项目分叉后，原始作者是否应该包含在 pom.xml 开发人员标签中？
Should original authors be included in pom.xml developers tag after project is forked?
我正在考虑分叉一个存在已久但看似废弃的 OSS 项目。在我更新的 pom.xml 中，我是否应该包括原创作品的开发人员以给予他们荣誉，因为他们负责 99% 的代码，或者只是新的维护人员，正如 Maven POM Reference 所暗示的：
All projects consist of files that were created, at some time, by a
person. Like the other systems that surround a project, so to do the
people involved with a project have a stake in the project. Developers
are presumably members of the project's core development. Note that,
although an organization may have many developers (programmers) as
members, it is not good form to list them all as developers, but only
those who are immediately responsible for the code. A good rule of
thumb is, if the person should not be contacted about the project,
they do not need to be listed here.
它只是 pom.xml 文件。做喜欢它写在经验法则中。
对于分支或分叉，历史和依赖项或代码库应在其他地方阐明，例如git、GitHub.com、GitLab.com、项目页面、文档...
我正在考虑分叉一个存在已久但看似废弃的 OSS 项目。在我更新的 pom.xml 中，我是否应该包括原创作品的开发人员以给予他们荣誉，因为他们负责 99% 的代码，或者只是新的维护人员，正如 Maven POM Reference 所暗示的：
All projects consist of files that were created, at some time, by a person. Like the other systems that surround a project, so to do the people involved with a project have a stake in the project. Developers are presumably members of the project's core development. Note that, although an organization may have many developers (programmers) as members, it is not good form to list them all as developers, but only those who are immediately responsible for the code. A good rule of thumb is, if the person should not be contacted about the project, they do not need to be listed here.
它只是 pom.xml 文件。做喜欢它写在经验法则中。
对于分支或分叉，历史和依赖项或代码库应在其他地方阐明，例如git、GitHub.com、GitLab.com、项目页面、文档...