给定一个确保防止在 class 参数中错误分配值的单元测试，如何编写一个考虑到这一点的方法？

Question

我最近了解到测试驱动开发。但是，我很难理解它。给出了以下单元测试：

public void Setup()
{
    invoicePosition = new InvoicePosition{
        Customer = new Customer(),
        ItemIdentifier = 0,
        ItemName = "SpringRoll",
        Orders = 2,
        SingleUnitPrice = 3.50m
    };

    pairs = new KeywordPair[]{
        new KeywordPair(new Keyword("ItemNumber"),invoicePosition.ItemIdentifier.ToString()),
        new KeywordPair(new Keyword("ItemName"), invoicePosition.ItemName),
        new KeywordPair(new Keyword("CustomerName"), invoicePosition.Customer.Name),
        new KeywordPair(new Keyword("AmountOrdered"), invoicePosition.Orders.ToString()),
        new KeywordPair(new Keyword("NetPrice"), invoicePosition.SingleUnitPrice.ToString())
    };
}

[Test]
public void Invoice_CreateOrderOrderedInput_Valid(){
    var invoice = InvoicePosition.CreateFromPairs(pairs);
    Assert.AreEqual(invoicePosition.ItemIdentifier, invoice.ItemIdentifier);
    Assert.AreEqual(invoicePosition.ItemName.GetType(), invoice.ItemName.GetType());
    Assert.AreEqual(invoicePosition.Customer.Name, invoice.Customer.Name);
    Assert.AreEqual(invoicePosition.Orders, invoice.Orders);
    Assert.AreEqual(invoicePosition.SingleUnitPrice, invoice.SingleUnitPrice);
}

请注意关键字和关键字结构如下：

public struct Keyword
{
        private string keyword;
        private KeywordTypes type;

        public Keyword(string keyword, KeywordTypes Type = KeywordTypes.String){
            this.keyword = keyword;
            this.type = Type;
}

public struct KeywordPair
{
        public Keyword Key;
        public string Value;

        public KeywordPair(Keyword key, string value)
        {
            this.Key = key;
            this.Value = value;
        }
}

现在我已经为之前的单元测试编写了以下项目：命名空间 SimpleShop

    public class InvoicePosition
    {
        public uint ItemIdentifier = 0;
        public string ItemName = "";
        public uint Orders = 0;
        public decimal SingleUnitPrice = 0.0m;
        public Customer Customer;
        public KeywordPair[] Pairs = new KeywordPair[0];

        public static InvoicePosition CreateFromPairs(KeywordPair[] pairs)
        {
            var invoice = new InvoicePosition();
            invoice.Pairs = pairs;
            return invoice;
        }          
    }

我需要编写代码来解释错误的序列化。例如，如果将 pairs 引入到程序中会怎样：

pairs[3] = new KeywordPair(new Keyword("AmountOrdered"), "+%&/" + invoicePosition.Orders.ToString());
pairs[4] = new KeywordPair(new Keyword("NetPrice"), invoicePosition.SingleUnitPrice.ToString() + 
"%&öä/");

谢谢，任何帮助都会很棒。

Answer 1

鉴于测试 Invoice_CreateOrderOrderedInput_Valid，OP 中建议的 InvoicePosition 未通过测试 。通过使用 Visual Studio 的各种重构工具，像这样的东西是 可能可行的最简单的东西：

public class InvoicePosition
{
    public Customer Customer { get; set; }
    public int ItemIdentifier { get; set; }
    public string ItemName { get; set; }
    public int Orders { get; set; }
    public decimal SingleUnitPrice { get; set; }

    public static InvoicePosition CreateFromPairs(KeywordPair[] pairs)
    {
        return new InvoicePosition
        {
            ItemName = "",
            Customer = new Customer(),
            Orders = 2,
            SingleUnitPrice = 3.5m
        };
    }
}

CreateFromPairs 实现显然不是完整或正确的实现，但它通过了所有测试。 TDD 的挑战是弄清楚接下来要编写哪个测试。

如果你能以尽可能小的步骤前进，TDD 效果最好。您可能要考虑 Transformation Priority Premise。您首先要解决错误实施的哪一部分？

也许您对 ItemName 被硬编码为空字符串感到不满。您如何编写一个新的测试来鼓励您使实现更通用？

我会编写另一个测试，使第一个测试中的所有内容保持不变，除了 ItemName 值。

测试的当前结构方式及其庞大的 Setup 方法使得这很不方便。我建议您改写 parametrised tests。

给定一个确保防止在 class 参数中错误分配值的单元测试，如何编写一个考虑到这一点的方法？

given a unit test that make sure that prevent wrong-assigned values in a class argument, how to write a method that takes that into account?

c#

unit-testing

tdd