如何使用 Symbol 或 Type 对象将泛型类型传递给泛型函数?
How to pass into generic type using a Symbol or Type object into a generic typed function?
在 Scala 中,是否可以将派生自 Symbol 或 Type 对象的类型传递给泛型函数?例如:
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
def a[T: TypeTag](): Unit = {
val fields: Seq[Symbol] = typeOf[T].members.filter(_.isMethod == false).toSeq
fields.foreach(x => {
b[x.getMyType]() // How to pass field's "Type" into generic typed function?
})
}
def b[T](): Unit = ???
a[Person]()
从上面的示例中,我有兴趣调用 a[Person]()
并在 a() 中使用反射从 Person 获取字段以使用每个字段的类型调用 b[?]()
。
is it possible to pass a type derived from a Symbol or Type object into a generic typed function?
方法 b
的类型参数 T
必须在编译时知道,但 x.typeSignature
只有在运行时才知道。
您可以尝试使用 compile-time reflection 而不是运行时。然后 x.typeSignature
在宏运行时已知,这是主代码的编译时间。
// macros subproject
import scala.language.experimental.macros
import scala.reflect.macros.blackbox
def a[T](): Unit = macro aImpl[T]
def aImpl[T: c.WeakTypeTag](c: blackbox.Context)(): c.Tree = {
import c.universe._
val fields: Seq[Symbol] = weakTypeOf[T].members.filter(_.isMethod == false).toSeq
val bCalls = fields.map(x =>
q"b[${x.typeSignature}]()"
)
q"..$bCalls"
}
// main subproject
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
def b[T](): Unit = ???
a[Person]()
// scalac: {
// b[App.Address]();
// b[Int]();
// b[String]()
//}
类似的事情可以用Shapeless来完成。
import shapeless.ops.hlist.{FillWith, Mapper}
import shapeless.{Generic, HList, Poly0, Poly1}
def b[T](): Unit = println("b")
object bPoly extends Poly1 {
implicit def cse[X]: Case.Aux[X, Unit] = at(_ => b[X]())
}
object nullPoly extends Poly0 {
implicit def cse[X]: Case0[X] = at(null.asInstanceOf[X])
}
def a[T] = new PartiallyAppliedA[T]
class PartiallyAppliedA[T] {
def apply[L <: HList]()(implicit
generic: Generic.Aux[T, L],
mapper: Mapper[bPoly.type, L],
fillWith: FillWith[nullPoly.type, L]
): Unit = mapper(fillWith())
}
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
a[Person]()
//b
//b
//b
或者,如果您真的想使用运行时反射,则必须将 b[...]()
的编译推迟到运行时。您可以使用 toolbox.
import scala.reflect.runtime.currentMirror
import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._
import scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox
val toolbox = currentMirror.mkToolBox()
def a[T: TypeTag](): Unit = {
val fields: Seq[Symbol] = typeOf[T].members.filter(_.isMethod == false).toSeq
val bCalls = fields.map(x =>
q"b[${x.typeSignature}]()"
)
toolbox.eval(q"""
import Obj._
..$bCalls
""")
}
object Obj {
def b[T](): Unit = println("b")
}
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
a[Person]()
//b
//b
//b
在 Scala 中,是否可以将派生自 Symbol 或 Type 对象的类型传递给泛型函数?例如:
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
def a[T: TypeTag](): Unit = {
val fields: Seq[Symbol] = typeOf[T].members.filter(_.isMethod == false).toSeq
fields.foreach(x => {
b[x.getMyType]() // How to pass field's "Type" into generic typed function?
})
}
def b[T](): Unit = ???
a[Person]()
从上面的示例中,我有兴趣调用 a[Person]()
并在 a() 中使用反射从 Person 获取字段以使用每个字段的类型调用 b[?]()
。
is it possible to pass a type derived from a Symbol or Type object into a generic typed function?
方法 b
的类型参数 T
必须在编译时知道,但 x.typeSignature
只有在运行时才知道。
您可以尝试使用 compile-time reflection 而不是运行时。然后 x.typeSignature
在宏运行时已知,这是主代码的编译时间。
// macros subproject
import scala.language.experimental.macros
import scala.reflect.macros.blackbox
def a[T](): Unit = macro aImpl[T]
def aImpl[T: c.WeakTypeTag](c: blackbox.Context)(): c.Tree = {
import c.universe._
val fields: Seq[Symbol] = weakTypeOf[T].members.filter(_.isMethod == false).toSeq
val bCalls = fields.map(x =>
q"b[${x.typeSignature}]()"
)
q"..$bCalls"
}
// main subproject
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
def b[T](): Unit = ???
a[Person]()
// scalac: {
// b[App.Address]();
// b[Int]();
// b[String]()
//}
类似的事情可以用Shapeless来完成。
import shapeless.ops.hlist.{FillWith, Mapper}
import shapeless.{Generic, HList, Poly0, Poly1}
def b[T](): Unit = println("b")
object bPoly extends Poly1 {
implicit def cse[X]: Case.Aux[X, Unit] = at(_ => b[X]())
}
object nullPoly extends Poly0 {
implicit def cse[X]: Case0[X] = at(null.asInstanceOf[X])
}
def a[T] = new PartiallyAppliedA[T]
class PartiallyAppliedA[T] {
def apply[L <: HList]()(implicit
generic: Generic.Aux[T, L],
mapper: Mapper[bPoly.type, L],
fillWith: FillWith[nullPoly.type, L]
): Unit = mapper(fillWith())
}
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
a[Person]()
//b
//b
//b
或者,如果您真的想使用运行时反射,则必须将 b[...]()
的编译推迟到运行时。您可以使用 toolbox.
import scala.reflect.runtime.currentMirror
import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._
import scala.tools.reflect.ToolBox
val toolbox = currentMirror.mkToolBox()
def a[T: TypeTag](): Unit = {
val fields: Seq[Symbol] = typeOf[T].members.filter(_.isMethod == false).toSeq
val bCalls = fields.map(x =>
q"b[${x.typeSignature}]()"
)
toolbox.eval(q"""
import Obj._
..$bCalls
""")
}
object Obj {
def b[T](): Unit = println("b")
}
case class Address(street: String, city: String, state: String, zipCode: String)
case class Person(name: String, age: Int, address: Address)
a[Person]()
//b
//b
//b