LibClang clang_getArgType() returns 类型错误

LibClang clang_getArgType() returns wrong type

我尝试使用 libClang 解析 C++ 方法,但在尝试获取函数的 parameters/arguments 时,有时会给出错误的类型。

示例:

我有两种不同的方法

std::string Method::exportMethod(std::map<std::string, std::string> &defines) const

std::string Field::exportField(std::map<std::string, std::string> &defines) const

然后我用

打印 AST(用于调试目的)
CXChildVisitResult printer::printVisitor(CXCursor c, CXCursor parent, CXClientData clientData) {
    recursivePrintData data = *static_cast<recursivePrintData *>(clientData);

    *(data.stream) <<
                   data.indent <<
                   clang_getCursorKindSpelling(clang_getCursorKind(c)) <<
                   "; name: " << clang_getCursorSpelling(c) <<
                   ", type: " << clang_getCursorType(c) <<
                   ", arg0Type: " << clang_getArgType(clang_getCursorType(c), 0) <<
                   std::endl;

    recursivePrintData newDat(data);
    data.indent += "    ";

    clang_visitChildren(c, printVisitor, (void *) &data);

    return CXChildVisit_Recurse;
}

(recursivePrintData 是一个包含输出流和当前缩进级别的结构)

对于这两种方法,输出如下:

导出方法:

    CXXMethod; name: exportMethod, type: std::string (int &) const, arg0Type: int &
        NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
        TypeRef; name: std::string, type: std::string, arg0Type: 
        ParmDecl; name: defines, type: int &, arg0Type: 

导出字段:

CXXMethod; name: exportField, type: std::string (std::map<std::string, std::string> &) const, arg0Type: std::map<std::string, std::string> &
        NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
        TypeRef; name: std::string, type: std::string, arg0Type: 
        ParmDecl; name: defines, type: std::map<std::string, std::string> &, arg0Type: 
            NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
            TemplateRef; name: map, type: , arg0Type: 
            NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
            TypeRef; name: std::string, type: std::string, arg0Type: 
            NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
            TypeRef; name: std::string, type: std::string, arg0Type: 
        NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
        TemplateRef; name: map, type: , arg0Type: 
        NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
        TypeRef; name: std::string, type: std::string, arg0Type: 
        NamespaceRef; name: std, type: , arg0Type: 
        TypeRef; name: std::string, type: std::string, arg0Type: 

尽管这两个方法本质上是相同的(除了名称之外),但它错误地将第一个方法的参数检测为整数引用,而它正确地处理了第二个方法。可能是什么原因造成的?

我知道这个问题已经有 9 个月了,但万一其他人偶然发现了这个问题……我也为此苦苦挣扎,直到我意识到我错过了 libclang 发出的诊断消息。 clang 中所有内容的默认类型是 int,因此如果您对 clang_parseTranslationUnit 的调用缺少包含路径或其他原因失败(但不是致命失败),则已解析(但未定义)的类型默认为int。要解决此问题:解析翻译单元后,调用这样的函数(警告可能没问题,这取决于您):

oid printDiagnostics(CXTranslationUnit translationUnit){
    int nbDiag = clang_getNumDiagnostics(translationUnit);
    printf("There are %i diagnostics:\n",nbDiag);

    bool foundError = false;
    for (unsigned int currentDiag = 0; currentDiag < nbDiag; ++currentDiag) {
        CXDiagnostic diagnotic = clang_getDiagnostic(translationUnit, currentDiag);
        CXString errorString = clang_formatDiagnostic(diagnotic,clang_defaultDiagnosticDisplayOptions());
        std::string tmp{clang_getCString(errorString)};
        clang_disposeString(errorString);
        if (tmp.find("error:") != std::string::npos) {
            foundError = true;
        }
        std::cerr << tmp << std::endl;
    }
    if (foundError) {
        std::cerr << "Please resolve these issues and try again." <<std::endl;
        exit(-1);
    }
}