"community forks" 和 github 中的 "personal-use forks" 有什么区别？
What is difference between "community forks" and "personal-use forks" in github?
我想回答这个问题：如何区分任何 VCS 中的社区分叉和个人使用的分叉。首先我应该知道：
"community forks" 和 github 中的 "personal-use forks" 有什么区别？
这是关于“MSR 2020 MC: MSR 2020 Mining Challenge”
Cross-repository analysis: How can forking and duplication patterns inform us on software health and risks?
How can community forks be distinguished from personal-use forks? What are good predictors of the success of a community fork?
您可以在 getferdi/ferdi: a duplication of another repository, now maintained by a large community (53 contributors, no, wait... 75 contributors in mid-2020)
中查看社区分叉的示例
这些不是实际的 GitHub forks。
他们复制了另一个 repo 并对其进行了修改，无意通过 pull request 做出贡献。
另一个例子：fomantic/Fomantic-UI, which duplicates Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI.
Fomantic was created to continue active development of Semantic-UI and has the intent to be merged back into the master repository once active development can restart.
个人使用的分叉是经典 GitHub fork，由一个人分叉。
我想回答这个问题：如何区分任何 VCS 中的社区分叉和个人使用的分叉。首先我应该知道：
"community forks" 和 github 中的 "personal-use forks" 有什么区别？
这是关于“MSR 2020 MC: MSR 2020 Mining Challenge”
Cross-repository analysis: How can forking and duplication patterns inform us on software health and risks?
How can community forks be distinguished from personal-use forks? What are good predictors of the success of a community fork?
您可以在 getferdi/ferdi: a duplication of another repository, now maintained by a large community (53 contributors, no, wait... 75 contributors in mid-2020)
这些不是实际的 GitHub forks。
他们复制了另一个 repo 并对其进行了修改，无意通过 pull request 做出贡献。
另一个例子：fomantic/Fomantic-UI, which duplicates Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI.
Fomantic was created to continue active development of Semantic-UI and has the intent to be merged back into the master repository once active development can restart.
个人使用的分叉是经典 GitHub fork，由一个人分叉。