Java ArrayDeque push() 似乎添加到堆栈的 front/tail [潜在错误]
Java ArrayDeque push() seems to add to front/tail of stack [potential bug]
我正在研究 leetcode 问题 84,最大矩形。在测试时,我遇到了这个奇怪的情况,堆栈似乎添加到尾部。我使用打印语句和迭代器对象确认了这一点。
测试用例为:[4,2,0,3,2,5]
数组中的倒数第二个元素 2 似乎被推到了尾部,就在 0 的下方(它应该被推到顶部。在我的打印语句中,val:x gap:y 出现在元素被弹出时, x y z 出现在元素被推入并添加时: x 是迭代器打印的内容。整个堆栈在数组的每个增量处迭代。代码在这里。我确定只是发布了一个像这样的代码块是不礼貌的,所以请随时提出一些批评。
class Solution {
public int largestRectangleArea(int[] heights) {
//use a stack
//if element is bigger than top of stack, than add element to stack
//if element is same as top, add element to stack
//if element is less than top, pop all elements and calculate areas, also keep track of area of new top
Deque<Helper> myStack = new ArrayDeque<Helper>();
if (heights.length == 0 || heights == null) return 0;
if (heights.length == 1) return heights[0];
int poppedLength = 0;
int area;
int maxArea = 0;
Helper previous = new Helper(heights[0]);
myStack.push(previous);
for (int i = 1; i < heights.length; i++) { //iterate through input array
Iterator<Helper> myIt = myStack.iterator();
while (myIt.hasNext()) { //iterate through stack, for testing purposes
System.out.print(myIt.next().toString());
System.out.println();
}
if (!myStack.isEmpty()) {
if (heights[i] >= myStack.peek().getValue()) {//if curr element is greater than last, push current element
myStack.push(new Helper(heights[i]));
System.out.print("added1: "); //testing print statements
System.out.println(heights[i]);
} else {
while (heights[i] < myStack.peek().getValue()) { //if current element is less than head of stack, pop elements from stack until current is >= head of stack
Helper popped = myStack.pop();
poppedLength++;
area = (poppedLength + popped.getGapLength()) * popped.getValue();
System.out.print(poppedLength + popped.getGapLength()); //print statements for testing
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(popped.getValue());
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(area);
System.out.println();
if (area > maxArea) maxArea = area; //update max
if (myStack.isEmpty()) break;
}
if (!myStack.isEmpty()) {
myStack.peek().setGapLength(poppedLength + myStack.peek().getGapLength());
}
myStack.add(new Helper(heights[i], poppedLength)); //push current, THIS IS WHERE THE ERROR IS OCCURING
System.out.print("added2: ");
System.out.println(heights[i]);
poppedLength = 0;
}
} else {//if stack is empty for some reason, this actually should never execute
myStack.push(new Helper(heights[i]));
}
}
while (!myStack.isEmpty()) {//remove rest of elements in the stack
Helper popped = myStack.pop();
poppedLength++;
area = (poppedLength + popped.getGapLength()) * popped.getValue();
if (area > maxArea) maxArea = area;
System.out.print(poppedLength + popped.getGapLength());
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(popped.getValue());
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(area);
System.out.println();
}
return maxArea;
}
class Helper {//the elements of the stack
private int value;
private int gapLength;
public Helper(int val) {
value = val;
gapLength = 0;
}
public Helper(int val, int gap) {
value = val;
gapLength = gap;
}
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
public int getGapLength() {
return gapLength;
}
public void setGapLength(int length) {
gapLength = length;
}
public String toString() {
String retStr = "Val: " + Integer.toString(value) + " Gap:" + Integer.toString(gapLength) + " ";
return retStr;
}
}
}
您解决问题的方式很好,将其分解为多个函数。但是,调试起来对我们来说很困难。
这会通过:
class Solution {
public static int largestRectangleArea(int[] height) {
if (height == null || height.length == 0) {
return 0;
}
int[] leftReduce = new int[height.length];
int[] rightReduce = new int[height.length];
rightReduce[height.length - 1] = height.length;
leftReduce[0] = -1;
for (int i = 1; i < height.length; i++) {
int p = i - 1;
while (p >= 0 && height[p] >= height[i]) {
p = leftReduce[p];
}
leftReduce[i] = p;
}
for (int i = height.length - 2; i >= 0; i--) {
int p = i + 1;
while (p < height.length && height[p] >= height[i]) {
p = rightReduce[p];
}
rightReduce[i] = p;
}
int maxArea = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < height.length; i++) {
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, height[i] * (rightReduce[i] - leftReduce[i] - 1));
}
return maxArea;
}
}
就像问题下的评论一样,我对这行也有点困惑:
Deque<Helper> myStack = new ArrayDeque<Helper>();
参考资料
- 有关其他详细信息,您可以在其中查看 Discussion Board. There are plenty of accepted solutions with a variety of languages and explanations, efficient algorithms, as well as asymptotic time/space complexity analysis1, 2。
因为你正在准备 interviews:
我们想写bug-free and clean codes based on standards and conventions (e.g., c1, 2, c++1, 2, java1, 2, c#1, 2, python1, javascript1, go1, rust1).
面试期间实施解决方案的时间非常有限。确保不会 运行 因代码设计复杂化而超时。
祝你面试顺利! ^_^
我无法确切地弄清楚我的错误是什么,但能够通过调用 push() 方法而不是同时调用 push() 和 add() 方法来解决问题。我怀疑这些方法依赖于不能互换使用。
我正在研究 leetcode 问题 84,最大矩形。在测试时,我遇到了这个奇怪的情况,堆栈似乎添加到尾部。我使用打印语句和迭代器对象确认了这一点。
测试用例为:[4,2,0,3,2,5]
数组中的倒数第二个元素 2 似乎被推到了尾部,就在 0 的下方(它应该被推到顶部。在我的打印语句中,val:x gap:y 出现在元素被弹出时, x y z 出现在元素被推入并添加时: x 是迭代器打印的内容。整个堆栈在数组的每个增量处迭代。代码在这里。我确定只是发布了一个像这样的代码块是不礼貌的,所以请随时提出一些批评。
class Solution {
public int largestRectangleArea(int[] heights) {
//use a stack
//if element is bigger than top of stack, than add element to stack
//if element is same as top, add element to stack
//if element is less than top, pop all elements and calculate areas, also keep track of area of new top
Deque<Helper> myStack = new ArrayDeque<Helper>();
if (heights.length == 0 || heights == null) return 0;
if (heights.length == 1) return heights[0];
int poppedLength = 0;
int area;
int maxArea = 0;
Helper previous = new Helper(heights[0]);
myStack.push(previous);
for (int i = 1; i < heights.length; i++) { //iterate through input array
Iterator<Helper> myIt = myStack.iterator();
while (myIt.hasNext()) { //iterate through stack, for testing purposes
System.out.print(myIt.next().toString());
System.out.println();
}
if (!myStack.isEmpty()) {
if (heights[i] >= myStack.peek().getValue()) {//if curr element is greater than last, push current element
myStack.push(new Helper(heights[i]));
System.out.print("added1: "); //testing print statements
System.out.println(heights[i]);
} else {
while (heights[i] < myStack.peek().getValue()) { //if current element is less than head of stack, pop elements from stack until current is >= head of stack
Helper popped = myStack.pop();
poppedLength++;
area = (poppedLength + popped.getGapLength()) * popped.getValue();
System.out.print(poppedLength + popped.getGapLength()); //print statements for testing
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(popped.getValue());
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(area);
System.out.println();
if (area > maxArea) maxArea = area; //update max
if (myStack.isEmpty()) break;
}
if (!myStack.isEmpty()) {
myStack.peek().setGapLength(poppedLength + myStack.peek().getGapLength());
}
myStack.add(new Helper(heights[i], poppedLength)); //push current, THIS IS WHERE THE ERROR IS OCCURING
System.out.print("added2: ");
System.out.println(heights[i]);
poppedLength = 0;
}
} else {//if stack is empty for some reason, this actually should never execute
myStack.push(new Helper(heights[i]));
}
}
while (!myStack.isEmpty()) {//remove rest of elements in the stack
Helper popped = myStack.pop();
poppedLength++;
area = (poppedLength + popped.getGapLength()) * popped.getValue();
if (area > maxArea) maxArea = area;
System.out.print(poppedLength + popped.getGapLength());
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(popped.getValue());
System.out.print(" ");
System.out.print(area);
System.out.println();
}
return maxArea;
}
class Helper {//the elements of the stack
private int value;
private int gapLength;
public Helper(int val) {
value = val;
gapLength = 0;
}
public Helper(int val, int gap) {
value = val;
gapLength = gap;
}
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
public int getGapLength() {
return gapLength;
}
public void setGapLength(int length) {
gapLength = length;
}
public String toString() {
String retStr = "Val: " + Integer.toString(value) + " Gap:" + Integer.toString(gapLength) + " ";
return retStr;
}
}
}
您解决问题的方式很好,将其分解为多个函数。但是,调试起来对我们来说很困难。
这会通过:
class Solution {
public static int largestRectangleArea(int[] height) {
if (height == null || height.length == 0) {
return 0;
}
int[] leftReduce = new int[height.length];
int[] rightReduce = new int[height.length];
rightReduce[height.length - 1] = height.length;
leftReduce[0] = -1;
for (int i = 1; i < height.length; i++) {
int p = i - 1;
while (p >= 0 && height[p] >= height[i]) {
p = leftReduce[p];
}
leftReduce[i] = p;
}
for (int i = height.length - 2; i >= 0; i--) {
int p = i + 1;
while (p < height.length && height[p] >= height[i]) {
p = rightReduce[p];
}
rightReduce[i] = p;
}
int maxArea = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < height.length; i++) {
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, height[i] * (rightReduce[i] - leftReduce[i] - 1));
}
return maxArea;
}
}
就像问题下的评论一样,我对这行也有点困惑:
Deque<Helper> myStack = new ArrayDeque<Helper>();
参考资料
- 有关其他详细信息,您可以在其中查看 Discussion Board. There are plenty of accepted solutions with a variety of languages and explanations, efficient algorithms, as well as asymptotic time/space complexity analysis1, 2。
因为你正在准备 interviews:
我们想写bug-free and clean codes based on standards and conventions (e.g., c1, 2, c++1, 2, java1, 2, c#1, 2, python1, javascript1, go1, rust1).
面试期间实施解决方案的时间非常有限。确保不会 运行 因代码设计复杂化而超时。
祝你面试顺利! ^_^
我无法确切地弄清楚我的错误是什么,但能够通过调用 push() 方法而不是同时调用 push() 和 add() 方法来解决问题。我怀疑这些方法依赖于不能互换使用。