为什么在演示中同步工作时 ReentrantLock 不工作？

Question

我正在尝试遵循 ReentrantLock Example in Java, Difference between synchronized vs ReentrantLock 类教程。我在 as

上有一个以 -ea 开头的演示

public class ReentrantLockZero {
    private static ReentrantLock CountLock = new ReentrantLock();
    private static int count = 0;
    private static final int RESULT_COUNT = 10_000;

    public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
        ThreadPoolExecutor threadPoolExecutor = getMyCachedThreadPool();
        for (int i = 0; i < RESULT_COUNT; ++i) {
            threadPoolExecutor.submit(ReentrantLockZero::getCount);
            threadPoolExecutor.submit(ReentrantLockZero::getCountUsingLock);
        }
        threadPoolExecutor.shutdown();
        threadPoolExecutor.awaitTermination(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
        assert count == RESULT_COUNT * 2;
    }

    private static synchronized int getCount() {
        count++;
        System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " counting in synchronized: " + count);
        return count;
    }

    private static int getCountUsingLock() {
        CountLock.lock();
        try {
            count++;
            System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " counting in lock: " + count);
            return count;
        } finally {
            CountLock.unlock();
        }
    }
}

当使用ReentrantLock作为第二种方法getCountUsingLock时，我会得到java.lang.AssertionError，但是当我将它们注释掉以使用synchronized时，就可以了。

考虑到它的ReentrantLock，我删除了class中定义的CountLock并使用本地锁如下，但它仍然不起作用。

private static int getCountUsingLock() {
    ReentrantLock countLock = new ReentrantLock();
    countLock.lock();
    try {
        count++;
        System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " counting in lock: " + count);
        return count;
    } finally {
        countLock.unlock();
    }
}

这里遗漏了什么？

任何帮助将不胜感激;)

Answer 1

有点像我自己的傻瓜。

之所以如此，是因为我实际上锁定了不同的对象。

private static synchronized int getCount()

等于

private static synchronized (ReentrantLockZero.class) int getCount()

而 new ReentrantLock(); 始终是一个新对象，无法使用不同的锁来消除 race condition。

真傻，下面的演示很容易解决这个问题

public class ReentrantLockZero {
    private static ReentrantLock CountLock = new ReentrantLock();
    private static int synchronisedCount = 0;
    private static int lockedCount = 0;
    private static final int RESULT_COUNT = 10_000;

    public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
        ThreadPoolExecutor threadPoolExecutor = getMyCachedThreadPool();
        for (int i = 0; i < RESULT_COUNT; ++i) {
            threadPoolExecutor.submit(ReentrantLockZero::getSynchronisedCount);
            threadPoolExecutor.submit(ReentrantLockZero::getCountUsingLock);
        }
        threadPoolExecutor.shutdown();
        threadPoolExecutor.awaitTermination(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
        assert synchronisedCount == RESULT_COUNT;
        assert lockedCount == RESULT_COUNT;
    }

    private static synchronized int getSynchronisedCount() {
        synchronisedCount++;
        System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " counting in synchronized: " + synchronisedCount);
        return synchronisedCount;
    }

    private static int getCountUsingLock() {
        CountLock.lock();
        try {
            lockedCount++;
            System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " counting in lock: " + lockedCount);
            return lockedCount;
        } finally {
            CountLock.unlock();
        }
    }
}

为什么 synchronized 有效？因为这两种方法只锁定一个锁，所以直接解决了竞争条件。

_{有点容易被教程骗了；我真丢人;(}

为什么在演示中同步工作时 ReentrantLock 不工作？

Why ReentrantLock is not working while synchronized work in the demo?

java

java-8

synchronized

reentrantlock