在 Hyperstack 上，删除方法不会更新数据库中的 has_many 关系

Question

当我在Hyperstack上的模型中使用delete方法更新has_many关系时，数据库中没有更新关联，只在前端删除关联。

我已经在 rails 5.1.7

上安装了 rails-hyperstack gem 'edge' 分支

在此代码的主要组件中，单击页面中的数字时调用 Agent#deassign(number)。

我正在尝试使用此代码中 Agent#deassign(number) 方法中的 delete 方法来删除与问题的关联。

app\hyperstack\components\main.rb

class Main < HyperComponent
  before_mount do
    @current_agent = Agent.first
  end

  render(UL) do
    @current_agent.issues.pluck(:number).each do |num|
      LI do
        num.to_s
      end
        .on(:click) do
          @current_agent.deassign(num)
        end
    end
  end
end

app\hyperstack\models\issue.rb

class Issue < ApplicationRecord
  belongs_to :agent
end

app\hyperstack\models\agent.rb

class Agent < ApplicationRecord
  has_many :issues

  def deassign(number)
    issue_to_deassign = issues.detect { |issue| issue.number == number }
    issues.delete(issue_to_deassign)
  end
end

app\db\schema.rb

...
  create_table "agents", force: :cascade do |t|
    t.string "email"
    t.datetime "created_at", null: false
    t.datetime "updated_at", null: false
  end
...
  create_table "issues", force: :cascade do |t|
    t.integer "number"
    t.integer "agent_id"
    t.datetime "created_at", null: false
    t.datetime "updated_at", null: false
    t.index ["agent_id"], name: "index_issues_on_agent_id"
  end

问题从前端的agent.issues数组中删除，页面上的数字如期消失。

但是关联没有在数据库中意外更新，当我重新加载页面时该号码重新出现。

Answer 1

不同于普通的服务器端 ActiveRecord API 你需要显式保存被删除的项目

issues.delete(issues_to_deassign).save

WHY?

The problem is that deleting an item implies a database save will occur.

Because the browser must be asynchronous with the server, Hyperstack returns a promise for any AR methods that update the database (i.e. save, update, create, etc.) The promise will then resolve when the database update completes.

However the expectation is that the delete method returns the object that was just deleted, thus we have a contradiction.

So there was 3 design choices.

1. Break how delete works, and do the save and return a promise;
2. Have delete do the save, but instead of a promise return the deleted item;
3. Have delete return the item, and let the developer do the save explicitly.

Options 1 and 2, are not good since the make the delete operation inflexible.

Option 3, while breaking the standard semantics of ActiveRecord allows those semantics to be easily implemented if desired (i.e. by adding save to the end) without sacrificing flexibility

在 Hyperstack 上，删除方法不会更新数据库中的 has_many 关系

On Hyperstack, delete method doesn't update has_many relationship in database

javascript

ruby

ruby-on-rails

reactjs

hyperstack