wave about this.
var orderByDescMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethods()
.Single(m => m.Name == nameof(Enumerable.OrderByDescending) &&
m.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), typeof(double));
var toArrayMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethod(nameof(Enumerable.ToArray))
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T));
var orderByExpression = Expression.Call(orderByDescMethod, parameter, expression);
var lambdaBody = Expression.Call(toArrayMethod, orderByExpression);
var lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda<FilterDelegate<T>>(lambdaBody, parameter);
return lambdaExpression.Compile();
}
但是,如果出于某种原因您仍然需要通过 IL 直接发出此消息,则可以使用类似以下的方法。
public static FilterDelegate<T> CreateDelegate<T>(Expression<Func<T, double>> expression)
{
// Your `GetMethod` for OrderByDescending did not work for me,
// so I'll just hand wave about this.
var orderByDescMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethods()
.Single(m => m.Name == nameof(Enumerable.OrderByDescending) &&
m.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T), typeof(double));
var toArrayMethod = typeof(Enumerable)
.GetMethod(nameof(Enumerable.ToArray))
.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T));
// TODO: if you don't already have one of these
// you'll probably want to pull this out and re-use it
// rather than making a new one for every delegate
// TODO: if you do share a module builder I don't think it's thread-safe
// so this method will need sufficient locking/synchronization
var dynamicAssemblyName = new AssemblyName { Name = $"{Guid.NewGuid()}" };
var asm = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.DefineDynamicAssembly(dynamicAssemblyName, AssemblyBuilderAccess.Run);
var module = asm.DefineDynamicModule(dynamicAssemblyName.Name);
// Create a class with a static field to hold our compiled expression
var typeBuilder = module.DefineType(
$"{Guid.NewGuid()}",
TypeAttributes.Public | TypeAttributes.Class | TypeAttributes.Sealed | TypeAttributes.Serializable);
var compiledExpressionField = typeBuilder.DefineField(
"CompiledExpression",
typeof(Func<T, double>),
FieldAttributes.Static | FieldAttributes.Private);
var holderType = typeBuilder.CreateType();
var compiledExpression = expression.Compile();
// Get the actual field after we've compiled the type
var compiledExpressionFieldInfo = holderType.GetField(
compiledExpressionField.Name,
BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
// Store the compiled expression in the static field
compiledExpressionFieldInfo.SetValue(null, compiledExpression);
var newDelegate = new DynamicMethod($"{Guid.NewGuid()}",
typeof(IOrderedEnumerable<T>),
new[] { typeof(IEnumerable<T>) },
typeof(ILGen), true);
var il = newDelegate.GetILGenerator();
// Load the array passed into the Delegate (T[])
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
// Load the compiled expression from a static field
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ldsfld, compiledExpressionFieldInfo);
// Call .OrderByDescending()
il.Emit(OpCodes.Call, orderByDescMethod);
// Call .ToArray()
il.Emit(OpCodes.Call, toArrayMethod);
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ret); // Stores the sorted array
return (FilterDelegate<T>)newDelegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(FilterDelegate<T>));
}