错误 wrap/unwrap && 使用 errors.Is() 进行类型检查
Error wrap/unwrap && type checking with errors.Is()
我正在检查 Go v1.13 Go v1.14 中的错误跟踪。为什么用errors.Is()
只能找到没有参数或有值接收者的错误实现?这意味着能够包装的错误实现必须有一个值接收器,以便能够通过 errors.Is()
.
找到
package main
import (
"fmt"
"errors"
)
type someAtomicError struct {}
func (e *someAtomicError) Error() string { return "Hi!" }
func checkAtomicError() {
e := &someAtomicError{}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
e2IsE := errors.Is(e2, &someAtomicError{})
fmt.Println("atomic error trace ---\t\t", e2, "\t\t--- is traceable: ", e2IsE)
}
type someWrapperError struct {
Msg string
Err error
}
func (e someWrapperError) Error() string { return fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v", e.Msg, e.Err) }
func (e someWrapperError) Unwrap() error { return e.Err }
func checkWrapperError() {
e := someWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
e2IsE := errors.Is(e2, someWrapperError{"Hi!", nil})
fmt.Println("wrapper error trace ---\t\t", e2, "\t--- is traceable: ", e2IsE)
}
type somePointerWrapperError struct {
Msg string
Err error
}
func (e *somePointerWrapperError) Error() string { return fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v", e.Msg, e.Err) }
func (e *somePointerWrapperError) Unwrap() error { return e.Err }
func checkPointerWrapperError() {
e := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
e2IsE := errors.Is(e2, &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil})
fmt.Println("pointer wrapper error trace ---\t", e2, "\t--- is traceable: ", e2IsE)
}
func main() {
checkAtomicError()
checkWrapperError()
checkPointerWrapperError()
}
//atomic error trace --- whoa!: Hi! --- is traceable: true
//wrapper error trace --- whoa!: Hi!: <nil> --- is traceable: true
//pointer wrapper error trace --- whoa!: Hi!: <nil> --- is traceable: false
https://play.golang.org/p/-hSukZ-gii2
似乎参数中的任何差异,包括包装错误参数 Err
中的差异,都会导致无法使用 errors.Is()
找到类型。
您在尝试通过 errors.Is
在另一个错误中查找一个错误时得到 false
的原因是 - 虽然这两个错误可能具有相同的字段值 - 它们是两个不同的内存指针:
e := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil} // e2 != e
ew := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
errors.Is(ew, e) // true
errors.Is(ew, e2) // false - because `ew` wraps `e` not `e2`
那么如何检测这种“类型”的错误 和 得到它的值:使用 errors.As
代替:
e := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
var ev *somePointerWrapperError
if errors.As(e2, &ev) {
fmt.Printf("%#v\n", ev) // &somePointerWrapperError{Msg:"Hi!", Err:error(nil)}
}
远程相关,但也许对某人有帮助:我花了一些时间才意识到 errors.As(...)
实际上需要指向目标的双指针,而 errors.Is(...)
不需要:
var _ error = (*CustomError)(nil) // ensure CustomError implements error
type CustomError struct {
msg string
}
func (e CustomError) Error() string {
return e.msg
}
func main() {
err := &CustomError{"Hello, world!"} // Methods return pointers to errors, allowing them to be nil
var eval *CustomError
as := errors.As(err, &eval) // yes, that's **CustomError
asFaulty := errors.As(err, eval) // no compile error, so it wrongly seems okay
is := errors.Is(err, eval) // that's just *CustomError
fmt.Printf("as: %t, asFaulty: %t, is: %t", as, asFaulty, is) // as: true, asFaulty: false, is: true
}
我正在检查 Go v1.13 Go v1.14 中的错误跟踪。为什么用errors.Is()
只能找到没有参数或有值接收者的错误实现?这意味着能够包装的错误实现必须有一个值接收器,以便能够通过 errors.Is()
.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"errors"
)
type someAtomicError struct {}
func (e *someAtomicError) Error() string { return "Hi!" }
func checkAtomicError() {
e := &someAtomicError{}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
e2IsE := errors.Is(e2, &someAtomicError{})
fmt.Println("atomic error trace ---\t\t", e2, "\t\t--- is traceable: ", e2IsE)
}
type someWrapperError struct {
Msg string
Err error
}
func (e someWrapperError) Error() string { return fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v", e.Msg, e.Err) }
func (e someWrapperError) Unwrap() error { return e.Err }
func checkWrapperError() {
e := someWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
e2IsE := errors.Is(e2, someWrapperError{"Hi!", nil})
fmt.Println("wrapper error trace ---\t\t", e2, "\t--- is traceable: ", e2IsE)
}
type somePointerWrapperError struct {
Msg string
Err error
}
func (e *somePointerWrapperError) Error() string { return fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v", e.Msg, e.Err) }
func (e *somePointerWrapperError) Unwrap() error { return e.Err }
func checkPointerWrapperError() {
e := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
e2IsE := errors.Is(e2, &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil})
fmt.Println("pointer wrapper error trace ---\t", e2, "\t--- is traceable: ", e2IsE)
}
func main() {
checkAtomicError()
checkWrapperError()
checkPointerWrapperError()
}
//atomic error trace --- whoa!: Hi! --- is traceable: true
//wrapper error trace --- whoa!: Hi!: <nil> --- is traceable: true
//pointer wrapper error trace --- whoa!: Hi!: <nil> --- is traceable: false
https://play.golang.org/p/-hSukZ-gii2
似乎参数中的任何差异,包括包装错误参数 Err
中的差异,都会导致无法使用 errors.Is()
找到类型。
您在尝试通过 errors.Is
在另一个错误中查找一个错误时得到 false
的原因是 - 虽然这两个错误可能具有相同的字段值 - 它们是两个不同的内存指针:
e := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil} // e2 != e
ew := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
errors.Is(ew, e) // true
errors.Is(ew, e2) // false - because `ew` wraps `e` not `e2`
那么如何检测这种“类型”的错误 和 得到它的值:使用 errors.As
代替:
e := &somePointerWrapperError{"Hi!", nil}
e2 := fmt.Errorf("whoa!: %w", e)
var ev *somePointerWrapperError
if errors.As(e2, &ev) {
fmt.Printf("%#v\n", ev) // &somePointerWrapperError{Msg:"Hi!", Err:error(nil)}
}
远程相关,但也许对某人有帮助:我花了一些时间才意识到 errors.As(...)
实际上需要指向目标的双指针,而 errors.Is(...)
不需要:
var _ error = (*CustomError)(nil) // ensure CustomError implements error
type CustomError struct {
msg string
}
func (e CustomError) Error() string {
return e.msg
}
func main() {
err := &CustomError{"Hello, world!"} // Methods return pointers to errors, allowing them to be nil
var eval *CustomError
as := errors.As(err, &eval) // yes, that's **CustomError
asFaulty := errors.As(err, eval) // no compile error, so it wrongly seems okay
is := errors.Is(err, eval) // that's just *CustomError
fmt.Printf("as: %t, asFaulty: %t, is: %t", as, asFaulty, is) // as: true, asFaulty: false, is: true
}