我应该在参考网站中使用 nofollow 链接吗？
Should I be using nofollow links in reference website?
所以我不久前制作了一个关于制作网站时应遵循的步骤的指南，它几乎是一个页面，其中包含大量关于 do/get 某些事情的参考资料。我现在才开始阅读诸如 nofollow 链接之类的内容，但我不确定它们是否适用。
所有链接都与网络开发相关，因此与网站本身相关。
有一节提供了一些不错的网站示例，但不太适用。我应该为这一部分使用 nofollow 链接，还是为本网站上的所有链接使用 nofollow 链接？我不太确定在这种情况下我应该做什么。
我现在提到这个是因为其中一个网站的网站管理员实际上找到我说他们因指向他们网站的无效链接而受到 Google 的惩罚。是我的原因吗？还是不相关？
I mention this now as a webmaster for one of these websites actually approached me saying they were penalised by Google due to invalid links through to their site.
首先，该网站管理员没有证据表明这是因为您链接到了他们的网站。良好的链接对每个人都是一件好事。如果您没有到处创建垃圾链接，则无需担心。
其次，该网站管理员可以通过 Google 拒绝任何指向他们网站的链接。
Should I be using nofollow links in reference website?
没有。绝对不。您有一个完全合法的站点，并且您正在链接到完全合法的其他站点。不要理会这些，让链接成为。
Here's what Google says about it:
Here are some cases in which you might want to consider using nofollow:
Untrusted content: If you can't or don't want to vouch for the content of pages you link to from your site — for example, untrusted user comments or guestbook entries — you should nofollow those links. This can discourage spammers from targeting your site, and will help keep your site from inadvertently passing PageRank to bad neighborhoods on the web. In particular, comment spammers may decide not to target a specific content management system or blog service if they can see that untrusted links in that service are nofollowed. If you want to recognize and reward trustworthy contributors, you could decide to automatically or manually remove the nofollow attribute on links posted by members or users who have consistently made high-quality contributions over time.
Paid links: A site's ranking in Google search results is partly based on analysis of those sites that link to it. In order to prevent paid links from influencing search results and negatively impacting users, we urge webmasters use nofollow on such links. Search engine guidelines require machine-readable disclosure of paid links in the same way that consumers online and offline appreciate disclosure of paid relationships (for example, a full-page newspaper ad may be headed by the word "Advertisement"). More information on Google's stance on paid links.
Crawl prioritization: Search engine robots can't sign in or register as a member on your forum, so there's no reason to invite Googlebot to follow "register here" or "sign in" links. Using nofollow on these links enables Googlebot to crawl other pages you'd prefer to see in Google's index. However, a solid information architecture — intuitive navigation, user- and search-engine-friendly URLs, and so on — is likely to be a far more productive use of resources than focusing on crawl prioritization via nofollowed links.
所以我不久前制作了一个关于制作网站时应遵循的步骤的指南，它几乎是一个页面，其中包含大量关于 do/get 某些事情的参考资料。我现在才开始阅读诸如 nofollow 链接之类的内容，但我不确定它们是否适用。
所有链接都与网络开发相关，因此与网站本身相关。
有一节提供了一些不错的网站示例，但不太适用。我应该为这一部分使用 nofollow 链接，还是为本网站上的所有链接使用 nofollow 链接？我不太确定在这种情况下我应该做什么。
我现在提到这个是因为其中一个网站的网站管理员实际上找到我说他们因指向他们网站的无效链接而受到 Google 的惩罚。是我的原因吗？还是不相关？
I mention this now as a webmaster for one of these websites actually approached me saying they were penalised by Google due to invalid links through to their site.
首先，该网站管理员没有证据表明这是因为您链接到了他们的网站。良好的链接对每个人都是一件好事。如果您没有到处创建垃圾链接，则无需担心。
其次，该网站管理员可以通过 Google 拒绝任何指向他们网站的链接。
Should I be using nofollow links in reference website?
没有。绝对不。您有一个完全合法的站点，并且您正在链接到完全合法的其他站点。不要理会这些，让链接成为。
Here's what Google says about it:
Here are some cases in which you might want to consider using nofollow:
Untrusted content: If you can't or don't want to vouch for the content of pages you link to from your site — for example, untrusted user comments or guestbook entries — you should nofollow those links. This can discourage spammers from targeting your site, and will help keep your site from inadvertently passing PageRank to bad neighborhoods on the web. In particular, comment spammers may decide not to target a specific content management system or blog service if they can see that untrusted links in that service are nofollowed. If you want to recognize and reward trustworthy contributors, you could decide to automatically or manually remove the nofollow attribute on links posted by members or users who have consistently made high-quality contributions over time.
Paid links: A site's ranking in Google search results is partly based on analysis of those sites that link to it. In order to prevent paid links from influencing search results and negatively impacting users, we urge webmasters use nofollow on such links. Search engine guidelines require machine-readable disclosure of paid links in the same way that consumers online and offline appreciate disclosure of paid relationships (for example, a full-page newspaper ad may be headed by the word "Advertisement"). More information on Google's stance on paid links.
Crawl prioritization: Search engine robots can't sign in or register as a member on your forum, so there's no reason to invite Googlebot to follow "register here" or "sign in" links. Using nofollow on these links enables Googlebot to crawl other pages you'd prefer to see in Google's index. However, a solid information architecture — intuitive navigation, user- and search-engine-friendly URLs, and so on — is likely to be a far more productive use of resources than focusing on crawl prioritization via nofollowed links.