Borwein 在 Fortran 中计算 Pi 的算法收敛太快
Borwein’s algorithm for the calculation of Pi in Fortran is converging too fast
在 Fortran 中使用四次收敛的 Borwein’s algorithm 的以下实现诚然可以计算 Pi,但收敛得太快了。理论上,a
四次收敛于 1/π。因此,在每次迭代中,正确数字的数量增加了四倍。
! pi.f90
program main
use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only: real128
implicit none
real(kind=real128), parameter :: CONST_PI = acos(-1._real128)
real(kind=real128) :: pi
integer :: i
do i = 1, 10
pi = borwein(i)
print '("Pi (n = ", i3, "): ", f0.100)', i, pi
end do
print '("Pi:", 11x, f0.100)', CONST_PI
contains
function borwein(n) result(pi)
integer, intent(in) :: n
real(kind=real128) :: pi
real(kind=real128) :: a, y
integer :: i
y = sqrt(2._real128) - 1
a = 2 * (sqrt(2._real128) - 1)**2
do i = 1, n
y = (1 - (1 - y**4)**.25_real128) / (1 + (1 - y**4)**.25_real128)
a = a * (1 + y)**4 - 2**(2 * (i - 1) + 3) * y * (1 + y + y**2)
end do
pi = 1 / a
end function borwein
end program main
但是在第二次迭代之后,Pi 的值不再改变,正如前 100 位数字所见:
$ gfortran -o pi pi.f90
$ ./pi
Pi (n = 1): 3.1415926462135422821493444319826910539597974491424025615960346875056357837663334464650688460096716881
Pi (n = 2): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 3): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 4): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 5): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 6): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 7): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 8): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 9): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 10): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795027974790680981372955730045043318742967186629755360627314075827598572
(最后输出的是Pi的正确值,用于比较。)
执行中是否有错误?我不确定,是否始终保持 real128
精度。
在第二次迭代中,您已经收敛到 real128 可以支持的位数:
ian@eris:~/work/stack$ cat pi2.f90
Program pi2
Use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only: real128
Implicit None
Real( real128 ) :: pi
pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439_real128
Write( *, '( f0.100 )' ) pi
Write( *, '( f0.100 )' ) Nearest( pi, +1.0_real128 )
Write( *, '( f0.100 )' ) Abs( acos(-1._real128) - Nearest( pi, +1.0_real128 ) )
End Program pi2
ian@eris:~/work/stack$ gfortran -std=f2008 -Wall -Wextra -fcheck=all pi2.f90
ian@eris:~/work/stack$ ./a.out
3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
3.1415926535897932384626433832795027974790680981372955730045043318742967186629755360627314075827598572
.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
ian@eris:~/work/stack$
因此,进一步的迭代显示没有变化,因为它已经尽可能准确
在 Fortran 中使用四次收敛的 Borwein’s algorithm 的以下实现诚然可以计算 Pi,但收敛得太快了。理论上,a
四次收敛于 1/π。因此,在每次迭代中,正确数字的数量增加了四倍。
! pi.f90
program main
use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only: real128
implicit none
real(kind=real128), parameter :: CONST_PI = acos(-1._real128)
real(kind=real128) :: pi
integer :: i
do i = 1, 10
pi = borwein(i)
print '("Pi (n = ", i3, "): ", f0.100)', i, pi
end do
print '("Pi:", 11x, f0.100)', CONST_PI
contains
function borwein(n) result(pi)
integer, intent(in) :: n
real(kind=real128) :: pi
real(kind=real128) :: a, y
integer :: i
y = sqrt(2._real128) - 1
a = 2 * (sqrt(2._real128) - 1)**2
do i = 1, n
y = (1 - (1 - y**4)**.25_real128) / (1 + (1 - y**4)**.25_real128)
a = a * (1 + y)**4 - 2**(2 * (i - 1) + 3) * y * (1 + y + y**2)
end do
pi = 1 / a
end function borwein
end program main
但是在第二次迭代之后,Pi 的值不再改变,正如前 100 位数字所见:
$ gfortran -o pi pi.f90
$ ./pi
Pi (n = 1): 3.1415926462135422821493444319826910539597974491424025615960346875056357837663334464650688460096716881
Pi (n = 2): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 3): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 4): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 5): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 6): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 7): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 8): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 9): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi (n = 10): 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
Pi: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795027974790680981372955730045043318742967186629755360627314075827598572
(最后输出的是Pi的正确值,用于比较。)
执行中是否有错误?我不确定,是否始终保持 real128
精度。
在第二次迭代中,您已经收敛到 real128 可以支持的位数:
ian@eris:~/work/stack$ cat pi2.f90
Program pi2
Use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only: real128
Implicit None
Real( real128 ) :: pi
pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439_real128
Write( *, '( f0.100 )' ) pi
Write( *, '( f0.100 )' ) Nearest( pi, +1.0_real128 )
Write( *, '( f0.100 )' ) Abs( acos(-1._real128) - Nearest( pi, +1.0_real128 ) )
End Program pi2
ian@eris:~/work/stack$ gfortran -std=f2008 -Wall -Wextra -fcheck=all pi2.f90
ian@eris:~/work/stack$ ./a.out
3.1415926535897932384626433832795024122930792206901249618089158148888330110426458929850923595950007439
3.1415926535897932384626433832795027974790680981372955730045043318742967186629755360627314075827598572
.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
ian@eris:~/work/stack$
因此,进一步的迭代显示没有变化,因为它已经尽可能准确