什么是 do_cos_slow.isra?
What is do_cos_slow.isra?
我写了一个简单的代码来测试 prof
。
double bar_compute (double d) {
double t = std::abs(d);
t += std::sqrt(d);
t += std::cos(d);
return t;
}
// Do some computation n times
double foo_compute(unsigned n) {
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_real_distribution<double> dist(0.0, 1.0);
double total = 0;
for (int i=0; i<n; i++) {
double d = dist(mt);
total += bar_compute(d);
}
return total;
}
当我 运行 prof
并查看输出时
56.14% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] __cos_avx
27.34% runcode runcode [.] _Z11foo_computej
13.92% runcode runcode [.] _Z11bar_computed
0.86% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] do_cos_slow.isra.1
0.44% runcode runcode [.] cos@plt
0.41% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] sloww1
0.35% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] __dubcos
0.17% runcode ld-2.23.so [.] _dl_lookup_symbol_x
do_cos_slow.isra
和sloww1
是什么意思?
我可以使用更快的 cos
版本吗?不然怎么会叫慢呢?
do_cos_slow
来自其在 glibc/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c. It is called do_cos_slow
because it is more precise than the function it is based on do_cos
as per the comment above its declaration on Line 164.
中的声明
.isra
是因为该函数是经过IPA SRA优化后的版本Stack Overflow Answer, What does the GCC function suffix “isra” mean?
sloww1
是一个根据上面的注释计算 sin(x+dx) 的函数。
关于更快的cos版本,我不确定是否有更快的版本,但是如果你更新你的glibc或提供libm的libc实现,至少glibc 2.28,那么你会得到Wilco的结果Dijkstra 删除了这些慢速路径函数并重构了 dosincos,从而提高了速度。
Refactor the sincos implementation - rather than rely on odd partial inlining
of preprocessed portions from sin and cos, explicitly write out the cases.
This makes sincos much easier to maintain and provides an additional 16-20%
speedup between 0 and 2^27. The overall speedup of sincos is 48% over this range.
Between 0 and PI it is 66% faster.
您可以尝试的其他替代方案是其他 libc 或 libm 实现,或其他 cos 实现,包括 avx_mathfun or avx_mathfun with some fixes for newer GCC or supersimd。
我写了一个简单的代码来测试 prof
。
double bar_compute (double d) {
double t = std::abs(d);
t += std::sqrt(d);
t += std::cos(d);
return t;
}
// Do some computation n times
double foo_compute(unsigned n) {
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_real_distribution<double> dist(0.0, 1.0);
double total = 0;
for (int i=0; i<n; i++) {
double d = dist(mt);
total += bar_compute(d);
}
return total;
}
当我 运行 prof
并查看输出时
56.14% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] __cos_avx
27.34% runcode runcode [.] _Z11foo_computej
13.92% runcode runcode [.] _Z11bar_computed
0.86% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] do_cos_slow.isra.1
0.44% runcode runcode [.] cos@plt
0.41% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] sloww1
0.35% runcode libm-2.23.so [.] __dubcos
0.17% runcode ld-2.23.so [.] _dl_lookup_symbol_x
do_cos_slow.isra
和sloww1
是什么意思?
我可以使用更快的 cos
版本吗?不然怎么会叫慢呢?
do_cos_slow
来自其在 glibc/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c. It is called do_cos_slow
because it is more precise than the function it is based on do_cos
as per the comment above its declaration on Line 164.
.isra
是因为该函数是经过IPA SRA优化后的版本Stack Overflow Answer, What does the GCC function suffix “isra” mean?
sloww1
是一个根据上面的注释计算 sin(x+dx) 的函数。
关于更快的cos版本,我不确定是否有更快的版本,但是如果你更新你的glibc或提供libm的libc实现,至少glibc 2.28,那么你会得到Wilco的结果Dijkstra 删除了这些慢速路径函数并重构了 dosincos,从而提高了速度。
Refactor the sincos implementation - rather than rely on odd partial inlining
of preprocessed portions from sin and cos, explicitly write out the cases.
This makes sincos much easier to maintain and provides an additional 16-20%
speedup between 0 and 2^27. The overall speedup of sincos is 48% over this range.
Between 0 and PI it is 66% faster.
您可以尝试的其他替代方案是其他 libc 或 libm 实现,或其他 cos 实现,包括 avx_mathfun or avx_mathfun with some fixes for newer GCC or supersimd。