window.location.assign(url) vs window.location = url?
window.location.assign(url) vs window.location = url?
我想知道使用一个与另一个的论据是什么。我熟悉 window.location.pathname 等其他属性。但据我所知，分配给 window.location 与调用 window.location.assign 并将其传递给 url.
具有相同的行为
为什么使用其中之一？我更喜欢 assign 因为它更明确，而分配给 window.location 在其 setter.
中具有隐含的、隐藏的魔法
是否有理由支持其中之一？
是一样的：
Whenever a new value is assigned to the location object, a document will be loaded using the URL as if location.assign() had been called with the modified URL. Note that security settings, like CORS, may prevent this to effectively happen.
(https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/location)
我想知道使用一个与另一个的论据是什么。我熟悉 window.location.pathname 等其他属性。但据我所知，分配给 window.location 与调用 window.location.assign 并将其传递给 url.
为什么使用其中之一？我更喜欢 assign 因为它更明确，而分配给 window.location 在其 setter.
是否有理由支持其中之一？
是一样的：
Whenever a new value is assigned to the location object, a document will be loaded using the URL as if location.assign() had been called with the modified URL. Note that security settings, like CORS, may prevent this to effectively happen. (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/location)