弹性搜索路口查询

Question

我想获取按总数排序的用户列表的常用词。

示例：我有一个用户使用的单词索引。

文档：

[
  {
    user_id: 1,
    word: 'food',
    count: 2
  },
  {
    user_id: 1,
    word: 'thor',
    count: 1
  },
  {
    user_id: 1,
    word: 'beer',
    count: 7
  },
  {
    user_id: 2,
    word: 'summer',
    count: 12
  },
  {
    user_id: 2,
    word: 'thor',
    count: 4
  },
  {
    user_id: 1,
    word: 'beer',
    count: 2
  },
  ..otheruserdetails..
]

输入：user_ids: [1, 2]

期望的输出：

[
  {
    'word': 'beer',
    'total_count': 9
  },
  {
    'word': 'thor',
    'total_count': 5
  }
]

我目前拥有的：

使用 user_id 列表中的 user_id 获取所有文档（bool 应该查询）
在应用层处理文档。
- 遍历每个关键字
  - 检查每个关键字是否存在 user_id
  - 如果是，求计数
  - 否则，处理并转到下一个关键字

但是，这是不可行的，因为 word 文档会变得越来越大，而应用程序层将无法跟上。有什么方法可以将其移动到 ES 查询？

Answer 1

您可以使用Terms aggregation and Value Count aggregation

可以将 "Terms aggregation" 视为 "Group By"。输出将给出一个唯一的用户 ID 列表、用户下所有单词的列表以及每个单词的最终计数

{
  "from": 0, 
  "size": 10, 
  "query": {
    "terms": {
      "user_id": [
        "1",
        "2"
      ]
    }
  },
  "aggs": {
    "users": {
      "terms": {
        "field": "user_id",
        "size": 10
      },
      "aggs": {
        "words": {
          "terms": {
            "field": "word.keyword",
            "size": 10
          },
          "aggs": {
            "word_count": {
              "value_count": {
                "field": "word.keyword"
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

结果

    "hits" : [
      {
        "_index" : "index89",
        "_type" : "_doc",
        "_id" : "gFRzr3ABAWOsYG7t2tpt",
        "_score" : 1.0,
        "_source" : {
          "user_id" : 1,
          "word" : "thor",
          "count" : 1
        }
      },
      {
        "_index" : "index89",
        "_type" : "_doc",
        "_id" : "flRzr3ABAWOsYG7t0dqI",
        "_score" : 1.0,
        "_source" : {
          "user_id" : 1,
          "word" : "food",
          "count" : 2
        }
      },
      {
        "_index" : "index89",
        "_type" : "_doc",
        "_id" : "f1Rzr3ABAWOsYG7t19ps",
        "_score" : 1.0,
        "_source" : {
          "user_id" : 2,
          "word" : "thor",
          "count" : 4
        }
      },
      {
        "_index" : "index89",
        "_type" : "_doc",
        "_id" : "gVRzr3ABAWOsYG7t8NrR",
        "_score" : 1.0,
        "_source" : {
          "user_id" : 1,
          "word" : "food",
          "count" : 2
        }
      },
      {
        "_index" : "index89",
        "_type" : "_doc",
        "_id" : "glRzr3ABAWOsYG7t-Npj",
        "_score" : 1.0,
        "_source" : {
          "user_id" : 1,
          "word" : "thor",
          "count" : 1
        }
      },
      {
        "_index" : "index89",
        "_type" : "_doc",
        "_id" : "g1Rzr3ABAWOsYG7t_9po",
        "_score" : 1.0,
        "_source" : {
          "user_id" : 2,
          "word" : "thor",
          "count" : 4
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "aggregations" : {
    "users" : {
      "doc_count_error_upper_bound" : 0,
      "sum_other_doc_count" : 0,
      "buckets" : [
        {
          "key" : 1,
          "doc_count" : 4,
          "words" : {
            "doc_count_error_upper_bound" : 0,
            "sum_other_doc_count" : 0,
            "buckets" : [
              {
                "key" : "food",
                "doc_count" : 2,
                "word_count" : {
                  "value" : 2
                }
              },
              {
                "key" : "thor",
                "doc_count" : 2,
                "word_count" : {
                  "value" : 2
                }
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        {
          "key" : 2,
          "doc_count" : 2,
          "words" : {
            "doc_count_error_upper_bound" : 0,
            "sum_other_doc_count" : 0,
            "buckets" : [
              {
                "key" : "thor",
                "doc_count" : 2,
                "word_count" : {
                  "value" : 2
                }
              }
            ]
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  }

Answer 2

您可以像下面这样为用户使用聚合和过滤器：

{
  "size": 0,
  "aggs": {
    "words_stats": {
      "filter": {
        "terms": {
          "user_id": [
            "1",
            "2"
          ]
        }
      }, 
      "aggs": {
        "words": {
          "terms": {
            "field": "word.keyword"
          },
          "aggs": {
            "total_count": {
              "sum": {
                "field": "count"
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

结果将是：

{
  "key" : "beer",
  "doc_count" : 2,
  "total_count" : {
    "value" : 9.0
  }
},
{
  "key" : "thor",
  "doc_count" : 2,
  "total_count" : {
    "value" : 5.0
  }
},
{
  "key" : "food",
  "doc_count" : 1,
  "total_count" : {
    "value" : 2.0
  }
},
{
  "key" : "summer",
  "doc_count" : 1,
  "total_count" : {
    "value" : 12.0
 }
}

Answer 3

这是我必须做的：

我参考了@Rakesh Chandru 和@jaspreet chahal 的回答'并想出了这个。此查询处理 intersection 和 sorting.

进程：

过滤 user_ids
group_by(terms aggs) 关键字（示例中的单词），
通过聚合（总和）计数排序

{
    size: 0, // because we do not want result of filtered records
    query: {
        terms: { user_id: user_ids } // filter by user_ids
    },
    aggs: {
        group_by_keyword: {
            terms: {
                field: "keyword", // group by keyword
                min_doc_count: 2, // where count >= 2
                order: { agg_count: "desc" }, // order by count
                size
            },
            aggs: { 
                agg_count: {
                    sum: {
                        field: "count" // aggregating count
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

弹性搜索路口查询

Elastic Search Intersection Query

elasticsearch

elasticsearch-query

elasticsearch-aggregation