如何根据利用率比较两个电路

How to compare two circuits based on their utilization

我有一些硬件IP需要合成。 IP 包含几个我可以玩的通用参数。综合和实施后,每种参数组合都会给我不同的利用率报告。

例如,对于两种不同的配置 Design_1Design_2,我在 Vivado 2018.1 中得到以下信息。第 3 行是 Design_2 的值除以 Design_1.

的值的比率

正如您在这个简单示例中所见,Design_2 的 Slice LUT 较少,但 F7 Mux 略多。

我的问题是如何得出每一个的成本?我应该为 Slice LUT 或寄存器等赋予特权吗?

+----------+-------------------+-----------------+------------------+----------+-------------------+-------------------+---------------+---------------------+----------------+------+------------+--------------+-------------+------------+----------+---------+------------+---------+---------------------------+-------------------------+-----------------------------+--------+--------+----------+---------+------------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------+---------+----------+-----------+---------+
|   Name   |    Slice LUTs     | Slice Registers |     F7 Muxes     | F8 Muxes |       Slice       |   LUT as Logic    | LUT as Memory | LUT Flip Flop Pairs | Block RAM Tile | DSPs | Bonded IOB | Bonded IPADs | PHY_CONTROL | PHASER_REF | OUT_FIFO | IN_FIFO | IDELAYCTRL | IBUFDS  | PHASER_OUT/PHASER_OUT_PHY | PHASER_IN/PHASER_IN_PHY | IDELAYE2/IDELAYE2_FINEDELAY | ILOGIC | OLOGIC | BUFGCTRL |  BUFIO  | MMCME2_ADV | PLLE2_ADV | BUFMRCE | BUFHCE |  BUFR   | BSCANE2 | CAPTUREE2 | DNA_PORT | EFUSE_USR | FRAME_ECCE2 | ICAPE2  | PCIE_2_1 | STARTUPE2 |  XADC   |
+----------+-------------------+-----------------+------------------+----------+-------------------+-------------------+---------------+---------------------+----------------+------+------------+--------------+-------------+------------+----------+---------+------------+---------+---------------------------+-------------------------+-----------------------------+--------+--------+----------+---------+------------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------+---------+----------+-----------+---------+
| Design_1 |             34124 |           16913 |             1453 |       91 |             10272 |             31538 |          2586 |                9020 |             37 |   11 |        125 | 0            |           1 |          1 |        4 |       2 |          1 | 0       |                         4 |                       2 |                          16 |     16 |     46 |       10 | 0       |          2 |         2 | 0       |      2 | 0       |       4 | 0         | 0        | 0         | 0           | 0       | 0        | 0         | 0       |
| Design_2 |             34097 |           16913 |             1550 |       91 |             10189 |             31511 |          2586 |                9021 |             37 |   11 |        125 | 0            |           1 |          1 |        4 |       2 |          1 | 0       |                         4 |                       2 |                          16 |     16 |     46 |       10 | 0       |          2 |         2 | 0       |      2 | 0       |       4 | 0         | 0        | 0         | 0           | 0       | 0        | 0         | 0       |
| -------- |                   |                 |                  |          |                   |                   |               |                     |                |      |            |              |             |            |          |         |            |         |                           |                         |                             |        |        |          |         |            |           |         |        |         |         |           |          |           |             |         |          |           |         |
| (2)/(1)  | 0.999208768022506 |               1 | 1.06675843083276 |        1 | 0.991919781931464 | 0.999143889910584 |             1 |    1.00011086474501 |              1 |    1 |          1 | #DIV/0!      |           1 |          1 |        1 |       1 |          1 | #DIV/0! |                         1 |                       1 |                           1 |      1 |      1 |        1 | #DIV/0! |          1 |         1 | #DIV/0! |      1 | #DIV/0! |       1 | #DIV/0!   | #DIV/0!  | #DIV/0!   | #DIV/0!     | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0!  | #DIV/0!   | #DIV/0! |
+----------+-------------------+-----------------+------------------+----------+-------------------+-------------------+---------------+---------------------+----------------+------+------------+--------------+-------------+------------+----------+---------+------------+---------+---------------------------+-------------------------+-----------------------------+--------+--------+----------+---------+------------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------+---------+----------+-----------+---------+

这取决于您的需要,LUTsF7 Muxes 是 FPGA 中不同的物理单元。所以即使你不使用它,它也会在那里。

如果您有一种资源比另一种更重要,您应该尽量减少对关键资源的利用,以简化布局和布线。

如果您没有什么要紧的,我认为最好先使用 F7 Muxes,因为 Slice LUT 对其余部分更灵活你的设计。