在 Oracle ALL_CONSTRAINTS 中仅查找用户定义的检查约束

Find only user-defined check constraints in Oracle ALL_CONSTRAINTS

考虑这个 table 定义:

CREATE TABLE foo (
  a int not null,              -- Implicit not null constraint
  b int check (b is not null), -- Explicit not null constraint
  c int check (c > 1)          -- Explicit constraint
);

我想发现所有显式检查约束,即用户使用 CHECK 语法在其 DDL 语句中定义的约束。这些约束可能会或可能不会被命名。在上面的示例中,它们没有命名。我怎样才能只发现 "explicit" 检查约束,而忽略隐式约束?

例如当我查询 ALL_CONSTRAINTS:

SELECT *
FROM all_constraints
WHERE constraint_type = 'C'
AND table_name = 'FOO';

我看不出有什么方法可以区分 explicitness/implicitness:

CONSTRAINT_NAME   SEARCH_CONDITION   GENERATED
---------------------------------------------------
SYS_C00120656     "A" IS NOT NULL    GENERATED NAME
SYS_C00120657     b is not null      GENERATED NAME
SYS_C00120658     c > 1              GENERATED NAME

我当然可以对某人使用确切 "COLUMN_NAME" IS NOT NULL 语法(包括双引号)的可能性进行启发式分析:

SELECT *
FROM all_constraints
WHERE constraint_type = 'C'
AND table_name = 'FOO'
AND search_condition_vc NOT IN (
  SELECT '"' || column_name || '" IS NOT NULL'
  FROM all_tab_cols
  WHERE table_name = 'FOO'
  AND nullable = 'N'
);

这给了我想要的结果:

CONSTRAINT_NAME   SEARCH_CONDITION   GENERATED
---------------------------------------------------
SYS_C00120657     b is not null      GENERATED NAME
SYS_C00120658     c > 1              GENERATED NAME

我把这个作为答案放在这里,因为这对某些人来说可能已经足够好了,但我真的想要一个更可靠的解决方案。

想法:您可以将 table 与其对应的 "shadow" 进行比较。 CREATE TABLE AS 不保留用户定义的检查约束:

-- original table
CREATE TABLE foo (
  id int PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
  a int not null,              -- Implicit not null constraint
  b int check (b is not null), -- Explicit not null constraint
  c int check (c = 1),          -- Explicit constraint
  d INT CONSTRAINT my_check CHECK (d = 3)
);

-- clone without data(it should be stored in different schema than actual objects)
CREATE TABLE shadow_foo
AS
SELECT * 
FROM foo 
WHERE 1=2;

-- for Oracle 18c you could consider private temporary tables
CREATE PRIVATE TEMPORARY TABLE ora$shadow_foo ON COMMIT DROP DEFINITION
AS
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE 1=2;

和主要查询:

SELECT c.*
FROM (SELECT * FROM all_constraints WHERE TABLE_NAME NOT LIKE 'SHADOW%') c
LEFT JOIN (SELECT * FROM all_constraints WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE 'SHADOW%') c2
  ON c2.table_name = 'SHADOW_' || c.table_name
 AND c2.owner = c.owner
 AND c2.search_condition_vc = c.search_condition_vc
WHERE c2.owner IS NULL
  AND c.constraint_type = 'C'
  AND c.owner  LIKE 'FIDDLE%'

db<>fiddle demo

SYS.CDEF$.TYPE# 知道隐式和显式检查约束之间的区别。隐式检查约束存储为7,显式检查约束存储为1.

--Explicit constraints only.
select constraint_name, search_condition
from dba_constraints
where (owner, constraint_name) not in
    (
        --Implicit constraints.
        select dba_users.username, sys.con$.name
        from sys.cdef$
        join sys.con$
            on cdef$.con# = con$.con#
        join dba_users
            on sys.con$.owner# = dba_users.user_id
        where cdef$.type# = 7
    )
    and constraint_type = 'C'
    and table_name = 'FOO'
order by 1;


CONSTRAINT_NAME   SEARCH_CONDITION
---------------   ----------------
SYS_C00106940     b is not null
SYS_C00106941     c > 1

此解决方案的明显缺点是依赖未记录的 tables。但它似乎确实比依赖条件文本更准确。一些隐式检查约束是 not 用双引号创建的。我无法重现该问题,但我发现它发生在 table SYS.TAB$.