mro、goto 和 set_subname 如何交互?
How does mro, goto, and set_subname interact?
这是一个关于 mro.pm
以及与 set_subname
和 goto
的相互作用的复杂问题
在解决问题时,我认为我误解的核心与 mro.pm
的工作原理有关——尤其是 set_subname
。
这三种结构有什么区别,
直接调用 set_subname
*Foo::bar = set_subname( 'Foo::bar', $codeRef );
Anon sub which wrapps a set_subname
*Foo::bar = sub {
my $codeRef2 = set_subname('Foo::bar', $codeRef);
goto $codeRef2
};
匿名子,其名称设置为 set_subname
*Foo::bar = set_subname(
'Foo::bar',
sub { goto $codeRef }
);
具体来说,Mojo 测试套装因这些修改中的任何一个而失败,其中匿名潜艇应用于 Mojo::Utils
's monkey_patch
运行 以上两个变体针对 t/mojo/websocket_proxy.t
,
我有第 2 个(第二个)选项
*{"${class}::$k"} = sub {
my $cr = set_subname("${class}::$k", $patch{$k});
goto $cr;
};
然后我得到
Mojo::Reactor::Poll: Timer failed: Can't locate object method "send" via package "Mojo::Transaction::HTTP" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy.t line 66.
我有第 3 个(第三个)选项,
*{"${class}::$k"} = set_subname("${class}::$k", sub { goto $patch{$k} })
然后我得到
No next::method 'new' found for Mojolicious::Routes at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28/mro.pm line 30.
显然,第一个版本有效(来自我链接的代码),问题是为什么其他两个变体给我不同的错误(尤其是第二个变体)以及那里发生的事情 - 为什么他们不这样做工作?
这确实很复杂,但也许你把它复杂化了?
请记住,MRO 只关心通过定义的包名称顺序定位一个方法,它只是代码引用的一个符号 table 条目。内部子名只与 caller() 报告 AFAIK 的内容有关。
来自:Mojo
*{"${class}::$_"} = ## symbol table entry
set_subname("${class}::$_", ## an internal name
$patch{$_}) ## for a code ref
for keys %patch;
HTH
看到错误信息后编辑:
子程序尚未有效安装。我怀疑因为在选项 2 和 3 中你将调用 set_subname() 推迟到调用时间,coderef $patch{$k} 从来没有分配给它的子名并且打破了 link在 mro::_nextcan() 的 XS 魔法链中。特别是如果 $patch{$k} 调用 next::method。不过,闭包似乎是有效的。
虽然我必须说我的测试似乎表明选项 2 是有效的。
Enter command: my ($class, $k) = qw/W S/; my %patch = (S =>
sub {print "patch here\n"; decall;}); *{"${class}::$k"} =
sub { print "goto'r here\n"; my $cr = set_subname("${class}::$k",
$patch{$k}); goto $cr;};
Enter command: decall
0 "console"
1 "console.pl"
2 "114"
3 "(eval)"
4 "0"
5 0
6 "package W; decall"
7 ""
8 "256"
9 "0[=11=]1[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0P[=11=]4[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0U5U[=11=]5"
10 0
Enter command: S
goto'r here
patch here
0 "W"
1 "(eval 110)"
2 "1"
3 "W::S"
4 "1"
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 "256"
9 "0[=11=]1[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0P[=11=]4[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0U5U[=11=]5"
10 0
您可能不得不开始寻找更远的地方来解决选项 2 的问题。
您的第二个选项无效,因为您用作包装器的子程序与内部子程序的原型不匹配。 monkey_patch
不仅用于方法,而且这改变了某些函数的解析方式。特别是,Mojo::Util::steady_time
有一个空原型,通常在不使用括号的情况下调用。
*{"${class}::$k"} = Sub::Util::set_prototype(
Sub::Util::prototype( $patch{$k} ),
Sub::Util::set_subname(
"${class}::$k",
sub {
my $cr = Sub::Util::set_subname("${class}::$k", $patch{$k});
goto $cr;
}
)
);
第三个构造不起作用,因为您正在使用 goto
从调用堆栈中删除重命名的包装子,只留下没有名称的内部子。这会破坏 next::method
找到正确方法名称的能力。
用
修改Mojo/Util.pm后
foreach my $k (keys %patch) {
*{"${class}::$k"} = sub {
my $cr = set_subname("${class}::$k", $patch{$k});
goto $cr;
};
}
并隔离测试用例,我得到:
$ perl -MCarp::Always t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t
Mojo::Reactor::Poll: Timer failed: Can't locate object method "send" via package "Mojo::Transaction::HTTP" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 59.
main::__ANON__(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), Mojo::Transaction::HTTP=HASH(0x6029ee7b0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 252
Mojo::UserAgent::_finish(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), "927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c", 1) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 220
Mojo::UserAgent::_error(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), "927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c", "Connect timeout") called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 128
Mojo::UserAgent::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop=HASH(0x601f9abb8), "Connect timeout", undef) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 63
Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15
Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598), "error", "Connect timeout") called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/Client.pm line 39
Mojo::IOLoop::Client::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143
eval {...} called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "Timer", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134
Mojo::IOLoop::start("Mojo::IOLoop") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62
at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 23.
Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "Timer failed: Can't locate object method \"send\" via package \"Mojo::Transaction::HTTP\" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 59.\x{a}\x{9}main::__ANON__(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), Mojo::Transaction::HTTP=HASH(0x6029ee7b0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 252\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_finish(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", 1) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 220\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_error(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 128\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop=HASH(0x601f9abb8), \"Connect timeout\", undef) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 63\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598), \"error\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/Client.pm line 39\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::Client::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}eval {...} called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), \"Timer\", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::start(\"Mojo::IOLoop\") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62\x{a}") called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15
Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "error", "Timer failed: Can't locate object method \"send\" via package \"Mojo::Transaction::HTTP\" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 59.\x{a}\x{9}main::__ANON__(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), Mojo::Transaction::HTTP=HASH(0x6029ee7b0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 252\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_finish(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", 1) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 220\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_error(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 128\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop=HASH(0x601f9abb8), \"Connect timeout\", undef) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 63\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598), \"error\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/Client.pm line 39\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::Client::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}eval {...} called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), \"Timer\", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::start(\"Mojo::IOLoop\") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62\x{a}") called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "Timer", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134
Mojo::IOLoop::start("Mojo::IOLoop") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62
我也可以确认设置原型修复了它。
这是一个关于 mro.pm
以及与 set_subname
和 goto
在解决问题时,我认为我误解的核心与 mro.pm
的工作原理有关——尤其是 set_subname
。
这三种结构有什么区别,
直接调用
set_subname
*Foo::bar = set_subname( 'Foo::bar', $codeRef );
Anon sub which wrapps a
set_subname
*Foo::bar = sub { my $codeRef2 = set_subname('Foo::bar', $codeRef); goto $codeRef2 };
匿名子,其名称设置为
set_subname
*Foo::bar = set_subname( 'Foo::bar', sub { goto $codeRef } );
具体来说,Mojo 测试套装因这些修改中的任何一个而失败,其中匿名潜艇应用于 Mojo::Utils
's monkey_patch
运行 以上两个变体针对 t/mojo/websocket_proxy.t
,
我有第 2 个(第二个)选项
*{"${class}::$k"} = sub { my $cr = set_subname("${class}::$k", $patch{$k}); goto $cr; };
然后我得到
Mojo::Reactor::Poll: Timer failed: Can't locate object method "send" via package "Mojo::Transaction::HTTP" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy.t line 66.
我有第 3 个(第三个)选项,
*{"${class}::$k"} = set_subname("${class}::$k", sub { goto $patch{$k} })
然后我得到
No next::method 'new' found for Mojolicious::Routes at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28/mro.pm line 30.
显然,第一个版本有效(来自我链接的代码),问题是为什么其他两个变体给我不同的错误(尤其是第二个变体)以及那里发生的事情 - 为什么他们不这样做工作?
这确实很复杂,但也许你把它复杂化了?
请记住,MRO 只关心通过定义的包名称顺序定位一个方法,它只是代码引用的一个符号 table 条目。内部子名只与 caller() 报告 AFAIK 的内容有关。
来自:Mojo
*{"${class}::$_"} = ## symbol table entry
set_subname("${class}::$_", ## an internal name
$patch{$_}) ## for a code ref
for keys %patch;
HTH
看到错误信息后编辑:
子程序尚未有效安装。我怀疑因为在选项 2 和 3 中你将调用 set_subname() 推迟到调用时间,coderef $patch{$k} 从来没有分配给它的子名并且打破了 link在 mro::_nextcan() 的 XS 魔法链中。特别是如果 $patch{$k} 调用 next::method。不过,闭包似乎是有效的。
虽然我必须说我的测试似乎表明选项 2 是有效的。
Enter command: my ($class, $k) = qw/W S/; my %patch = (S =>
sub {print "patch here\n"; decall;}); *{"${class}::$k"} =
sub { print "goto'r here\n"; my $cr = set_subname("${class}::$k",
$patch{$k}); goto $cr;};
Enter command: decall
0 "console"
1 "console.pl"
2 "114"
3 "(eval)"
4 "0"
5 0
6 "package W; decall"
7 ""
8 "256"
9 "0[=11=]1[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0P[=11=]4[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0U5U[=11=]5"
10 0
Enter command: S
goto'r here
patch here
0 "W"
1 "(eval 110)"
2 "1"
3 "W::S"
4 "1"
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 "256"
9 "0[=11=]1[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0P[=11=]4[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0[=11=]0U5U[=11=]5"
10 0
您可能不得不开始寻找更远的地方来解决选项 2 的问题。
您的第二个选项无效,因为您用作包装器的子程序与内部子程序的原型不匹配。 monkey_patch
不仅用于方法,而且这改变了某些函数的解析方式。特别是,Mojo::Util::steady_time
有一个空原型,通常在不使用括号的情况下调用。
*{"${class}::$k"} = Sub::Util::set_prototype(
Sub::Util::prototype( $patch{$k} ),
Sub::Util::set_subname(
"${class}::$k",
sub {
my $cr = Sub::Util::set_subname("${class}::$k", $patch{$k});
goto $cr;
}
)
);
第三个构造不起作用,因为您正在使用 goto
从调用堆栈中删除重命名的包装子,只留下没有名称的内部子。这会破坏 next::method
找到正确方法名称的能力。
用
修改Mojo/Util.pm后 foreach my $k (keys %patch) {
*{"${class}::$k"} = sub {
my $cr = set_subname("${class}::$k", $patch{$k});
goto $cr;
};
}
并隔离测试用例,我得到:
$ perl -MCarp::Always t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t
Mojo::Reactor::Poll: Timer failed: Can't locate object method "send" via package "Mojo::Transaction::HTTP" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 59.
main::__ANON__(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), Mojo::Transaction::HTTP=HASH(0x6029ee7b0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 252
Mojo::UserAgent::_finish(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), "927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c", 1) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 220
Mojo::UserAgent::_error(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), "927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c", "Connect timeout") called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 128
Mojo::UserAgent::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop=HASH(0x601f9abb8), "Connect timeout", undef) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 63
Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15
Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598), "error", "Connect timeout") called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/Client.pm line 39
Mojo::IOLoop::Client::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143
eval {...} called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "Timer", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134
Mojo::IOLoop::start("Mojo::IOLoop") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62
at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 23.
Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "Timer failed: Can't locate object method \"send\" via package \"Mojo::Transaction::HTTP\" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 59.\x{a}\x{9}main::__ANON__(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), Mojo::Transaction::HTTP=HASH(0x6029ee7b0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 252\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_finish(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", 1) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 220\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_error(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 128\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop=HASH(0x601f9abb8), \"Connect timeout\", undef) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 63\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598), \"error\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/Client.pm line 39\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::Client::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}eval {...} called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), \"Timer\", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::start(\"Mojo::IOLoop\") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62\x{a}") called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15
Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "error", "Timer failed: Can't locate object method \"send\" via package \"Mojo::Transaction::HTTP\" at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 59.\x{a}\x{9}main::__ANON__(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), Mojo::Transaction::HTTP=HASH(0x6029ee7b0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 252\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_finish(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", 1) called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 220\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::_error(Mojo::UserAgent=HASH(0x60280dad0), \"927210c53042c6142eda3f4010c8b17c\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/UserAgent.pm line 128\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::UserAgent::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop=HASH(0x601f9abb8), \"Connect timeout\", undef) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 63\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/EventEmitter.pm line 15\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::EventEmitter::emit(Mojo::IOLoop::Client=HASH(0x601e34598), \"error\", \"Connect timeout\") called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/Client.pm line 39\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::Client::__ANON__(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}eval {...} called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), \"Timer\", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134\x{a}\x{9}Mojo::IOLoop::start(\"Mojo::IOLoop\") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62\x{a}") called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 143
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::_try(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390), "Timer", CODE(0x601e24ca0)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 81
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::one_tick(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/Reactor/Poll.pm line 99
Mojo::Reactor::Poll::start(Mojo::Reactor::Poll=HASH(0x6001a8390)) called at blib/lib/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 134
Mojo::IOLoop::start("Mojo::IOLoop") called at t/mojo/websocket_proxy2.t line 62
我也可以确认设置原型修复了它。