在什么情况下 DNS 主文件可以包含 CRLF?

In what cases can a DNS master file contain a CRLF?

在阅读 RFC 1035 Section 5.1 以编写主文件解析器时,我偶然发现了以下语句:

5.1. Format

The format of these files is a sequence of entries. Entries are predominantly line-oriented, though parentheses can be used to continue a list of items across a line boundary, and text literals can contain CRLF within the text. Any combination of tabs and spaces act as a delimiter between the separate items that make up an entry. The end of any line in the master file can end with a comment. The comment starts with a ";" (semicolon).

作者所说的“文本文字可以在文本中包含 CRLF”是什么意思?我知道下面的条目是有效的,如 Section 5.3 but I fail to find either an example of the statement or a proper definition of "text literal". I have furthermore searched the companion RFC 1034 中所述,但没有成功提及上述声明。

@   IN  SOA     VENERA      Action\.domains (
                                 20     ; SERIAL
                                 7200   ; REFRESH
                                 600    ; RETRY
                                 3600000; EXPIRE
                                 60)    ; MINIMUM

我假设文本文字可以用括号分隔。根据 RFC 1035,以下任何评论是否有效?CRLF 在文件中的有效方式有哪些?

@   IN  SOA     VENERA      Action\.domains (
                                 20     ;  Some example of a multi-line comment 
                                           inside parentheses
                                 7200
                                 600
                                 3600000
                                 60)    ;  (Some example of parentheses
                                           inside a multi-line comment)

这意味着这应该是有效的:

example.com. IN TXT "hello,
world"

RFC 作者可能期望它等同于:

example.com. IN TXT "hello,30world"

由于这种情况下行结束编码的歧义(如果平台使用LF作为行结束符,你在TXT记录中是否仍然得到CRLF?),我怀疑这是否被广泛实施。