将 HOC 重构为钩子
Refactor HOC as hook
在我花在 React 和几篇文章上的时间里,我问自己如何将 HOC 重构为钩子,以及它是否有用以及为什么,
这是一个需要重构的小组件
function withSpacing(Component) {
const WrappedWithSpacing = ({
pv, ph, pt, pb, pl, pr, style, ...props
}) => {
const styleWithSpacing = {};
const spacing = layout.padding;
const paddingTop = pt || pv;
const paddingBottom = pb || pv;
const paddingRight = pr || ph;
const paddingLeft = pl || ph;
if(paddingTop > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingTop = paddingTop * spacing;
if(paddingBottom > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingBottom = paddingBottom * spacing;
if(paddingLeft > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingLeft = paddingLeft * spacing;
if(paddingRight > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingRight = paddingRight * spacing;
return <Component style={{...style, ...styleWithSpacing}} {...props} />
}
WrappedWithSpacing.propTypes = {
pv: PropTypes.number,
ph: PropTypes.number,
pt: PropTypes.number,
pb: PropTypes.number,
pl: PropTypes.number,
pr: PropTypes.number,
style: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.number, PropTypes.string]),
}
WrappedWithSpacing.defaultProps = {
pv: 0,
ph: 0,
pt: 0,
pb: 0,
pr: 0,
pl: 0,
}
return WrappedWithSpacing;
}
export default withSpacing;
根据官方文档:
Do Hooks replace render props and higher-order components?
Often, render props and higher-order components render only a single
child. We think Hooks are a simpler way to serve this use case. There
is still a place for both patterns (for example, a virtual scroller
component might have a renderItem prop, or a visual container
component might have its own DOM structure). But in most cases, Hooks
will be sufficient and can help reduce nesting in your tree.
我使用这个 HOC 只是为了向组件添加一些预定义的 space。
将其重构为钩子会更好,你能解释一下为什么吗?
如果是,将其重构为 hook 的最佳方法是什么?
TDLR; 因为你的 HOC 没有任何状态或订阅,所以没有正当理由用钩子重构你的组件。
React Hooks 引入了几个新功能来响应以补充其 class-based 对应项。 useState
补充了 this.state
(docs) as a functional way to store state between renders. useEffect
complements the componentDidMount
and componenetDidUnmount
methods (docs),它提供了一种方法来执行功能性 React 组件的设置和拆卸。
如果您从文档中获取了像这样的 HOC:
// This function takes a component...
function withSubscription(WrappedComponent, selectData) {
// ...and returns another component...
return class extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this);
this.state = {
data: selectData(DataSource, props)
};
}
componentDidMount() {
// ... that takes care of the subscription...
DataSource.addChangeListener(this.handleChange);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
DataSource.removeChangeListener(this.handleChange);
}
handleChange() {
this.setState({
data: selectData(DataSource, this.props)
});
}
render() {
// ... and renders the wrapped component with the fresh data!
// Notice that we pass through any additional props
return <WrappedComponent data={this.state.data} {...this.props} />;
}
};
}
并将其转换为功能组件,您可能会得到这样的结果:
function withSubscription(WrappedComponent, selectData) {
return function WrappedComponent (props) {
const [myData, setMyData] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
const handleMyDataChange = newData => {
setMyData(newData);
}
DataSource.addChangeListener(handleMyDataChange);
return function cleanup() {
DataSource.removeChangeListener(handleMyDataChange);
};
});
return <WrappedComponent data={data} {...this.props} />;
}
您的填充和间距在每次渲染时得到 re-generated。由于您问题中的代码在渲染之间没有任何持续存在的内容,因此尝试将其重构为实现 React Hooks 的组件没有多大意义。 React Hooks 更适合将 class-based React 组件转换为功能性 React 组件。
在我花在 React 和几篇文章上的时间里,我问自己如何将 HOC 重构为钩子,以及它是否有用以及为什么,
这是一个需要重构的小组件
function withSpacing(Component) {
const WrappedWithSpacing = ({
pv, ph, pt, pb, pl, pr, style, ...props
}) => {
const styleWithSpacing = {};
const spacing = layout.padding;
const paddingTop = pt || pv;
const paddingBottom = pb || pv;
const paddingRight = pr || ph;
const paddingLeft = pl || ph;
if(paddingTop > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingTop = paddingTop * spacing;
if(paddingBottom > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingBottom = paddingBottom * spacing;
if(paddingLeft > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingLeft = paddingLeft * spacing;
if(paddingRight > 0) styleWithSpacing.paddingRight = paddingRight * spacing;
return <Component style={{...style, ...styleWithSpacing}} {...props} />
}
WrappedWithSpacing.propTypes = {
pv: PropTypes.number,
ph: PropTypes.number,
pt: PropTypes.number,
pb: PropTypes.number,
pl: PropTypes.number,
pr: PropTypes.number,
style: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.number, PropTypes.string]),
}
WrappedWithSpacing.defaultProps = {
pv: 0,
ph: 0,
pt: 0,
pb: 0,
pr: 0,
pl: 0,
}
return WrappedWithSpacing;
}
export default withSpacing;
根据官方文档:
Do Hooks replace render props and higher-order components?
Often, render props and higher-order components render only a single child. We think Hooks are a simpler way to serve this use case. There is still a place for both patterns (for example, a virtual scroller component might have a renderItem prop, or a visual container component might have its own DOM structure). But in most cases, Hooks will be sufficient and can help reduce nesting in your tree.
我使用这个 HOC 只是为了向组件添加一些预定义的 space。
将其重构为钩子会更好,你能解释一下为什么吗?
如果是,将其重构为 hook 的最佳方法是什么?
TDLR; 因为你的 HOC 没有任何状态或订阅,所以没有正当理由用钩子重构你的组件。
React Hooks 引入了几个新功能来响应以补充其 class-based 对应项。 useState
补充了 this.state
(docs) as a functional way to store state between renders. useEffect
complements the componentDidMount
and componenetDidUnmount
methods (docs),它提供了一种方法来执行功能性 React 组件的设置和拆卸。
如果您从文档中获取了像这样的 HOC:
// This function takes a component...
function withSubscription(WrappedComponent, selectData) {
// ...and returns another component...
return class extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this);
this.state = {
data: selectData(DataSource, props)
};
}
componentDidMount() {
// ... that takes care of the subscription...
DataSource.addChangeListener(this.handleChange);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
DataSource.removeChangeListener(this.handleChange);
}
handleChange() {
this.setState({
data: selectData(DataSource, this.props)
});
}
render() {
// ... and renders the wrapped component with the fresh data!
// Notice that we pass through any additional props
return <WrappedComponent data={this.state.data} {...this.props} />;
}
};
}
并将其转换为功能组件,您可能会得到这样的结果:
function withSubscription(WrappedComponent, selectData) {
return function WrappedComponent (props) {
const [myData, setMyData] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
const handleMyDataChange = newData => {
setMyData(newData);
}
DataSource.addChangeListener(handleMyDataChange);
return function cleanup() {
DataSource.removeChangeListener(handleMyDataChange);
};
});
return <WrappedComponent data={data} {...this.props} />;
}
您的填充和间距在每次渲染时得到 re-generated。由于您问题中的代码在渲染之间没有任何持续存在的内容,因此尝试将其重构为实现 React Hooks 的组件没有多大意义。 React Hooks 更适合将 class-based React 组件转换为功能性 React 组件。