Swift Combine:如何从发布者列表中创建一个发布者?

Swift Combine: How to create a single publisher from a list of publishers?

我想使用 Apple 的新 Combine 框架从列表中的每个元素发出多个请求。然后我想要一个减少所有响应的单一结果。基本上我想从发布者列表转到拥有响应列表的单个发布者。

我试过制作一个发布商列表,但我不知道如何将该列表缩减为一个发布商。我试过制作一个包含列表的发布者,但我无法平面映射发布者列表。

请看"createIngredients"函数

func createIngredient(ingredient: Ingredient) -> AnyPublisher<CreateIngredientMutation.Data, Error> {
    return apollo.performPub(mutation: CreateIngredientMutation(name: ingredient.name, optionalProduct: ingredient.productId, quantity: ingredient.quantity, unit: ingredient.unit))
            .eraseToAnyPublisher()
}

func createIngredients(ingredients: [Ingredient]) -> AnyPublisher<[CreateIngredientMutation.Data], Error> {
    // first attempt
    let results = ingredients
            .map(createIngredient)
    // results = [AnyPublisher<CreateIngredientMutation.Data, Error>]

    // second attempt
    return Publishers.Just(ingredients)
            .eraseToAnyPublisher()
            .flatMap { (list: [Ingredient]) -> Publisher<[CreateIngredientMutation.Data], Error> in
                return list.map(createIngredient) // [AnyPublisher<CreateIngredientMutation.Data, Error>]
            }
}

我不确定如何获取发布者数组并将其转换为包含数组的发布者。

类型“[AnyPublisher]”的结果值不符合闭包结果类型'Publisher'

本质上,在您的特定情况下,您会看到类似这样的内容:

func createIngredients(ingredients: [Ingredient]) -> AnyPublisher<[CreateIngredientMutation.Data], Error> {
    Publishers.MergeMany(ingredients.map(createIngredient(ingredient:)))
        .collect()
        .eraseToAnyPublisher()
}

这 'collects' 由上游发布者生成的所有元素,并且 - 一旦它们全部完成 - 生成一个包含所有结果的数组并最终完成自身。

请记住,如果其中一个上游发布者失败——或产生多个结果——元素的数量可能与订阅者的数量不匹配,因此您可能需要额外的运营商来缓解这种情况,具体取决于您的情况。

更通用的答案,您可以使用 EntwineTest framework:

对其进行测试
import XCTest
import Combine
import EntwineTest

final class MyTests: XCTestCase {
    
    func testCreateArrayFromArrayOfPublishers() {

        typealias SimplePublisher = Just<Int>

        // we'll create our 'list of publishers' here. Each publisher emits a single
        // Int and then completes successfully – using the `Just` publisher.
        let publishers: [SimplePublisher] = [
            SimplePublisher(1),
            SimplePublisher(2),
            SimplePublisher(3),
        ]

        // we'll turn our array of publishers into a single merged publisher
        let publisherOfPublishers = Publishers.MergeMany(publishers)

        // Then we `collect` all the individual publisher elements results into
        // a single array
        let finalPublisher = publisherOfPublishers.collect()

        // Let's test what we expect to happen, will happen.
        // We'll create a scheduler to run our test on
        let testScheduler = TestScheduler()

        // Then we'll start a test. Our test will subscribe to our publisher
        // at a virtual time of 200, and cancel the subscription at 900
        let testableSubscriber = testScheduler.start { finalPublisher }

        // we're expecting that, immediately upon subscription, our results will
        // arrive. This is because we're using `just` type publishers which
        // dispatch their contents as soon as they're subscribed to
        XCTAssertEqual(testableSubscriber.recordedOutput, [
            (200, .subscription),            // we're expecting to subscribe at 200
            (200, .input([1, 2, 3])),        // then receive an array of results immediately
            (200, .completion(.finished)),   // the `collect` operator finishes immediately after completion
        ])
    }
}

我认为 Publishers.MergeMany 在这里可以提供帮助。在您的示例中,您可以像这样使用它:

func createIngredients(ingredients: [Ingredient]) -> AnyPublisher<CreateIngredientMutation.Data, Error> {
    let publishers = ingredients.map(createIngredient(ingredient:))
    return Publishers.MergeMany(publishers).eraseToAnyPublisher()
}

这将为您提供一个发布者,向您发送 Output 的单个值。

但是,如果您特别希望在所有发布者完成后立即将 Output 放入一个数组中,您可以使用 collect()MergeMany:

func createIngredients(ingredients: [Ingredient]) -> AnyPublisher<[CreateIngredientMutation.Data], Error> {
    let publishers = ingredients.map(createIngredient(ingredient:))
    return Publishers.MergeMany(publishers).collect().eraseToAnyPublisher()
}

如果您愿意,您可以将上述任何一个示例简化为一行,即:

func createIngredients(ingredients: [Ingredient]) -> AnyPublisher<CreateIngredientMutation.Data, Error> {
    Publishers.MergeMany(ingredients.map(createIngredient(ingredient:))).eraseToAnyPublisher()
}

您还可以在 Sequence 上定义自己的自定义 merge() 扩展方法,并使用它来稍微简化代码:

extension Sequence where Element: Publisher {
    func merge() -> Publishers.MergeMany<Element> {
        Publishers.MergeMany(self)
    }
}

func createIngredients(ingredients: [Ingredient]) -> AnyPublisher<CreateIngredientMutation.Data, Error> {
    ingredients.map(createIngredient).merge().eraseToAnyPublisher()
}

添加 Tricky 的答案,这是一个保留数组中元素顺序的解决方案。 它通过整个链为每个元素传递一个索引,并根据索引对收集到的数组进行排序。

由于排序,复杂度应该是 O(n log n)。

import Combine

extension Publishers {

    private struct EnumeratedElement<T> {
        let index: Int
        let element: T

        init(index: Int, element: T) {
            self.index = index
            self.element = element
        }

        init(_ enumeratedSequence: EnumeratedSequence<[T]>.Iterator.Element) {
            index = enumeratedSequence.offset
            element = enumeratedSequence.element
        }
    }

    static func mergeMappedRetainingOrder<InputType, OutputType>(
        _ inputArray: [InputType],
        mapTransform: (InputType) -> AnyPublisher<OutputType, Error>
    ) -> AnyPublisher<[OutputType], Error> {

        let enumeratedInputArray = inputArray.enumerated().map(EnumeratedElement.init)

        let enumeratedMapTransform: (EnumeratedElement<InputType>) -> AnyPublisher<EnumeratedElement<OutputType>, Error> = { enumeratedInput in
            mapTransform(enumeratedInput.element)
                .map { EnumeratedElement(index: enumeratedInput.index, element: [=10=])}
                .eraseToAnyPublisher()
        }

        let sortEnumeratedOutputArrayByIndex: ([EnumeratedElement<OutputType>]) -> [EnumeratedElement<OutputType>] = { enumeratedOutputArray in
            enumeratedOutputArray.sorted { [=10=].index < .index }
        }

        let transformToNonEnumeratedArray: ([EnumeratedElement<OutputType>]) -> [OutputType] = {
            [=10=].map { [=10=].element }
        }

        return Publishers.MergeMany(enumeratedInputArray.map(enumeratedMapTransform))
            .collect()
            .map(sortEnumeratedOutputArrayByIndex)
            .map(transformToNonEnumeratedArray)
            .eraseToAnyPublisher()
    }
}

解决方案的单元测试:

import XCTest
import Combine

final class PublishersExtensionsTests: XCTestCase {

    // MARK: - Private properties

    private var cancellables = Set<AnyCancellable>()

    // MARK: - Tests

    func test_mergeMappedRetainingOrder() {
        let expectation = expectation(description: "mergeMappedRetainingOrder publisher")

        let numbers = (1...100).map { _ in Int.random(in: 1...3) }

        let mapTransform: (Int) -> AnyPublisher<Int, Error> = {
            let delayTimeInterval = RunLoop.SchedulerTimeType.Stride(Double([=11=]))
            return Just([=11=])
                .delay(for: delayTimeInterval, scheduler: RunLoop.main)
                .setFailureType(to: Error.self)
                .eraseToAnyPublisher()
        }

        let resultNumbersPublisher = Publishers.mergeMappedRetainingOrder(numbers, mapTransform: mapTransform)

        resultNumbersPublisher.sink(receiveCompletion: { _ in }, receiveValue: { resultNumbers in
            XCTAssertTrue(numbers == resultNumbers)
            expectation.fulfill()
         }).store(in: &cancellables)

        waitForExpectations(timeout: 5)
    }
}

一行即可完成:

.flatMap(Publishers.Sequence.init(sequence:))